THERMODYNAMIC EVALUATION OF ENERGY SYSTEMS FOR THE COPRODUCTION OF SYNTHETIC BIOFUELS AND ELECTRICITY

被引:0
作者
Susmozas, Ana [1 ]
Cruz, Pedro L. [1 ]
Iribarren, Diego [1 ]
Peters, Jens F. [1 ]
Dufour, Javier [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inst IMDEA Energia, Mostoles 28935, Spain
[2] Rey Juan Carlos Univ, Mostoles 28933, Spain
来源
PAPERS OF THE 22ND EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE: SETTING THE COURSE FOR A BIOBASED ECONOMY | 2014年
关键词
biofuel; biomass to liquid (BtL); exergy; hydrogen; power generation; process simulation; GASIFICATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The coproduction of synthetic biofuels and electricity through the Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis coupled with power generation could be a promising pathway in order to green the energy sector. We present a system based on lignocellulosic biomass gasification coupled with FT synthesis and electricity generation through a combined-cycle scheme. In addition to a base case study, three modifications of the base case are considered. These modifications include: autothermal reforming (ATR) of a fraction of the FT tail gas to increase the fuel yield; combustion of a fraction of the conditioned biosyngas to increase electricity production; ormembrane separation of the FT tail gas to increase the fuel yield. The thermodynamic evaluation of the four systems is carried out through exergy analysis. In order to obtain the data required for the analysis, the four bioenergy systems are simulated using Aspen Plus (R). Global exergy efficiencies of 23.7-28.2% are calculated, depending on the plant configuration. The membrane separation and ATR systems are identified as the best options according to thermodynamic criteria. In contrast, the biosyngas combustion system shows the least favourable results. The gasification subsystem is found to contribute more than 50% to global exergy destruction, showing an efficiency of 67.8%. The power generation subsystem also shows a high contribution to the global exergy destruction (18.5-28.4%) due to increased fuel consumption and significant irreversibilities of the combined-cycle power plant.
引用
收藏
页码:1204 / 1207
页数:4
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, WORLD EN OUTL 2013
[2]  
Bejan A, 1996, THERMALDESIGN ANDOPT
[3]  
Brown RC, 2011, CONVERSION FUELS CHE
[4]   LCA of poplar bioenergy system compared with Brassica carinata energy crop and natural gas in regional scenario [J].
Gasol, Caries M. ;
Gabarrell, Xavier ;
Anton, Assumpcio ;
Rigola, Miquel ;
Carrasco, Juan ;
Ciria, Pilar ;
Rieradevall, Joan .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2009, 33 (01) :119-129
[5]  
Iribarren D, 2013, 6 INT C LIF CYCL MAN
[6]   Life cycle assessment of transportation fuels from biomass pyrolysis [J].
Iribarren, Diego ;
Peters, Jens F. ;
Dufour, Javier .
FUEL, 2012, 97 :812-821
[7]   Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production from biomass gasification systems [J].
Kalinci, Yildiz ;
Hepbasli, Arif ;
Dincer, Ibrahim .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2012, 37 (19) :14026-14039
[8]  
Kirubakaran V, RENEW SUSTAIN ENERGY, V13, P179
[9]  
Kotas TJ, 2012, The exergy method of thermal plant analysis
[10]   Making Fischer-Tropsch Fuels and Electricity from Coal and Biomass: Performance and Cost Analysis [J].
Liu, Guangjian ;
Larson, Eric D. ;
Williams, Robert H. ;
Kreutz, Thomas G. ;
Guo, Xiangbo .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2011, 25 (01) :415-437