Feasibility and acceptability of introducing advance care planning on a thoracic medicine inpatient ward: an exploratory mixed method study

被引:12
作者
Hjorth, Nina Elisabeth [1 ,2 ]
Schaufel, Margrethe Aase [3 ,4 ]
Sigurdardottir, Katrin Ruth [4 ,5 ]
Haugen, Dagny R. Faksvag [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Haukeland Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Surg Serv, Specialist Palliat Care Team, Bergen, Norway
[2] Univ Bergen, Dept Clin Med K1, Bergen, Norway
[3] Haukeland Hosp, Dept Thorac Med, Bergen, Norway
[4] Haukeland Hosp, Western Norway, Reg Ctr Excellence Palliat Care, Bergen, Norway
[5] Haraldsplass Deaconess Hosp, Sunniva Ctr Palliat Care, Bergen, Norway
关键词
EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION; PALLIATIVE CARE; END; CANCER; DEFINITION; DESCRIBE; DISEASE; VIEWS; HOPE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000485
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and aims Advance care planning (ACP) is communication about wishes and preferences for end-of-life care. ACP is not routinely used in any Norwegian hospitals. We performed a pilot study (2014-2017) introducing ACP on a thoracic medicine ward in Norway. The aims of this study were to explore which topics patients discussed during ACP conversations and to assess how patients, relatives and clinicians experienced the acceptability and feasibility of performing ACP. Methods Conversations were led by a study nurse or physician using a semistructured guide, encouraging patients to talk freely. Each conversation was summarised in a report in the patient's medical record. At the end of the pilot period, clinicians discussed their experiences in focus group interviews. Reports and transcribed interviews were analysed using systematic text condensation. Results Fifty-one patients participated in ACP conversations (41-86 years; 9 COPD, 41 lung cancer, 1 lung fibrosis; 11 women); 18 were accompanied by a relative. Four themes emerged: (1) disturbing symptoms, (2) existential topics, (3) care planning and (4) important relationships. All participants appreciated the conversations. Clinicians (1 physician and 7 nurses) participated in two focus group interviews. Reports from ACP conversations revealed patient values previously unknown to clinicians; important information was passed on to primary care. Fearing they would deprive patients of hope, clinicians acted as gatekeepers for recruitment. Although they reported barriers during recruitment, many clinicians saw ACP as pertinent and called for time and skills to integrate it into their daily clinical practice. Conclusions Patients, relatives and clinicians showed a positive attitude towards ACP. Focusing on present and future symptom control may be an acceptable way to introduce ACP. Important aspects for implementing ACP in this patient group are management support, education, training, feasible routines and allocated time to perform the conversations.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Acceptability, Feasibility, and Efficacy Potential of a Multimodal Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Intervention to Address Psychosocial and Advance Care Planning Needs among Anxious and Depressed Adults with Metastatic Cancer
    Arch, Joanna J.
    Fishbein, Joel N.
    Ferris, Michelle C.
    Mitchell, Jill L.
    Levin, Michael E.
    Slivjak, Elizabeth T.
    Andorsky, David J.
    Kutner, Jean S.
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 23 (10) : 1380 - 1385
  • [32] Gamification for promoting advance care planning: A mixed-method systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Li
    Zhao, Ya-Yi
    Yang, Chen
    Chan, Helen Yue-Lai
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 35 (06) : 1005 - 1019
  • [33] The feasibility and acceptability of using virtual world technology for interprofessional education in palliative care: a mixed methods study
    Lee, Amy L.
    DeBest, Michelle
    Koeniger-Donohue, Rebecca
    Strowman, Shelley R.
    Mitchell, Suzanne E.
    JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2020, 34 (04) : 461 - 471
  • [34] Are specialist-provided end-of-life scenarios key to initiation of advance care planning in primary care? A mixed-methods study
    Poelman, Sophie W.
    Ermers, Daisy J. M.
    Schers, Henk J.
    Vissers, Kris C. P.
    Veldhoven, Carel M. M.
    Kuip, Evelien J. M.
    Perry, Marieke
    PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2024, : 1263 - 1271
  • [35] Advance care planning for frail elderly: are we missing a golden opportunity? A mixed-method systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Xinying
    Huang, Xin-Lin
    Wang, Wei-Jia
    Liao, Li
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (05):
  • [36] A mixed method feasibility and acceptability study of a flexible intervention based on acceptance and commitment therapy for patients with cancer
    Bourgognon, Francois
    Bechet, Denise
    Huin-Schohn, Cecile
    Strelow, Aurelia
    Demarche, Laetitia
    Guillou, Mireille
    Adam, Virginie
    Fall, Estelle
    Omorou, Abdou Yacoubou
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [37] When and how to discuss about palliative care and advance care planning with cancer patients: A mixed-methods study
    Trevizan, Fulvio Bergamo
    Paiva, Carlos Eduardo
    de Almeida, Laura Fiacadori
    de Oliveira, Marco Antonio
    Bruera, Eduardo
    Paiva, Bianca Sakamoto Ribeiro
    PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2024, 22 (02) : 387 - 395
  • [38] Implementing the care programme for the last days of life in an acute geriatric hospital ward: a phase 2 mixed method study
    Verhofstede, Rebecca
    Smets, Tinne
    Cohen, Joachim
    Costantini, Massimo
    Van den Noortgate, Nele
    Deliens, Luc
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2016, 15
  • [39] The development and feasibility study of Multidisciplinary Timely Undertaken Advance Care Planning conversations at the outpatient clinic: the MUTUAL intervention
    van Lummel, Eline V. T. J.
    Savelkoul, Claudia
    Stemerdink, Eva L. E.
    Tjan, Dave H. T.
    van Delden, Johannes J. M.
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2022, 21 (01)
  • [40] The development and feasibility study of Multidisciplinary Timely Undertaken Advance Care Planning conversations at the outpatient clinic: the MUTUAL intervention
    Eline V. T. J. van Lummel
    Claudia Savelkoul
    Eva L. E. Stemerdink
    Dave H. T. Tjan
    Johannes J. M. van Delden
    BMC Palliative Care, 21