IMMEDIATION AND CONTRADICTION IN TEST PRACTICE BY VIDEOCONFERENCE. AN ANALYSIS FROM THE SANCTIONING ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

被引：0
作者：
Bauza Martorell, Felio Jose [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Islas Baleares, Derecho Adm, Palma De Mallorca, Illes Balears, Spain
来源：
REVISTA GENERAL DE DERECHO ADMINISTRATIVO | 2022年 / 59期
关键词：
Immediation; contradiction; videoconference; right of defense; sanctioning procedure;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号：
0301 ;
摘要：
Positive law does not contemplate, among the principles of administrative sanctioning law, that of contradiction, which is inherent to the right of defense and is integrated into the foundation of the rule of law; or the immediacy, which is again crucial to ensure the faithful and exact assessment of the evidence. In this study we analyze whether the immediacy, conceived as the instructor's personal and direct contact with an accused or a witness, is fulfilled with full satisfaction when the test is carried out digitally, that is, by videoconference; or if, on the contrary, the instructor ceases to perceive gestures and features that would allow a more accurate assessment of the test.
引用
收藏
页数：24
相关论文
共 45 条
[11]  
CANO CAMPOS T, 1995, REV ESP DERECHO CONS
[12]  
CASINO RUBIO M., 2016, REV GEN DERECHO OCT
[13]  
Castaneda EduardoSotelo., 1986, Revista de Administracion Publica N˚109, P185
[14]  
CHIOVENDA G., 1949, ENSAYOS DERECHO PROC, P494
[15]  
CLAVERO AREVALO M. F., 1952, REV ADM PUBLICA, P96
[16]  
DE LA OLIVA A., 1997, TRIBUNALES JUSTICIA, P980
[17]  
DEENTERRIA EG, 2007, ADM ESPANOLA
[18]  
DELGADO MARTIN J., 2020, REV JURISPRUDENCIA
[19]  
Ekman P., 2017, El rostro de las emociones. Que nos revelan las expresiones faciales
[20]  
FERNANDEZ LOPEZ M., 2007, EJEMPLAR DEDICADO 21
12345