A Cloud Based Optimization Method for Zero-Day Threats Detection Using Genetic Algorithm and Ensemble Learning

被引:11
作者
Nkongolo, Mike [1 ]
Van Deventer, Jacobus Philippus [1 ]
Kasongo, Sydney Mambwe [2 ]
Zahra, Syeda Rabab [3 ]
Kipongo, Joseph [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pretoria, Fac Engn Built Environm & Informat Technol, Dept Informat, ZA-0028 Pretoria, South Africa
[2] Stellenbosch Univ, Sch Data Sci & Computat Thinking, Dept Ind Engn, ZA-7600 Stellenbosch, South Africa
[3] Natl Coll Ireland, Sch Comp, Dublin D01 K6W2, Ireland
[4] Univ Johannesburg, Fac Engn & Built Environm, Dept Elect & Elect Engn Sci, 5 Kingsway Ave, ZA-2092 Johannesburg, South Africa
关键词
UGRansome1819; zero-day attacks; cloud computing; machine learning; INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM; ANOMALY DETECTION;
D O I
10.3390/electronics11111749
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This article presents a cloud-based method to classify 0-day attacks from a novel dataset called UGRansome1819. The primary objective of the research is to classify potential unknown threats using Machine Learning (ML) algorithms and cloud services. Our study contribution uses a novel anomaly detection dataset that carries 0-day attacks to train and test ML algorithms using Amazon Web Services such as S3 bucket and SageMaker. The proposed method used Ensemble Learning with a Genetic Algorithm (GA) optimizer having three ML algorithms such as Naive Bayes (NB), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM). These algorithms analyze the dataset by combining each classifier and assessing the classification accuracy of 0-day threats. We have implemented several metrics such as Accuracy, F1-Score, Confusion Matrix, Recall, and Precision to evaluate the performance of the selected algorithms. We have then compared the UGRansome1819 performance complexity with existing datasets using the same optimization settings. The RF implementation (before and after optimization) remains constant on the UGRansome1819 that outperformed the CAIDA and UNSWNB-15 datasets. The optimization technique only improved in Accuracy on the UNSWNB-15 and CAIDA datasets but sufficient performance was achieved in terms of F1-Score with UGRansome1819 using a multi-class classification scheme. The experimental results demonstrate a UGRansome1819 classification ratio of 1% before and after optimization. When compared to the UNSWNB-15 and CAIDA datasets, UGRansome1819 attains the highest accuracy value of 99.6% (prior optimization). The Genetic Algorithm was used as a feature selector and dropped five attributes of the UGRansome1819 causing a decrease in the computational time and over-fitting. The straightforward way to improve the model performance to increase its accuracy after optimization is to add more data samples to the training data. Doing so will add more details to the data and fine-tune the model will result in a more accurate and optimized performance. The experiments demonstrate the instability of single classifiers such as SVM and NB and suggest the proposed optimized validation technique which can aggregate weak classifiers (e.g., SVM and NB) into an ensemble of the genetic optimizer to enhance the classification performance. The UGRansome1819 model's specificity and sensitivity were estimated to be 100% with three predictors of threatening classes (Signature, Synthetic Signature, and Anomaly). Lastly, the test classification accuracy of the SVM model improved by 6% after optimization.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Software-defined networking security for private data center networks and clouds: Vulnerabilities, attacks, countermeasures, and solutions [J].
Abdelrahman, Abdallah Mustafa ;
Rodrigues, Joel J. P. C. ;
Mahmoud, Mukhtar M. E. ;
Saleem, Kashif ;
Das, Ashok Kumar ;
Korotaev, Valery ;
Kozlov, Sergei A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2021, 34 (04)
[2]   Attack-Aware IoT Network Traffic Routing Leveraging Ensemble Learning [J].
Abu Al-Haija, Qasem ;
Al-Badawi, Ahmad .
SENSORS, 2022, 22 (01)
[3]   Evaluation of Machine Learning Techniques for Security in SDN [J].
Ahmad, Ahnaf ;
Harjula, Erkki ;
Ylianttila, Mika ;
Ahmad, Ijaz .
2020 IEEE GLOBECOM WORKSHOPS (GC WKSHPS), 2020,
[4]  
Ahmad T., 2022, ARXIV
[5]   Network intrusion detection system: A systematic study of machine learning and deep learning approaches [J].
Ahmad, Zeeshan ;
Shahid Khan, Adnan ;
Wai Shiang, Cheah ;
Abdullah, Johari ;
Ahmad, Farhan .
TRANSACTIONS ON EMERGING TELECOMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES, 2021, 32 (01)
[6]  
Alazab A., 2012, 2012 International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies (ISCIT), P296, DOI 10.1109/ISCIT.2012.6380910
[7]   A Modified Grey Wolf Optimization Algorithm for an Intrusion Detection System [J].
Alzaqebah, Abdullah ;
Aljarah, Ibrahim ;
Al-Kadi, Omar ;
Damasevicius, Robertas .
MATHEMATICS, 2022, 10 (06)
[8]  
Ashoor AS., 2011, Int J Sci Eng Res, V2, P1
[9]  
Bevish jinila Y., 2022, Data Engineering for Smart Systems: Proceedings of SSIC 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (238), P605, DOI 10.1007/978-981-16-2641-8_57
[10]   On Generating Network Traffic Datasets with Synthetic Attacks for Intrusion Detection [J].
Cordero, Carlos Garcia ;
Vasilomanolakis, Emmanouil ;
Wainakh, Aidmar ;
Muhlhauser, Max ;
Nadjm-Tehrani, Simin .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON PRIVACY AND SECURITY, 2021, 24 (02)