A Critical Assessment of Industrial Coal Drying Technologies: Role of Energy, Emissions, Risk and Sustainability

被引:125
作者
Jangam, S. V.
Karthikeyan, M. [2 ]
Mujumdar, A. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Mech Engn & Minerals, Met & Mat Technol Ctr M3TC, Blk EA, Singapore 117576, Singapore
[2] Surbana Int Consultants Pte Ltd, Jalan Bukit Merah, Singapore
关键词
Energy efficiency; Greenhouse gases; Innovation; LCA; Low-rank coal; Risk assessment; Selection of dryers; Sustainable; FLUIDIZED-BED; PART; PERFORMANCE; LIGNITE; DRYER; SIMULATION; OPERATION;
D O I
10.1080/07373937.2010.498070
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Low-rank coals (LRCs) constitute about 45% of the total coal reserves and hence will soon be the fossil fuel of choice in many countries despite their high moisture content on mining, which varies from 30% to as high as 66%. It is important to reduce their water content to enhance the heating value and reduce transportation costs while enhancing combustion efficiency, safety, and reduction of emissions on combustion. The level of moisture to be achieved upon drying LRCs depends on the end application; it varies from as low as 0% for hydrogenation processes to 15% for briquetting and gasification processes. Numerous drying technologies have been proposed for drying coal; they include pulse combustion, vacuum, fluid bed, rotary, flash, microwave, and superheated steam drying. Each technology has some pros and cons, which are not always clearly spelled out in the literature. In addition, it is necessary to develop sustainable rather than just cost-effective drying systems for LRC. In this article we assess various coal drying techniques critically and identify their strengths and weaknesses. Some theoretical comparisons of different dryer types are carried out based on energy utilization and carbon footprints. The jury is still out on optimal drying technology for LRC and innovative design concepts should be evaluated before finalizing the selection.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 407
页数:13
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2004, Advances in the Science of Victorian Brown Coal
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2018, SAFETY DESIGN
  • [3] Energy efficient dryer operation - an update on developments
    Baker, CGJ
    [J]. DRYING TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 23 (9-11) : 2071 - 2087
  • [4] Status of worldwide coal mine methane emissions and use
    Bibler, CJ
    Marshall, JS
    Pilcher, RC
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 1998, 35 (1-4) : 283 - 310
  • [5] Pressurised steam drying of Australian low-rank coals - Part 1. Equilibrium moisture contents
    Bongers, GD
    Jackson, WR
    Woskoboenko, F
    [J]. FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 57 (01) : 41 - 54
  • [6] CAROTHERS FP, MITIGATION METHANE E
  • [7] Steam drying of coal. Part 2. Modeling the operation of a fluidized bed drying unit
    Chen, Z
    Agarwal, PK
    Agnew, JB
    [J]. FUEL, 2001, 80 (02) : 209 - 223
  • [8] Steam-drying of coal. Part 1. Modeling the behavior of a single particle
    Chen, Z
    Wu, W
    Agarwal, PK
    [J]. FUEL, 2000, 79 (08) : 961 - 973
  • [9] Performance and Energy Consumption of an Impinging Stream Dryer for High-Moisture Particulate Materials
    Choicharoen, Kwanchai
    Devahastin, Sakamon
    Soponronnarit, Somchart
    [J]. DRYING TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 28 (01) : 20 - 29
  • [10] Clayton S., 2007, P 5 ASIA PACIFIC DRY, P179