Report from the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors subcommittee on graduate medical education funding: Effects of decreased Medicare support

被引:9
作者
Martin, DR
Kazzi, AA
Wolford, R
Holliman, CJ
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Hlth Sci Lib 016,Div Emergency Med, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Div Emergency Med, Irvine, CA USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, Coll Human Med, Program Emergency Med, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[4] Michigan State Univ, Saginaw Cooperat Hosp, Saginaw, MI USA
[5] Penn State Univ, Dept Emergency Med, Hershey, PA USA
关键词
graduate medical education (GME); Balanced Budget Act; Medicare reimbursement;
D O I
10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb00212.x
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: Recent changes by the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) have resulted in decreased Medicare support for emergency medicine (EM) residencies. Objective: To determine the effects of reduced graduate medical education (GME) funding support on residency size, resident rotations, and support for a fourth postgraduate year (PGY) of training and for residents with previous training. Methods: A 36-question survey was developed by the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors (CORD) committee on GME funding and sent to all 122 EM program directors (PDs). Responses were collected by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) office and blinded with respect to the institution. Results: Of 122 programs, 109 (89%) responded, of which 78 were PGY 1-3 programs, 19 were PGY 2-4, and 12 were PGY 1-4. The PDs were asked specifically whether there were changes in program size due to changes in Medicare reimbursement. Although few programs (12%) decreased their size or planned to decrease their size, 39% had discussions regarding decreasing their size. Thirty percent of the PDs responded that other programs at their institution had already decreased their size; 26% of the PDs had problems with financing outside rotations; and 24% had a decrease in off-service residents in their emergency departments (EDs). Only seven (6%) of programs paid residents from practice plan dollars, while most (82%) were fully supported by federal GME funding. Nearly all four-year programs (97%) received full resident salary support from their institutions and 77% of programs accept residents with previous training. Conclusions: Nearly all EM programs are fully supported by their institutions, including the fourth postgraduate year. Most programs take residents with previous training. Although few programs have reduced their size, many are discussing this. Many programs have had difficulty with funding off-service rotations and many have had decreased numbers of off-service residents in their EDs. Recent GME funding changes have had adverse effects on EM residency programs.
引用
收藏
页码:809 / 814
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] *ASS AM MED COLL, 2000, WASH HIGHL PROP LEG
  • [2] *ASS AM MED COLL, 2000, WASH HIGHL SEN DEM I
  • [3] *ASS AM MED COLL, 2000, WASH HIGHL HCFA PROP
  • [4] *ASS AM MED COLL, 2000, WASH HIGHL HOSP CEOS
  • [5] *ASS AM MED COLL, 2000, WASH HIGHL HCFA ISS
  • [6] *COUNC GRAD MED ED, 2000, RES PAP EFF BAL BUDG
  • [7] The Balanced Budget Act of 1997: Its impact on US teaching hospitals
    Dickler, R
    Shaw, G
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 132 (10) : 820 - 824
  • [8] FISHMAN LE, 1996, MEDICARE PAYMENTS ED
  • [9] GENTILE TC, 1998, MEDICARE REIMBURSEME
  • [10] GESENSWAY D, 3 CONSECUTIVE LOSS M