3D Microendoscopic Electrical Impedance Tomography for Margin Assessment During Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy

被引:20
作者
Mahara, Aditya [1 ]
Khan, Shadab [1 ]
Murphy, Ethan K. [1 ]
Schned, Alan R. [2 ,3 ]
Hyams, Elias S. [2 ,3 ]
Halter, Ryan J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Dartmouth Coll, Thayer Sch Engn, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[2] Dartmouth Coll, Geisel Sch Med, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[3] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Lebanon, NH 03766 USA
关键词
Electrical impedance tomography; microendoscopic probe; prostate cancer; surgical margin assessment; POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; CAVERNOUS NERVES; EIT; SPECTROSCOPY; SYSTEM; IMAGES; RECONSTRUCTION; ALGORITHMS; ELECTRODES;
D O I
10.1109/TMI.2015.2407833
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Radially configured microendoscopic electrical impedance probes intended for intraoperative surgical margin assessment during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) were examined through simulation, bench-top experimentation, and ex vivo tissue studies. Three probe designs with 8, 9, and 17 electrodes, respectively, were analyzed through finite element method based simulations. One mm diameter spherical inclusions (sigma(inclusion) = 1 S/m) are positioned at various locations within a hemispherical background (sigma(inclusion) = 0.1 S/m) of radius 5 mm. An 8-electrode configuration is not able to localize the inclusion at these positions while 9 and 17-electrode configurations are able to accurately reconstruct the inclusion at maximum depth of 1 mm and 3 mm, respectively. All three probe designs were constructed and evaluated using saline phantoms and ex vivo porcine and human prostate tissues. The 17-electrode probe performed best in saline phantom studies, accurately reconstructing high contrast, 1-mm-diameter metal cylindrical inclusions in a saline bath (sigma(saline) = 0.1 S/m) with a position and area error of 0.46 mm and 0.84 mm(2), respectively. Additionally, the 17-electrode probe was able to adequately distinguish cancerous from benign tissues in three ex vivo human prostates. Simulations, bench-top saline experiments, and ex vivo tissue sampling suggest that for intraoperative surgical margin assessment during RALP, the 17-electrode probe (as compared to an 8 and 9 electrode probe) will be necessary to provide sufficient accuracy and sensitivity.
引用
收藏
页码:1590 / 1601
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Cancer Facts and Figures
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, McMaster-Carr-G9 Garolite
[3]  
Aristovich K., 2014, P 15 INT C BIOM APPL, V604, P46
[4]   A method for reconstructing tomographic images of evoked neural activity with electrical impedance tomography using intracranial planar arrays [J].
Aristovich, Kirill Y. ;
dos Santos, Gustavo Sato ;
Packham, Brett C. ;
Holder, David S. .
PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2014, 35 (06) :1095-1109
[5]   Intraoperative Tissue Identification Using Rapid Evaporative Ionization Mass Spectrometry [J].
Balog, Julia ;
Sasi-Szabo, Laszlo ;
Kinross, James ;
Lewis, Matthew R. ;
Muirhead, Laura J. ;
Veselkov, Kirill ;
Mirnezami, Reza ;
Dezso, Balazs ;
Damjanovich, Laszlo ;
Darzi, Ara ;
Nicholson, Jeremy K. ;
Takats, Zoltan .
SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2013, 5 (194)
[6]   Electrical impedance tomography reconstruction for three-dimensional imaging of the prostate [J].
Borsic, A. ;
Halter, R. ;
Wan, Y. ;
Hartov, A. ;
Paulsen, K. D. .
PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2010, 31 (08) :S1-S16
[7]   Fiberoptic imaging of cavernous nerves in vivo [J].
Boyette, Lisa B. ;
Reardon, Michael A. ;
Mirelman, Andrew J. ;
Kirkley, Terry D. ;
Lysiak, Jeffrey J. ;
Tuttle, Jeremy B. ;
Steers, William D. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (06) :2694-2700
[8]  
Casas O., 1999, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V873, P59
[9]   A 3D electrical impedance tomography (EIT) system for breast cancer detection [J].
Cherepenin, V ;
Karpov, A ;
Korjenevsky, A ;
Kornienko, V ;
Mazaletskaya, A ;
Mazourov, D ;
Meister, D .
PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2001, 22 (01) :9-18
[10]   An electrical impedance tomography system for gynecological application GIT with a tiny electrode array [J].
Cherepenin, V. A. ;
Gulyaev, Y., V ;
Korjenevsky, A., V ;
Sapetsky, S. A. ;
Tuykin, T. S. .
PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2012, 33 (05) :849-862