Overview of Performance and Analytical Modeling Techniques for Electromagnetic Heating and Applications to Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage Process Startup

被引:14
|
作者
Ghannadi, Sahar [1 ]
Irani, Mazda [2 ]
Chalaturnyk, Rick [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Petr Engn, Edmonton, AB T6G 2M7, Canada
[2] Suncor Energy, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2M7, Canada
来源
SPE JOURNAL | 2016年 / 21卷 / 02期
关键词
HEAVY-OIL-RECOVERY; SAGD STARTUP; SANDS; BITUMEN; INJECTION; CONDUCTIVITY; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.2118/178427-PA
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业];
学科分类号
0820 ;
摘要
Steam-assisted gravity drainage is the method of choice to extract bitumen from Athabasca oil-sand reservoirs in Western Canada. Under reservoir conditions, bitumen is immobile because of high viscosity, and its typically high level of saturation limits the injectivity of steam. In current industry practice, steam is circulated within injection and production wells. Operators keep the steam circulating until mobile bitumen breaks through the producer and communication is established between the injector and the producer. The "startup" phase is a time-consuming process taking three or more months with no oil production. A variety of processes could be used to minimize the length of the startup phase, such as electromagnetic (EM) heating in either the induction (medium frequency) or radio-frequency ranges. Knowledge of the size of the hot zone formed by steam circulation and of the benefits of simultaneous EM-heating techniques increases understanding of the startup process and helps to minimize startup duration. The aim of the present work is to introduce an analytical model to predict startup duration for steam circulation with and without EM heating. Results reveal that resistive (electrothermal) heating with/without brine injection cannot be a preferable method for mobilizing the bitumen in startup phase. Induction slightly decreases startup time at frequencies smaller than 10 kHz, and at 100 kHz it can reduce startup time to less than two months.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 333
页数:23
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Analytical Modeling of Emulsion Flow at the Edge of a Steam Chamber During a Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage Process
    Mojarad, Mahdie
    Dehghanpour, Hassan
    SPE JOURNAL, 2016, 21 (02): : 353 - 363
  • [2] The Effect of Clay Type on Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage Performance
    Kar, Taniya
    Mukhametshina, Albina
    Unal, Yasin
    Hascakir, Berna
    JOURNAL OF CANADIAN PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 54 (06): : 412 - 423
  • [3] Convection beyond the Steam Chamber Interface in the Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage Process
    Wang, Fei
    Yang, Zhengda
    Wang, Xinwei
    Lin, Riyi
    ACS OMEGA, 2020, 5 (47): : 30478 - 30487
  • [4] Heating Strategies for Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage-Startup Phase
    Guindon, Leah
    JOURNAL OF CANADIAN PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 54 (02): : 81 - 84
  • [5] Drained/Undrained-Zones Boundary in Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage Process
    Irani, Mazda
    Gates, Ian
    SPE JOURNAL, 2016, 21 (05): : 1721 - 1742
  • [6] Understanding the Convection Heat-Transfer Mechanism in the Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage Process
    Irani, Mazda
    Gates, Ian
    SPE JOURNAL, 2013, 18 (06): : 1202 - 1216
  • [7] On Temperature-Falloff Interpretation in the Circulation Phase of the Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage Process
    Irani, Mazda
    Ghannadi, Sahar
    SPE JOURNAL, 2019, 24 (03): : 1002 - 1015
  • [8] A Multistage Theoretical Model To Characterize the Liquid Level During Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage Process
    Yang, Yang
    Huang, Shijun
    Liu, Yang
    Song, Qianlan
    Wei, Shaolei
    Xiong, Hao
    SPE JOURNAL, 2017, 22 (01): : 327 - 338
  • [9] The Role of Emulsions in Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage (SAGD) Oil-Production Process: A Review
    Ansari, Shadi
    Sabbagh, Reza
    Yusuf, Yishak
    Nobes, David S.
    SPE JOURNAL, 2020, 25 (02): : 969 - 989
  • [10] Characterizing the Effects of Lean Zones and Shale Distribution in Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage Recovery Performance
    Wang, Cui
    Leung, Juliana Y.
    SPE RESERVOIR EVALUATION & ENGINEERING, 2015, 18 (03) : 329 - 345