Feasibility of percutaneous implantation of transapical endocardial left ventricular pacing electrode for cardiac resynchronization therapy

被引:21
作者
Kassai, Imre [1 ]
Friedrich, Orsolya [2 ]
Ratnatunga, Chandi [2 ]
Betts, Timothy R. [2 ]
Mihalcz, Attila [1 ]
Szili-Torok, Tamas [3 ]
机构
[1] Gottsegen Hungarian Inst Cardiol, Dept Cardiac Surg, Budapest, Hungary
[2] John Radcliffe Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Oxford OX3 9DU, England
[3] Erasmus MC, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Thoraxctr, Rotterdam, Netherlands
来源
EUROPACE | 2011年 / 13卷 / 11期
关键词
Heart failure; Biventricular pacing; Trans-apical; Percutaneous; HEART-FAILURE; STIMULATION; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1093/europace/eur190
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Failure of coronary sinus lead implantation for resynchronization therapy requires alternative approaches. For such events we have developed a transapical implantation technique as a feasible alternative. We report the outcome of this technique and its evolution from a minithoracotomy to a percutaneous approach. Twenty patients underwent alternative resynchronization therapy with transapical endocardial left ventricular (LV) pacing lead implantation in a multicentre, international study between October 2007 and March 2010. Eighteen patients underwent minithoracotomy and transapical puncture under direct observation. Two recent patients had transthoracic echocardiography- guided percutaneous apical puncture to enter the LV cavity. A 19 or 21 ga needle and two-stage Seldinger dilatation with 4 and 7 Fr sheaths were then used to introduce the lead. In the two patients with closed-chest insertion of the electrode there was no puncture related bleeding or lung damage. Lead dislocation occurred in two minithoracotomy patients. Repositioning was performed without reopening the pleural cavity. One patient developed right-sided implanted cardiac defibrillator lead endocarditis requiring complete system removal. Twelve patients have >1 year follow-up; all have sustained and significant improvement in LV dimensions (diastolic Delta 4.2 +/- 2.9, systolic Delta 7.2 +/- 5.8 mm), ejection fraction (Delta 9.5 +/- 9.6%), and functional status (Delta 1.1 +/- 0.3). Transapical placement of LV endocardial pacing lead is an effective alternative strategy for cardiac resynchronization. A closed-chest, percutaneous approach is feasible and should offer even less invasive intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:1653 / 1657
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Left ventricular endocardial or triventricular pacing to optimize cardiac resynchronization therapy in a chronic canine model of ischemic heart failure
    Bordachar, Pierre
    Grenz, Nathan
    Jais, Pierre
    Ritter, Philippe
    Leclercq, Christophe
    Morgan, John M.
    Gras, Daniel
    Yang, Ping
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-HEART AND CIRCULATORY PHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 303 (02): : H207 - H215
  • [42] Feasibility of physiological pacing rate in cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Spaggiari, Caio V.
    de Siqueira, Sergio F.
    de Oliveira, Camila Parente
    Gomes, Cinthya I. Guiarao I.
    Alves, Maria Janieire de N. N.
    Martinelli Filho, Martino
    ESC HEART FAILURE, 2023, 10 (04): : 2751 - 2753
  • [43] Alternative left ventricular pacing approaches for optimal cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Galand, Vincent
    Singh, Jagmeet P.
    Leclercq, Christophe
    HEART RHYTHM, 2019, 16 (08) : 1281 - 1289
  • [44] Permanent His-bundle pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: Initial feasibility study in lieu of left ventricular lead
    Ajijola, Olujimi A.
    Upadhyay, Gaurav A.
    Macias, Carlos
    Shivkumar, Kalyanam
    Tung, Roderick
    HEART RHYTHM, 2017, 14 (09) : 1353 - 1361
  • [45] Leadless endocardial left ventricular resynchronization: is it ready for prime time?
    Madhavan, Malini
    Friedman, Paul A.
    EUROPACE, 2014, 16 (05): : 623 - 625
  • [46] Left ventricular endocardial pacing for the critically ill
    Rinaldi, C. A.
    Auricchio, A.
    Prinzen, F. W.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 44 (06) : 915 - 917
  • [47] Pacemaker Optimization in Nonresponders to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Left Ventricular Pacing as an Available Option
    Gage, Ryan M.
    Burns, Kevin V.
    Vatterott, Daniel B.
    Kubo, Spencer H.
    Bank, Alan J.
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 35 (06): : 685 - 694
  • [48] Left Ventricular Endocardial Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Is Here, But Where Should We Place the Lead?
    Heist, E. Kevin
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 4 (07) : 869 - 871
  • [49] Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves left ventricular remodeling and function compared with right ventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular block
    Lu, Dasheng
    Zhang, Hao
    Zhang, Hongxiang
    HEART FAILURE REVIEWS, 2018, 23 (06) : 919 - 926
  • [50] Invasive optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: Role of sequential biventricular and left ventricular pacing
    Kurzidim, K
    Reinke, H
    Sperzel, J
    Schneider, HJ
    Danilovic, D
    Siemon, G
    Neumann, T
    Hamm, CW
    Pitschner, HF
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 28 (08): : 754 - 761