Bibliometric trends in ophthalmology 1997-2009

被引:22
作者
Mansour, Ahmad M. [1 ]
El Mollayess, Georges [1 ]
Habib, Robert [2 ]
Arabi, Asma [3 ]
Medawar, Walid A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Beirut, Dept Ophthalmol, Beirut, Lebanon
[2] Amer Univ Beirut, Div Outcomes Res, Beirut, Lebanon
[3] Amer Univ Beirut, Dept Internal Med, Beirut, Lebanon
关键词
Bibliometrics; biomedical research; journal impact factor; ophthalmic research; surgical research; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTORS; CITATION ANALYSIS; GOOGLE-SCHOLAR; VISION SCIENCE; PUBLICATIONS; EVOLUTION; ARTICLES; METRICS; SCOPUS; WEB;
D O I
10.4103/0301-4738.151471
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Aims: To track citation patterns in ophthalmic journals and contrast them with major medical and surgical journals from 1997 to 2009. In addition, we want to familiarize the ophthalmic community with bibliometrics indices. Materials and Methods: Data retrieved from Institute for Scientific Information and related websites include 2-year journal impact factor JIF, 5-year impact, Eigenfactor score, H-factor, Article Influence score, and SCImago factor. Results: JIF rose steadily around 10% annually in ophthalmic journals, and likewise for major medical and surgical journals. JIF correlated with recent bibliometric indicators like 5-year impact, H index, and SCImago factor but not with Eigenfactor. Ophthalmic journals publishing reviews, basic science, or large volume on broad range of topics ranked at the top for JIF, while subspecialty journals tended to have low JIF. JIF of subspecialty journal Retina rose from 0.740 (rank 23) in 2000 to 3.088 in 2007 (rank 6). Conclusions: JIF tends to rise annually by 10% in medical, surgical, and ophthalmic fields. Journals publishing reviews, basic science, or large volume on broad range of topics rank at the top for JIF. The rapid rise of JIF for Retina unlike other subspecialties that stayed status quo is multifactorial: Change in editorial policies (introduction of review articles and omission of case reports) and technological advances in the retinal field.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 58
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Andersen Julia, 2006, Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection, V39, P436
  • [2] The Eigenfactor™ Metrics
    Bergstrom, Carl T.
    West, Jevin D.
    Wiseman, Marc A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 28 (45) : 11433 - 11434
  • [3] Publication and citation analysis of the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology and Clinical 0mp; Experimental Ophthalmology over a 10-year period: the evolution of an ophthalmology journal
    Chou, Chi-Ying
    Chew, Shenton S. L.
    Patel, Dipika V.
    Ormonde, Susan E.
    McGhee, Charles N. J.
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 37 (09) : 868 - 873
  • [4] Refining dermatology journal impact factors using PageRank
    Dellavalle, Robert P.
    Schilling, Lisa M.
    Rodriguez, Marko A.
    Van de Sompel, Herbert
    Bollen, Johan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2007, 57 (01) : 116 - 119
  • [5] Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact
    Eysenbach, Gunther
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2011, 13 (04) : e123
  • [6] Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses
    Falagas, Matthew E.
    Pitsouni, Eleni I.
    Malietzis, George A.
    Pappas, Georgios
    [J]. FASEB JOURNAL, 2008, 22 (02) : 338 - 342
  • [7] The history and meaning of the journal impact factor
    Garfield, E
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (01): : 90 - 93
  • [8] Worldwide geographical distribution of ophthalmology publications
    Guerin M.B.
    Flynn T.H.
    Brady J.
    O'Brien C.J.
    [J]. International Ophthalmology, 2009, 29 (6) : 511 - 516
  • [9] Does the h index have predictive power?
    Hirsch, J. E.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2007, 104 (49) : 19193 - 19198
  • [10] Katibeh Marzieh, 2011, J Ophthalmic Vis Res, V6, P225