Current use and barriers and facilitators for implementation of standardised measures in physical therapy in the Netherlands

被引:139
|
作者
Swinkels, Raymond A. H. M. [1 ,2 ]
van Peppen, Roland P. S. [3 ]
Wittink, Harriet [3 ,4 ]
Custers, Jan W. H. [5 ,6 ]
Beurskens, Anna J. H. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Zuyd Univ Appl Sci, Dept Phys Therapy, Heerlen, Netherlands
[2] Zuyd Univ Appl Sci, Ctr Res Auton & Participat People Chron Illnesses, Heerlen, Netherlands
[3] Utrecht Univ Appl Sci, Dept Phys Therapy, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Utrecht Univ Appl Sci, Res Ctr Innovat Hlth Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Univ Appl Sci, Amsterdam Sch Hlth Profess, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Royal Dutch Soc Phys Therapy KNGF, Dept Sci, Amersfoort, Netherlands
关键词
LOW-BACK-PAIN; OUTCOME MEASURES; PHYSIOTHERAPY MANAGEMENT; MEASUREMENT TOOLS; KNOWLEDGE; VALIDATION; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2474-12-106
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In many countries, the need for physical therapists to use standardised measures has been recognised and is recommended in clinical practice guidelines. Research has shown a lack of clinimetric knowledge and clinical application of measurement instruments in daily practice may hamper implementation of these guidelines. Objectives: The aims of our study were a) to investigate the current use of measurement instruments by Dutch physical therapists; b) to investigate the facilitators and barriers in using measurement instruments. Methods: To get a complete and valid overview of relevant barriers and facilitators, different methods of data collection were used. We conducted a literature search, semi-structured interviews with 20 physical therapists and an online survey. Results: Facilitators are the fact that most therapists indicated a positive attitude and were convinced of the advantages of the use of measurement instruments. The most important barriers to the use of measurement instruments included physical therapists' competence and problems in changing behaviour, practice organisation (no room; no time) and the unavailability and feasibility of measurement instruments. Furthermore, physical therapists indicated the need to have a core set of measurement instruments with a short user's instruction on application, scoring and interpretation. Conclusions: The main barriers are on the level of the physical therapist (lack of knowledge; not focusing on the use of outcome measures) and organisation (lack of time; availability; lack of management support). There seems to be a disparity between what physical therapists say and what they do. The majority of participating physical therapists indicated a positive attitude and were convinced of the advantages of the use of measurement instruments. However, the main problem for physical therapists is when to use which instrument for what patient (lack of knowledge). Furthermore, physical therapists indicated a need to compile a core set of measurement instruments with instructions concerning application, scoring and interpretation. Based on the identified factors, a number of strategies will be developed and evaluated in future studies.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Implementation and use of standardized outcome measures by physical therapists in Saudi Arabia: barriers, facilitators and perceptions
    Al-Muqiren, Tahani N.
    Al-Eisa, Einas S.
    Alghadir, Ahmad H.
    Anwer, Shahnawaz
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2017, 17
  • [2] Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of pain neuroscience education in the current Lebanese physical therapist health care approach: a qualitative study
    Najem, C.
    Wijma, A. J.
    Meeus, M.
    Cagnie, B.
    Ayoubi, F.
    Van Oosterwijck, J.
    De Meulemeester, K.
    Van Wilgen, C. P.
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2024, 46 (03) : 524 - 532
  • [3] Facilitators and Barriers for Using Outcome Measuring Tools in Physical Therapy Practice
    Ayub, Rahat
    Awan, Somia Sabeeh
    Rizwan, Muhamamd
    Majeed, Rabia
    Jawa, Rabia
    Ilyas, Tamknat
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2021, 15 (06): : 2126 - 2129
  • [4] Facilitators and Barriers to the Use of Outcome Measures by Certified Lymphedema Therapists
    Doubblestein, David Aaron
    Spinelli, Bryan A.
    Goldberg, Allon
    Larson, Cathy A.
    Yorke, Amy M.
    REHABILITATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 41 (03) : 121 - 128
  • [5] Barriers to and Facilitators in the Implementation of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Youth Anxiety in the Community
    Ringle, Vanesa A.
    Read, Kendra L.
    Edmunds, Julie M.
    Brodman, Douglas M.
    Kendall, Philip C.
    Barg, Frances
    Beidas, Rinad S.
    PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2015, 66 (09) : 938 - 945
  • [6] Barriers and facilitators to implementation of outcome measures among physiotherapists in Nepal: A mixed-methods study
    Pathak, Anupa
    Abbott, J. Haxby
    Bajracharya, Nibha
    Gurung, Gagan
    Nepal, Govinda Mani
    Sharma, Saurab
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2023, 68
  • [7] A Survey on the Use of Outcome Measures during Physical Therapy Interventions by Physical Therapists in Korea
    Lim, Jae-Hyun
    Kim, So-Yeong
    Kim, Byeong-Geun
    HEALTHCARE, 2023, 11 (22)
  • [8] Physical Therapists' Use of Functional Electrical Stimulation for Clients With Stroke: Frequency, Barriers, and Facilitators
    Auchstaetter, Nolan
    Luc, Juliana
    Lukye, Stacey
    Lynd, Kaylea
    Schemenauer, Shelby
    Whittaker, Maura
    Musselman, Kristin E.
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2016, 96 (07): : 995 - 1005
  • [9] Outcome measures in physiotherapy management of patients with stroke: a survey into self-reported use, and barriers to and facilitators for use
    Van Peppen, Roland
    Maissan, Francois
    Van Genderen, Frank
    Van Dolder, Rob
    Van Meeteren, Nico
    PHYSIOTHERAPY RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 13 (04) : 255 - 270
  • [10] Using medication-assisted treatment for substance use disorders: Evidence of barriers and facilitators of implementation
    Roman, Paul M.
    Abraham, Amanda J.
    Knudsen, Hannah K.
    ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2011, 36 (06) : 584 - 589