Evaluation of the seismic performance of suspended zipper column concentrically braced steel frames

被引:28
|
作者
Wijesundara, K. K. [1 ]
Nascimbene, R. [2 ]
Rassati, Gian A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Peradeniya, Fac Engn, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
[2] European Ctr Training & Res Earthquake Engn EUCEN, Via Ferrara 1, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
[3] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Civil & Architectural Engn, Cincinnati, OH USA
关键词
Suspended zipper concentric braced frame; Strut-to-ground concentric braced frame; Conventional braced frames; Nonlinear time history analyses; DESIGN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.09.003
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The performance of the most common type of concentric braced configuration, i.e. Chevron braces, is governed by buckling of first story braces in compression, resulting in a localization of the failure. To improve the performance of chevron concentric braced frames, zipper columns were introduced to transfer the unbalanced forces; over strength braces were further introduced to avoid the complete collapse of the frame. Such concentric braced frames are called suspended zipper concentric braced frames. The objective of this study is to evaluate the seismic performance of suspended zipper concentric braced frames designed according to Eurocode 8 and to compare their performance with conventional concentric braced configurations. It is important to highlight that this study introduces a novel design methodology to size braces, zipper columns, beams and columns in suspended zipper frames. For this purpose, two concentric braced frame structures from each suspended zipper configuration and stud-to-ground configuration are designed and analysed for a ground motion with a probability of exceedance equal to 10% in 50 years, i.e. a return period of 475 years, with peak ground acceleration of 03 g. Based on the comparison of results, it can be concluded that the performance of suspended zipper frame is better than that of conventional concentrically braced frames in medium-rise buildings, but not in low-rise buildings. Furthermore, the novel design methodology is proven to be satisfactory in sizing the structural elements of suspended zipper concentric braced frames when considering the inelastic time history analyses results. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:452 / 461
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Influence of masonry infill on the seismic performance of concentrically braced frames
    Jazany, Roohollah Ahmady
    Hajirasouliha, Iman
    Farshchi, Hamidreza
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2013, 88 : 150 - 163
  • [32] Stability of Steel Columns in Steel Concentrically Braced Frames Subjected to Seismic Loading
    Toutant, Guillaume
    Minouei, Yasaman Balazadeh
    Imanpour, Ali
    Koboevic, Sanda
    Tremblay, Robert
    STRUCTURES CONGRESS 2017: BUILDINGS AND SPECIAL STRUCTURES, 2017, : 143 - 154
  • [33] Effect of brace sections on seismic performance of concentrically braced frames
    Ince, Gulhan
    Girgin, Ayse
    PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES-PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITESI MUHENDISLIK BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2024, 30 (02): : 240 - 256
  • [34] The seismic response of concentrically braced moment-resisting steel frames
    Martinelli, L
    Mulas, MG
    Perotti, F
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 1996, 25 (11): : 1275 - 1299
  • [35] Influence of brace slenderness on the seismic response of concentrically braced steel frames
    Tremblay, R
    BEHAVIOUR OF STEEL STRUCTURES IN SEISMIC AREAS, 2000, : 527 - 534
  • [36] The behaviour of concentrically braced steel frames under strong seismic actions
    Martinelli, L
    Mulas, MG
    Perotti, F
    ADVANCES IN STEEL STRUCTURES, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1996, : 1035 - 1040
  • [37] The seismic response of concentrically braced moment-resisting steel frames
    Dept of Structural Eng, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, Milano 20133, Italy
    Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn, 11 (1275-1299):
  • [38] Ductility of steel connections in concentrically braced frames under seismic forces
    Wallace, DG
    Goldsworthy, HM
    Mansell, DS
    Wilson, JL
    MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES AND MATERIALS, 1997, : 317 - 322
  • [39] Seismic demand on column splices in concentrically braced frames considering brace fracture
    Faytarouni, Mahmoud
    Shen, Jay
    Seker, Onur
    Akbas, Bulent
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2020, 175
  • [40] Inelastic seismic performance of brace connections in steel tension-only concentrically braced frames
    Hartley, J.
    Rogers, C. A.
    Castonguay, P. X.
    Tremblay, R.
    STESSA 2012: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BEHAVIOUR OF STEEL STRUCTURES IN SEISMIC AREAS, 2012, : 289 - 295