Feasibility and acceptability of introducing advance care planning on a thoracic medicine inpatient ward: an exploratory mixed method study

被引:12
作者
Hjorth, Nina Elisabeth [1 ,2 ]
Schaufel, Margrethe Aase [3 ,4 ]
Sigurdardottir, Katrin Ruth [4 ,5 ]
Haugen, Dagny R. Faksvag [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Haukeland Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Surg Serv, Specialist Palliat Care Team, Bergen, Norway
[2] Univ Bergen, Dept Clin Med K1, Bergen, Norway
[3] Haukeland Hosp, Dept Thorac Med, Bergen, Norway
[4] Haukeland Hosp, Western Norway, Reg Ctr Excellence Palliat Care, Bergen, Norway
[5] Haraldsplass Deaconess Hosp, Sunniva Ctr Palliat Care, Bergen, Norway
关键词
EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION; PALLIATIVE CARE; END; CANCER; DEFINITION; DESCRIBE; DISEASE; VIEWS; HOPE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000485
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and aims Advance care planning (ACP) is communication about wishes and preferences for end-of-life care. ACP is not routinely used in any Norwegian hospitals. We performed a pilot study (2014-2017) introducing ACP on a thoracic medicine ward in Norway. The aims of this study were to explore which topics patients discussed during ACP conversations and to assess how patients, relatives and clinicians experienced the acceptability and feasibility of performing ACP. Methods Conversations were led by a study nurse or physician using a semistructured guide, encouraging patients to talk freely. Each conversation was summarised in a report in the patient's medical record. At the end of the pilot period, clinicians discussed their experiences in focus group interviews. Reports and transcribed interviews were analysed using systematic text condensation. Results Fifty-one patients participated in ACP conversations (41-86 years; 9 COPD, 41 lung cancer, 1 lung fibrosis; 11 women); 18 were accompanied by a relative. Four themes emerged: (1) disturbing symptoms, (2) existential topics, (3) care planning and (4) important relationships. All participants appreciated the conversations. Clinicians (1 physician and 7 nurses) participated in two focus group interviews. Reports from ACP conversations revealed patient values previously unknown to clinicians; important information was passed on to primary care. Fearing they would deprive patients of hope, clinicians acted as gatekeepers for recruitment. Although they reported barriers during recruitment, many clinicians saw ACP as pertinent and called for time and skills to integrate it into their daily clinical practice. Conclusions Patients, relatives and clinicians showed a positive attitude towards ACP. Focusing on present and future symptom control may be an acceptable way to introduce ACP. Important aspects for implementing ACP in this patient group are management support, education, training, feasible routines and allocated time to perform the conversations.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Development and Usability of an Advance Care Planning Website (My Voice) to Empower Patients With Heart Failure and Their Caregivers: Mixed Methods Study
    Malhotra, Chetna
    Yee, Alethea
    Ramakrishnan, Chandrika
    Kaurani, Sanam Naraindas
    Chua, Ivy
    Lakin, Joshua R.
    Sim, David
    Balakrishnan, Iswaree
    Ling, Vera Goh Jin
    Weiliang, Huang
    Ling, Lee Fong
    Pollak, Kathryn, I
    JMIR AGING, 2024, 7
  • [22] Measuring engagement in advance care planning: a cross-sectional multicentre feasibility study
    Howard, Michelle
    Bonham, Aaron J.
    Heyland, Daren K.
    Sudore, Rebecca
    Fassbender, Konrad
    Robinson, Carole A.
    McKenzie, Michael
    Elston, Dawn
    You, John J.
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (06):
  • [23] Implementing an Advance Care Planning Intervention in Community Settings with Older Latinos: A Feasibility Study
    Nedjat-Haiem, Frances R.
    Carrion, Iraida V.
    Gonzalez, Krystyna
    Quintana, Alejandra
    Ell, Kathleen
    O'Connell, Mary
    Thompson, Beti
    Mishra, Shiraz I.
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 20 (09) : 984 - 993
  • [24] From concept to practice, is multidimensional care the leading principle in hospice care? An exploratory mixed method study
    de Graaf, Everlien
    van Klinken, Merel
    Zweers, Danielle
    Teunissen, Saskia
    BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [25] A Retrospective Study Reviewing Interprofessional Advance Care Planning Group Discussions in Pulmonary Rehabilitation: A Proof-of-Concept and Feasibility Study
    Grossman, Daphna
    Katz, Amanda
    Lock, Karen
    Caraiscos, Valerie B.
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 2021, 36 (04) : 219 - 223
  • [26] A website to support people with dementia and their family caregivers in advance care planning: Results of a mixed-method evaluation study
    Dupont, Charless
    Smets, Tinne
    Monnet, Fanny
    Pivodic, Lara
    De Vleminck, Aline
    Van Audenhove, Chantal
    Van den Block, Lieve
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2024, 127
  • [27] Oncology Nurses' Communication Practices and Challenges Towards Advance Care Planning: A Sequential Explanatory Mixed-Method Study
    Shih, Yi-An
    Wang, Cheng
    Ali, Ali
    Huang, Xia
    Lu, Qian
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2025, 81 (02) : 1082 - 1094
  • [28] Healthcare Providers' Perceptions on the Timing of Initial Advance Care Planning Discussions in Japan: a Mixed-Methods Study
    Miyashita, Jun
    Kohno, Ayako
    Shimizu, Sayaka
    Kashiwazaki, Motohiro
    Kamihiro, Noriki
    Okawa, Kaoru
    Fujisaki, Masami
    Fukuhara, Shunichi
    Yamamoto, Yosuke
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 36 (10) : 2935 - 2942
  • [29] Feasibility and acceptability of advance care planning in elderly Italian and Greek speaking patients as compared to English-speaking patients: an Australian cross-sectional study
    Detering, Karen
    Sutton, Elizabeth
    Fraser, Scott
    Wallis, Kasey
    Silvester, William
    Mawren, Daveena
    Whiteside, Kathryn
    BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (08):
  • [30] Practitioners' perceptions of acceptability of a question prompt list about palliative care for advance care planning with people living with dementia and their family caregivers: a mixed-methods evaluation study
    van der Steen, Jenny T.
    Heck, Sten
    Juffermans, Carla C. M.
    Garvelink, Mirjam Marjolein
    Achterberg, Wilco P.
    Clayton, Josephine
    Thompson, Genevieve
    Koopmans, Raymond T. C. M.
    van der Linden, Yvette M.
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (04):