Feasibility and acceptability of introducing advance care planning on a thoracic medicine inpatient ward: an exploratory mixed method study

被引:12
|
作者
Hjorth, Nina Elisabeth [1 ,2 ]
Schaufel, Margrethe Aase [3 ,4 ]
Sigurdardottir, Katrin Ruth [4 ,5 ]
Haugen, Dagny R. Faksvag [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Haukeland Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Surg Serv, Specialist Palliat Care Team, Bergen, Norway
[2] Univ Bergen, Dept Clin Med K1, Bergen, Norway
[3] Haukeland Hosp, Dept Thorac Med, Bergen, Norway
[4] Haukeland Hosp, Western Norway, Reg Ctr Excellence Palliat Care, Bergen, Norway
[5] Haraldsplass Deaconess Hosp, Sunniva Ctr Palliat Care, Bergen, Norway
关键词
EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION; PALLIATIVE CARE; END; CANCER; DEFINITION; DESCRIBE; DISEASE; VIEWS; HOPE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000485
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and aims Advance care planning (ACP) is communication about wishes and preferences for end-of-life care. ACP is not routinely used in any Norwegian hospitals. We performed a pilot study (2014-2017) introducing ACP on a thoracic medicine ward in Norway. The aims of this study were to explore which topics patients discussed during ACP conversations and to assess how patients, relatives and clinicians experienced the acceptability and feasibility of performing ACP. Methods Conversations were led by a study nurse or physician using a semistructured guide, encouraging patients to talk freely. Each conversation was summarised in a report in the patient's medical record. At the end of the pilot period, clinicians discussed their experiences in focus group interviews. Reports and transcribed interviews were analysed using systematic text condensation. Results Fifty-one patients participated in ACP conversations (41-86 years; 9 COPD, 41 lung cancer, 1 lung fibrosis; 11 women); 18 were accompanied by a relative. Four themes emerged: (1) disturbing symptoms, (2) existential topics, (3) care planning and (4) important relationships. All participants appreciated the conversations. Clinicians (1 physician and 7 nurses) participated in two focus group interviews. Reports from ACP conversations revealed patient values previously unknown to clinicians; important information was passed on to primary care. Fearing they would deprive patients of hope, clinicians acted as gatekeepers for recruitment. Although they reported barriers during recruitment, many clinicians saw ACP as pertinent and called for time and skills to integrate it into their daily clinical practice. Conclusions Patients, relatives and clinicians showed a positive attitude towards ACP. Focusing on present and future symptom control may be an acceptable way to introduce ACP. Important aspects for implementing ACP in this patient group are management support, education, training, feasible routines and allocated time to perform the conversations.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Feasibility and acceptability of a culturally adapted advance care planning intervention for people living with advanced cancer and their families: A mixed methods study
    Lin, Cheng-Pei
    Evans, Catherine J.
    Koffman, Jonathan
    Chen, Ping-Jen
    Hou, Ming-Feng
    Harding, Richard
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 34 (05) : 651 - 666
  • [2] Normalising advance care planning in a general medicine service of a tertiary hospital: an exploratory study
    Scott, Ian A.
    Rajakaruna, Nalaka
    Shah, Darshan
    Miller, Leyton
    Reymond, Elizabeth
    Daly, Michael
    AUSTRALIAN HEALTH REVIEW, 2016, 40 (04) : 391 - 398
  • [3] A mixed method feasibility study of a patient- and family-centred advance care planning intervention for cancer patients
    Michael, Natasha
    O'Callaghan, Clare
    Baird, Angela
    Gough, Karla
    Krishnasamy, Mei
    Hiscock, Nathaniel
    Clayton, Josephine
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2015, 14
  • [4] A mixed method feasibility study of a patient- and family-centred advance care planning intervention for cancer patients
    Natasha Michael
    Clare O’Callaghan
    Angela Baird
    Karla Gough
    Mei Krishnasamy
    Nathaniel Hiscock
    Josephine Clayton
    BMC Palliative Care, 14
  • [5] Acceptability of an advance care planning interview schedule: a focus group study
    Barnes, Kelly
    Jones, Louise
    Tookman, Adrian
    King, Michael
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2007, 21 (01) : 23 - 28
  • [6] The BOOST paediatric advance care planning intervention for adolescents with cancer and their parents: development, acceptability and feasibility
    van Driessche, Anne
    Gilissen, Joni
    De Vleminck, Aline
    Kars, Marijke
    Fahner, Jurrianne
    ten Bosch, Jutte van der Werff
    Deliens, Luc
    Cohen, Joachim
    Beernaert, Kim
    BMC PEDIATRICS, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [7] Feasibility and Acceptability of a Brief Motivational Stage-Tailored Intervention to Advance Care Planning: A Pilot Study
    Ko, Eunjeong
    Hohman, Melinda
    Lee, Jaehoon
    Ngo, Ai-Nhat
    Woodruff, Susan I.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 33 (09) : 834 - 842
  • [8] A novel combined resilience and advance care planning intervention for adolescents and young adults with advanced cancer: A feasibility and acceptability cohort study
    Fladeboe, Kaitlyn M.
    O'Donnell, Maeve B.
    Barton, Krysta S.
    Bradford, Miranda C.
    Steineck, Angela
    Junkins, Courtney C.
    Yi-Frazier, Joyce P.
    Rosenberg, Abby R.
    CANCER, 2021, 127 (23) : 4504 - 4511
  • [9] Feasibility and acceptability of facilitated advance care planning in outpatient clinics: A qualitative study of health-care professionals experience
    Marshall, Kate H.
    Riddiford-Harland, Diane L.
    Meller, Anne E.
    Kruger, Vanessa
    Kirsebom, Marie
    Tran, Michael
    Caplan, Gideon A.
    Naganathan, Vasi
    Cullen, John
    Gonski, Peter
    Zwar, Nicholas
    O'Keeffe, Julie-Ann
    Krysinska, Karolina
    Rhee, Joel J.
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING, 2024, 43 (02) : 314 - 322
  • [10] Advance care planning for cancer patients in primary care: a feasibility study
    Boyd, Kirsty
    Mason, Bruce
    Kendall, Marilyn
    Barclay, Stephen
    Chinn, David
    Thomas, Keri
    Sheikh, Aziz
    Murray, Scott A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2010, 60 (581) : e449 - e458