Evaluation of the seismic performance of suspended zipper column concentrically braced steel frames

被引:28
作者
Wijesundara, K. K. [1 ]
Nascimbene, R. [2 ]
Rassati, Gian A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Peradeniya, Fac Engn, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
[2] European Ctr Training & Res Earthquake Engn EUCEN, Via Ferrara 1, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
[3] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Civil & Architectural Engn, Cincinnati, OH USA
关键词
Suspended zipper concentric braced frame; Strut-to-ground concentric braced frame; Conventional braced frames; Nonlinear time history analyses; DESIGN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.09.003
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The performance of the most common type of concentric braced configuration, i.e. Chevron braces, is governed by buckling of first story braces in compression, resulting in a localization of the failure. To improve the performance of chevron concentric braced frames, zipper columns were introduced to transfer the unbalanced forces; over strength braces were further introduced to avoid the complete collapse of the frame. Such concentric braced frames are called suspended zipper concentric braced frames. The objective of this study is to evaluate the seismic performance of suspended zipper concentric braced frames designed according to Eurocode 8 and to compare their performance with conventional concentric braced configurations. It is important to highlight that this study introduces a novel design methodology to size braces, zipper columns, beams and columns in suspended zipper frames. For this purpose, two concentric braced frame structures from each suspended zipper configuration and stud-to-ground configuration are designed and analysed for a ground motion with a probability of exceedance equal to 10% in 50 years, i.e. a return period of 475 years, with peak ground acceleration of 03 g. Based on the comparison of results, it can be concluded that the performance of suspended zipper frame is better than that of conventional concentrically braced frames in medium-rise buildings, but not in low-rise buildings. Furthermore, the novel design methodology is proven to be satisfactory in sizing the structural elements of suspended zipper concentric braced frames when considering the inelastic time history analyses results. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:452 / 461
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
AISC-LRFD, 2016, Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification for structural steel buildings
[2]  
AMBRASEYS N, 2000, DISSEMINATION EUROPE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, 199111 EN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, 199311 CENENV
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2007, 19981 CENEN
[6]  
ASTANEHASL A, 2001, UCBCEESTEEL200103
[7]   NGA project strong-motion database [J].
Chiou, Brian ;
Darragh, Robert ;
Gregor, Nick ;
Silva, Walter .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2008, 24 (01) :23-44
[8]   The influence of beam stiffness on seismic response of chevron concentric bracings [J].
D'Aniello, Mario ;
Costanzo, Silvia ;
Landolfo, Raffaele .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2015, 112 :305-324
[9]  
Khatib IF, 1988, UCB/EERC-88/01
[10]   Numerical simulation of gusset plate connections with rectangular hollow section shape brace under quasi-static cyclic loading [J].
Nascimbene, R. ;
Rassati, G. A. ;
Wijesundara, K. K. .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2012, 70 :177-189