Measurement invariance of the Cultural Intelligence Scale across three countries

被引:5
作者
Brancu, Laura [1 ]
Sahin, Faruk [2 ]
Gudmundsdottir, Svala [3 ]
Cetin, Fatih [4 ]
机构
[1] West Univ Timisoara, Dept Management, Timisoara 300223, Romania
[2] Mugla Sitki Kocman Univ, Fethiye Fac Business Adm, TR-48300 Mugla, Fethiye, Turkey
[3] Univ Iceland, Fac Business Adm, IS-102 Reykjavik, Iceland
[4] Nigde Omer Halisdemir Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, TR-51240 Nigde, Turkey
关键词
Cultural intelligence; Measurement invariance; Cross-cultural study; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS; OF-FIT INDEXES; 4-FACTOR MODEL; METACOGNITION; COMPETENCE; PSYCHOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.12.002
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The present study assessed the factor structure and measurement invariance of the Cultural In-telligence Scale (CQS) in university students from Romania, Turkey, and Iceland. A total of 730 undergraduates completed the 20 item-CQS. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated that the four-factor model, which consisted of metacognitive, cognitive, motivational, and behavioral di-mensions, fit the data better than alternative models (three-factor and single-factor models). Discriminant and convergent validity of the CQS was also confirmed. Furthermore, the invariance of test for the CQS showed that the four-factor model of the CQS is suitable across three countries and the pattern of factor loading is invariant across these countries. However, the results did not support scalar invariance for three countries, which showed that partial measurement invariance was only established. In conclusion, the students in three countries reacted to the items for evaluating CQ in different ways, according to the findings of this study.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 157
页数:13
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   Fractionalization [J].
Alesina, A ;
Devleeschauwer, A ;
Easterly, W ;
Kurlat, S ;
Wacziarg, R .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2003, 8 (02) :155-194
[2]   Cultural intelligence, perceived inclusion, and cultural diversity in workgroups [J].
Alexandra, Valerie ;
Ehrhart, Karen Holcombe ;
Randel, Amy E. .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2021, 168
[3]  
Ang S., 2008, Handbook on cultural intelligence: Theory, measurement, and applications, P3
[4]  
Ang S., 2015, Handbook of Advances in Culture and Psychology, V5, P273
[5]  
Ang S., 2019, The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence, P820, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781108770422.035
[6]  
Ang S., 2007, Management and Organization Review, V3, P335, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1740-8784.2007.00082.X, 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2007.00082.x]
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2003, LISREL 8 54
[8]  
Bagozzi R.B., 1988, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V16, P74, DOI [10.1007/BF02723327, DOI 10.1177/009207038801600107, DOI 10.1007/BF02723327, 10.1177/009207038801600107]
[9]   PRACTICAL ISSUES IN STRUCTURAL MODELING [J].
BENTLER, PM ;
CHOU, CP .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1987, 16 (01) :78-117
[10]  
Brancu L., 2016, Review of International Comparative Management, V17, P308