The efficacy and safety of GP40081 (insulin aspart biphasic 30) compared with NovoMix® 30 in Type 2 diabetes patients

被引:2
作者
Drai, Roman, V [1 ]
Mayorov, Alexander Y. [2 ]
Karonova, Tatiana L. [3 ]
Parfenova, Tatiana M. [4 ]
Makarenko, Igor E. [1 ]
Magruk, Maxim A. [1 ]
Alpenidze, Diana N. [5 ]
Kovalik, Vladislav V. [1 ]
Zinnatulina, Bella R. [1 ]
Grigorjeva, Irina, V [1 ]
Andreeva, Alena T. [3 ]
机构
[1] GEROPHARM, R&D Ctr, Degtyarny Lane 11B St, St Petersburg 191144, Russia
[2] Endocrinol Res Ctr, Dm Ulyanova St 11, Moscow 117036, Russia
[3] Almazov Natl Med Res Ctr, Inst Endocrinol, Akkuratova St 2, St Petersburg 197341, Russia
[4] Krasnoyarsk State Med Univ, Partizana Zheleznyaka St 1, Krasnoyarsk 660022, Russia
[5] City Polyclin 117,Simonova St 5-1, St Petersburg 194358, Russia
关键词
biosimilar; endocrinology/metabolism; GP-Asp30; immunogenicity; insulin aspart; phase III study; COMPLICATIONS; MELLITUS;
D O I
10.2217/cer-2021-0232
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of insulin Aspart-Mix biosimilar candidate GP40081 (GP-Asp30) compared with NovoMix (R) 30 (NN-Asp30). Materials & methods: In a randomized open-label, active-controlled, 26-week non-inferiority clinical trial 264 patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus were randomized 1:1 to receive once-daily GP-Asp30 or NN-Asp30. The primary safety end point was the immune response rate. Efficacy outcomes were a mean change in HbA1c (primary), frequency of achieving a glycemic g fasting plasma glucose levels, 7-point glucose profiles, and insulin doses. Results: The immune response developed in 10/126 (8%) participants in the GP-Asp30 group and in 10/125 (8%) participants in the NN-Asp30 group (p = 1.000). The mean difference in HbA1c change between groups was 0.12 (95%CI[-0.14, 0.38]). Other secondary efficacy and safety outcomes weren't statistically different between the two groups. Conclusion: GP-Asp30 demonstrated similar safety and efficacy compared with NN-Asp30 and may be considered a biosimilar insulin.
引用
收藏
页码:1337 / 1347
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficacy and safety of a combination of miglitol, metformin and insulin aspart in the treatment of type 2 diabetes
    Ke, Tingyu
    Cheng, Guoliang
    Tan, Liping
    Zhou, Xiangming
    Miao, Yuanyuan
    Du, Shigang
    Wang, Jia
    Pan, Yi
    Bi, Jingjie
    Zhao, Lin
    Zhi, Yunxia
    Zhao, Ling
    TROPICAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 20 (10) : 2171 - 2177
  • [32] 28-week, randomized, multicenter, open-label, parallel-group phase III trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of biphasic insulin aspart 70 thrice-daily injections vs twice-daily injections of biphasic insulin aspart 30 in patients with type 2 diabetes
    Kadowaki, Takashi
    Nishida, Tomoyuki
    Kaku, Kohei
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES INVESTIGATION, 2010, 1 (03) : 103 - 110
  • [33] Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Insulin Aspart in People with Type 2 Diabetes, as Biphasic Insulin Aspart or with Basal Insulin: Findings from the Multinational, Non-Interventional A1chieve Study
    Hajjaji, Issam
    Shah, Siddharth
    Li, Yuxiu
    Prusty, Vinay
    Benabbas, Youcef
    Home, Philip D.
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2014, 5 (01) : 113 - 126
  • [34] Lower rates of hypoglycemia during maintenance treatment with insulin degludec/insulin aspart versus biphasic insulin aspart 30: a combined analysis of two Phase 3a studies in type 2 diabetes
    Christiansen, Jens Sandahl
    Niskanen, Leo
    Rasmussen, Soren
    Johansen, Thue
    Fulcher, Greg
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2016, 8 (05) : 720 - 728
  • [35] Baseline characteristics of the Indian cohort from the IMPROVE™ study: a multinational, observational study of biphasic insulin aspart 30 treatment for type 2 diabetes
    Shah, Siddharth
    Das, A. K.
    Kumar, Ajay
    Unnikrishnan, A. G.
    Kalra, Sanjay
    Baruah, M. P.
    Ganapathi, B.
    Sahay, R. K.
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2009, 26 (03) : 325 - 335
  • [36] Cost-effectiveness of insulin degludec/insulin aspart versus biphasic insulin aspart in Chinese population with type 2 diabetes
    Luo, Qiong
    Zhou, Li
    Zhou, Naitong
    Hu, Ming
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [37] Biosimilar Insulin Aspart Premix SAR341402 Mix 70/30 Versus Originator Insulin Aspart Mix 70/30 (NovoMix 30) in People with Diabetes: A 26-Week, Randomized, Open-Label Trial (GEMELLI M)
    S. R. Aravind
    Kiran P. Singh
    Grace Aquitania
    Liliia Mogylnytska
    Alsu G. Zalevskaya
    Beata Matyjaszek-Matuszek
    Karin Wernicke-Panten
    My-Liên Nguyên-Pascal
    Suzanne Pierre
    Baerbel Rotthaeuser
    Daniel Kramer
    Bhaswati Mukherjee
    Diabetes Therapy, 2022, 13 : 1053 - 1071
  • [38] Biosimilar Insulin Aspart Premix SAR341402 Mix 70/30 Versus Originator Insulin Aspart Mix 70/30 (NovoMix 30) in People with Diabetes: A 26-Week, Randomized, Open-Label Trial (GEMELLI M)
    Aravind, S. R.
    Singh, Kiran P.
    Aquitania, Grace
    Mogylnytska, Liliia
    Zalevskaya, Alsu G.
    Matyjaszek-Matuszek, Beata
    Wernicke-Panten, Karin
    Nguyen-Pascal, My-Lien
    Pierre, Suzanne
    Rotthaeuser, Baerbel
    Kramer, Daniel
    Mukherjee, Bhaswati
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2022, 13 (05) : 1053 - 1071
  • [39] Indirect comparison of efficacy and safety of insulin glargine/lixisenatide and insulin degludec/insulin aspart in type 2 diabetes patients not controlled on basal insulin
    Jammah, Anwar Ali
    PRIMARY CARE DIABETES, 2021, 15 (01) : 132 - 137
  • [40] Treat-to-target comparison between once daily biphasic insulin aspart 30 and insulin glargine in Chinese and Japanese insulin-naive subjects with type 2 diabetes
    Yang, Wenying
    Xu, Xiangjin
    Liu, Xiaomin
    Yang, Gangyi
    Seino, Yutaka
    Andersen, Henning
    Jinnouchi, Hideaki
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2013, 29 (12) : 1599 - 1608