Feasibility of percutaneous implantation of transapical endocardial left ventricular pacing electrode for cardiac resynchronization therapy

被引:21
作者
Kassai, Imre [1 ]
Friedrich, Orsolya [2 ]
Ratnatunga, Chandi [2 ]
Betts, Timothy R. [2 ]
Mihalcz, Attila [1 ]
Szili-Torok, Tamas [3 ]
机构
[1] Gottsegen Hungarian Inst Cardiol, Dept Cardiac Surg, Budapest, Hungary
[2] John Radcliffe Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Oxford OX3 9DU, England
[3] Erasmus MC, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Thoraxctr, Rotterdam, Netherlands
来源
EUROPACE | 2011年 / 13卷 / 11期
关键词
Heart failure; Biventricular pacing; Trans-apical; Percutaneous; HEART-FAILURE; STIMULATION; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1093/europace/eur190
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Failure of coronary sinus lead implantation for resynchronization therapy requires alternative approaches. For such events we have developed a transapical implantation technique as a feasible alternative. We report the outcome of this technique and its evolution from a minithoracotomy to a percutaneous approach. Twenty patients underwent alternative resynchronization therapy with transapical endocardial left ventricular (LV) pacing lead implantation in a multicentre, international study between October 2007 and March 2010. Eighteen patients underwent minithoracotomy and transapical puncture under direct observation. Two recent patients had transthoracic echocardiography- guided percutaneous apical puncture to enter the LV cavity. A 19 or 21 ga needle and two-stage Seldinger dilatation with 4 and 7 Fr sheaths were then used to introduce the lead. In the two patients with closed-chest insertion of the electrode there was no puncture related bleeding or lung damage. Lead dislocation occurred in two minithoracotomy patients. Repositioning was performed without reopening the pleural cavity. One patient developed right-sided implanted cardiac defibrillator lead endocarditis requiring complete system removal. Twelve patients have >1 year follow-up; all have sustained and significant improvement in LV dimensions (diastolic Delta 4.2 +/- 2.9, systolic Delta 7.2 +/- 5.8 mm), ejection fraction (Delta 9.5 +/- 9.6%), and functional status (Delta 1.1 +/- 0.3). Transapical placement of LV endocardial pacing lead is an effective alternative strategy for cardiac resynchronization. A closed-chest, percutaneous approach is feasible and should offer even less invasive intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:1653 / 1657
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multipoint left ventricular pacing as an addition to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a bridge to the holy grail?
    Antoniou, Christos-Konstantinos
    Xydis, Panagiotis
    Konstantinou, Konstantinos
    Magkas, Nikolaos
    Manolakou, Panagiota
    Dilaveris, Polychronis
    Chrysohoou, Christina
    Gatzoulis, Konstantinos A.
    Tsioufis, Costas
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE, 2021, 11 (04): : 429 - 440
  • [22] Enhancing the Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Is It Time to Individualize the Left Ventricular Pacing Site?
    Singh, Jagmeet P.
    Abraham, William T.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (06) : 576 - 578
  • [23] The Jurdham procedure: Endocardial left ventricular lead insertion via a femoral transseptal sheath for cardiac resynchronization therapy pectoral device implantation
    Elencwajg, Benjamin
    Lopez Cabanillas, Nestor
    Luis Cardinali, Eduardo
    Luis Barisani, Jose
    Trainini, Jorge
    Fischer, Avi
    Worley, Seth
    HEART RHYTHM, 2012, 9 (11) : 1798 - 1804
  • [24] Feasibility of Left Ventricle Lead Implantation in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Guided by Gated SPECT and Ventricular Remodeling
    do Nascimento, Erivelton Alessandro
    Fernandes, Fernando de Amorim
    Mira, Pedro Augusto Carvalho
    He, Zhuo
    Zhou, Weihua
    Mesquita, Claudio Tinoco
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2023, 120 (03)
  • [25] Left Bundle Branch Pacing vs Left Ventricular Septal Pacing vs Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Diaz, Juan C.
    Tedrow, Usha B.
    Duque, Mauricio
    Aristizabal, Julian
    Braunstein, Eric D.
    Marin, Jorge
    Nino, Cesar
    Bastidas, Oriana
    Cabanillas, Nestor Lopez
    Koplan, Bruce A.
    Hoyos, Carolina
    Matos, Carlos D.
    Hincapie, Daniela
    Velasco, Alejandro
    Steiger, Nathaniel A.
    Kapur, Sunil
    Tadros, Thomas M.
    Zei, Paul C.
    Sauer, William H.
    Romero, Jorge E.
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 10 (02) : 295 - 305
  • [26] Thoracoscopic Implantation of Epicardial Left Ventricular Lead for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Kim, Hye Ree
    Lim, Kyunghee
    Park, Seung-Jung
    Park, Jong-Sung
    Kim, Ju Youn
    Chung, Suryeun
    Jung, Dong-Seop
    Park, Kyoung-Min
    On, Young Keun
    Kim, June Soo
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DEVELOPMENT AND DISEASE, 2022, 9 (05)
  • [27] Evaluation of synchronized left ventricular pacing rate over biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Miyazaki, Yuichiro
    Ishibashi, Kohei
    Ueda, Nobuhiko
    Oka, Satoshi
    Wakamiya, Akinori
    Shimamoto, Keiko
    Nakajima, Kenzaburo
    Kamakura, Tsukasa
    Wada, Mitsuru
    Inoue, Yuko
    Miyamoto, Koji
    Nagase, Satoshi
    Aiba, Takeshi
    Kusano, Kengo
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 84 (03) : 165 - 169
  • [28] Left univentricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Burri, Haran
    Prinzen, Frits W.
    Gasparini, Maurizio
    Leclercq, Christophe
    EUROPACE, 2017, 19 (06): : 912 - 919
  • [29] Pacing polarity and left ventricular mechanical activation sequence in cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Yang, Hyan Suk
    Caracciolo, Giuseppe
    Sengupta, Partho P.
    Goel, Ramil
    Chandrasekaran, Krishnaswamy
    Srivathsan, Komandoor
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 35 (01) : 101 - 107
  • [30] Pacing polarity and left ventricular mechanical activation sequence in cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Hyan Suk Yang
    Giuseppe Caracciolo
    Partho P. Sengupta
    Ramil Goel
    Krishnaswamy Chandrasekaran
    Komandoor Srivathsan
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2012, 35 : 101 - 107