Economic evaluation of sunitinib malate in second-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Finland

被引:50
作者
Purmonen, Timo [1 ]
Martikainen, Janne A. [1 ]
Soini, Erkki J. O. [1 ,2 ]
Kataja, Vesa [3 ,4 ]
Vuorinen, Riikka-Liisa [5 ]
Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, Pirkko-Liisa [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kuopio, Ctr Pharmaceut Policy & Econom, Dept Social Pharm, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland
[2] Univ Kuopio, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland
[3] Univ Kuopio, Dept Oncol, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland
[4] Vaasa Cent Hosp, Dept Oncol, Vaasa, Finland
[5] Turku Univ, Sch Med, Turku, Finland
[6] Tampere Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Tampere, Finland
[7] Univ Tampere, Sch Med, FIN-33101 Tampere, Finland
关键词
costs; cost analysis; cost-effectiveness analysis; Finland; renal cell carcinoma; sunitinib;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.02.013
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Cytokine therapy is currently used as first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Until recently, treatments with proven efficacy after the failure of first-line cytokine therapy were not available. In recent clinical trials, sunitinib has been associated with good response rates in patients with mRCC. Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the cost-effectiveness of sunitinib as second-line therapy for cytokine-refractory mRCC compared with current routine clinical practice in Finland (ie, best supportive care [BSC], including palliative biochemotherapy). Methods: A probabilistic decision-analytic model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of sunitimb. Data were gathered from clinical trials, literature sources, and expert opinions, as well as from a local sample (n = 39) from 2 university hospitals in Finland. Clinical experts treating patients with mRCC in Finland provided the information on care practices of prescribing sunitinib. The analysis was conducted from the perspective of the health care payer in Finland. Results: According to estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), 1 progression-free month gained cost epsilon 4802 (2005 Euros); I life-year gained cost epsilon 30,831; and 1 quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained cost epsilon 43,698, compared with BSC, in the treatment of mRCC. The expected mean cost in BSC was epsilon 5543. When parameter uncertainty was considered, the probability of sunitimb being the more cost-effective choice of treatment was similar to 70% at the willingness-to-pay level of epsilon 45,000/QALY gained. Conclusions: Based on the results of this cost-effectiveness analysis, sunitimb is potentially cost-effective as a second-line treatment of mRCC compared with the treatment currently practiced in Finnish hospitals. The ICER (epsilon/QALY gained) obtained in the present study was less than the value considered suitable for novel oncology treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:382 / 392
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Estimates of cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 1995
    Bray, F
    Sankila, R
    Ferlay, J
    Parkin, DM
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 38 (01) : 99 - 166
  • [2] Probabilistic analysis of cost-effectiveness models: Choosing between treatment strategies for gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Briggs, AH
    Goeree, R
    Blackhouse, G
    O'Brien, BJ
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2002, 22 (04) : 290 - 308
  • [3] Comprehensive decision analytical modelling in economic evaluation: a Bayesian approach
    Cooper, NJ
    Sutton, AJ
    Abrams, KR
    Turner, D
    Wailoo, A
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2004, 13 (03) : 203 - 226
  • [4] Does NICE have a cost-effectiveness threshold and what other factors influence its decisions? A binary choice analysis
    Devlin, N
    Parkin, D
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2004, 13 (05) : 437 - 452
  • [5] ELSON PJ, 1988, CANCER RES, V48, P7310
  • [6] *EMEA, SUN MAL SUMM PROD C
  • [7] *EUROQOL GROUP, ED 5D INSTR DESCR VA
  • [8] Representing uncertainty: The role of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves
    Fenwick, E
    Claxton, K
    Sculpher, M
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2001, 10 (08) : 779 - 787
  • [9] Interferon alfa-2b three times daily and thalidomide in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma
    Hernberg, M
    Virkkunen, P
    Bono, P
    Atinen, H
    Mäenpää, H
    Joensuu, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (20) : 3770 - 3776
  • [10] HUDER GR, 2004, PHASE 2 STUDY SINGLE