The efficacy and safety of GP40081 (insulin aspart biphasic 30) compared with NovoMix® 30 in Type 2 diabetes patients

被引:2
作者
Drai, Roman, V [1 ]
Mayorov, Alexander Y. [2 ]
Karonova, Tatiana L. [3 ]
Parfenova, Tatiana M. [4 ]
Makarenko, Igor E. [1 ]
Magruk, Maxim A. [1 ]
Alpenidze, Diana N. [5 ]
Kovalik, Vladislav V. [1 ]
Zinnatulina, Bella R. [1 ]
Grigorjeva, Irina, V [1 ]
Andreeva, Alena T. [3 ]
机构
[1] GEROPHARM, R&D Ctr, Degtyarny Lane 11B St, St Petersburg 191144, Russia
[2] Endocrinol Res Ctr, Dm Ulyanova St 11, Moscow 117036, Russia
[3] Almazov Natl Med Res Ctr, Inst Endocrinol, Akkuratova St 2, St Petersburg 197341, Russia
[4] Krasnoyarsk State Med Univ, Partizana Zheleznyaka St 1, Krasnoyarsk 660022, Russia
[5] City Polyclin 117,Simonova St 5-1, St Petersburg 194358, Russia
关键词
biosimilar; endocrinology/metabolism; GP-Asp30; immunogenicity; insulin aspart; phase III study; COMPLICATIONS; MELLITUS;
D O I
10.2217/cer-2021-0232
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of insulin Aspart-Mix biosimilar candidate GP40081 (GP-Asp30) compared with NovoMix (R) 30 (NN-Asp30). Materials & methods: In a randomized open-label, active-controlled, 26-week non-inferiority clinical trial 264 patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus were randomized 1:1 to receive once-daily GP-Asp30 or NN-Asp30. The primary safety end point was the immune response rate. Efficacy outcomes were a mean change in HbA1c (primary), frequency of achieving a glycemic g fasting plasma glucose levels, 7-point glucose profiles, and insulin doses. Results: The immune response developed in 10/126 (8%) participants in the GP-Asp30 group and in 10/125 (8%) participants in the NN-Asp30 group (p = 1.000). The mean difference in HbA1c change between groups was 0.12 (95%CI[-0.14, 0.38]). Other secondary efficacy and safety outcomes weren't statistically different between the two groups. Conclusion: GP-Asp30 demonstrated similar safety and efficacy compared with NN-Asp30 and may be considered a biosimilar insulin.
引用
收藏
页码:1337 / 1347
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Insulin degludec/insulin aspart versus biphasic insulin aspart 30 in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on basal or pre-/self-mixed insulin: A 26-week, randomised, treat-to-target trial
    Kaneko, Shizuka
    Chow, Francis
    Choi, Dong Seop
    Taneda, Shinji
    Hirao, Koichi
    Park, Yongsoo
    Andersen, Thomas Hasseriis
    Gall, Mari-Anne
    Christiansen, Jens Sandahl
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2015, 107 (01) : 139 - 147
  • [42] Cost-Effectiveness of Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart Versus Biphasic Insulin Aspart in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes from a Danish Health-Care Perspective
    Evans, Marc
    Gundgaard, Jens
    Hansen, Brian Bekker
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2016, 7 (04) : 809 - 823
  • [43] Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of Insulin Aspart Biosimilar SAR341402 Compared with Originator Insulin Aspart in Adults with Diabetes (GEMELLI 1): A Subgroup Analysis by Prior Type of Mealtime Insulin
    Shah, Viral N.
    Franek, Edward
    Wernicke-Panten, Karin
    Pierre, Suzanne
    Mukherjee, Bhaswati
    Sadeharju, Karita
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2021, 12 (02) : 557 - 568
  • [44] Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of Insulin Aspart Biosimilar SAR341402 Compared with Originator Insulin Aspart in Adults with Diabetes (GEMELLI 1): A Subgroup Analysis by Prior Type of Mealtime Insulin
    Viral N. Shah
    Edward Franek
    Karin Wernicke-Panten
    Suzanne Pierre
    Bhaswati Mukherjee
    Karita Sadeharju
    Diabetes Therapy, 2021, 12 : 557 - 568
  • [45] Safety and Efficacy of Switching SAR341402 Insulin Aspart and Originator Insulin Aspart vs Continuous Use of Originator Insulin Aspart in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: The GEMELLI X Trial
    Shah, Viral N.
    Al-Karadsheh, Amer
    Barnes, Cathy
    Mandry, Jose
    Nakhle, Samer
    Wernicke-Panten, Karin
    Kramer, Daniel
    Schmider, Wolfgang
    Pierre, Suzanne
    Teichert, Lenore
    Rotthaeuser, Baerbel
    Mukherjee, Bhaswati
    Bailey, Timothy S.
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024,
  • [46] Premixed insulin aspart 30 vs. premixed human insulin 30/70 twice daily: a randomized trial in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients
    Boehm, BO
    Home, PD
    Behrendt, C
    Kampt, NM
    Lindholm, A
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2002, 19 (05) : 393 - 399
  • [47] The study of once- and twice-daily biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) with sitagliptin, and twice-daily BIAsp 30 without sitagliptin, in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on sitagliptin and metformin-The Sit2Mix trial
    Linjawi, Sultan
    Sothiratnam, Radhakrishna
    Sari, Ramazan
    Andersen, Henning
    Hiort, Line Conradsen
    Rao, Paturi
    PRIMARY CARE DIABETES, 2015, 9 (05) : 370 - 376
  • [48] Predictors of achieving HbA1c <7% and no hypoglycaemia 6 months after initiation of biphasic insulin aspart 30 in patients with type 2 diabetes in the IMPROVE study
    Valensi, Paul
    Shaban, Joseph
    Benroubi, Marian
    Kawamori, Ryuzo
    Borzi, Vito
    Shah, Siddharth
    Yang Wenying
    Prusty, Vinay
    Hansen, Jes B.
    Gumprecht, Janusz
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2013, 29 (06) : 601 - 609
  • [49] Similar glucose control with basal bolus regimen of insulin detemir plus insulin aspart and thrice-daily biphasic insulin aspart 30 in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes: Results of a 50-week randomized clinical trial of stepwise insulin intensification
    Malek, R.
    Ajili, F.
    Assaad-Khalil, S. H.
    Shinde, A.
    Chen, J. W.
    Van den Berg, E.
    DIABETES & METABOLISM, 2015, 41 (03) : 223 - 230
  • [50] A comparison of insulin aspart and regular insulin in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes
    Meneilly, G. S.
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2007, 9 (05) : 754 - 755