Complex kinship analysis with a combination of STRs, SNPs, and indels

被引:17
作者
Zhang, Qingzhen [1 ]
Wang, Xueqian [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Peng [1 ]
Yang, Sen [1 ]
Li, Weiguo [2 ]
Zhou, Zhe [1 ]
Wang, Shengqi [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Radiat Med, 27 Taiping Rd, Beijing 100850, Peoples R China
[2] Henan Normal Univ, Coll Life Sci, 46 East Jianshe Rd, Xinxiang 453007, Henan, Peoples R China
关键词
Complex kinship; Short tandem repeats; Single-nucleotide polymorphisms; Insertions-deletions; Likelihood ratio; IDENTIFICATION; ASSAY; REMAINS; MARKERS; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.fsigen.2022.102749
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Complex kinship analysis has been widely applied in disaster victim identification and criminal investigations. A larger number of genetic markers is required to improve the discrimination power of the system in complex kinship analysis compared to that in paternity testing, as distant relatives share fewer genetic segments. Genetic markers, including short tandem repeats (STRs), single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and insertions-deletions (indels), play complementary roles in kinship analysis. Few studies have systematically analyzed the system discrimination power of a new combination of different types of genetic markers before using these markers in practice. Here, we tested the ability of a set of 56 STRs available in commercial panels on complex kinship analysis. We next introduced a combination marker set of STRs, indels, and SNPs and evaluated the system discrimination power of 72 indels + 52 SNPs to improve the weight of 56 STRs. Statistical analysis of complex kinship within third-degree kinship testing was performed to compare 56 STRs or 72 indels + 52 SNPs alone. True samples were assessed, including 99 full siblings, 112 uncle/aunt-nephew/niece, 43 grandfather/ grandmother-grandson/granddaughter, 63 first cousins, and 5931 unrelated pairs. Simulation was also performed using 10,000 pairs of relatives and 10,000 unrelated individuals. The effectiveness of the three marker sets in kinship testing was ranked as follows: 56 STRs + 72 indels + 52 SNPs > 56 STRs > 72 indels + 52 SNPs. All three marker sets were powerful in first-degree kinship testing; 56 STRs and 56 STRs + 72 indels + 52 SNPs could distinguish most second-degree relatives from unrelated pairs. However, only a portion of third-degree relatives was correctly determined from unrelated individuals using 56 STRs + 72 indels + 52 SNPs. In relationship testing, 56 STRs and 56 STRs + 72 indels + 52 SNPs were powerful enough to distinguish first-degree relatives from second-degree or third-degree relatives. Our results provide a strategy and guidance applicable in forensic practice for complex kinship analysis by combining STRs, SNPs, and indels.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Capture of assay template by multiplex PCR of long amplicons for genotyping SNPs and InDels with MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry
    Sexton, Timothy R.
    Henry, Robert J.
    McManus, Luke J.
    Bowen, Stirling
    Shepherd, Mervyn
    MOLECULAR BREEDING, 2010, 25 (03) : 471 - 480
  • [42] The evidential value of STRs -: An analysis of exclusion cases
    Brinkmann, B
    Pfeiffer, H
    Schürenkamp, M
    Hohoff, C
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEGAL MEDICINE, 2001, 114 (03) : 173 - 177
  • [43] An 18 Multi-InDels panel for analysis of highly degraded forensic biological samples
    Li, Jienan
    Lin, Lin
    Jiang, Bowei
    Wang, Chudong
    Zeye, Moutanou Modeste Judes
    Wen, Dan
    He, Wei
    Qu, Weifeng
    Liu, Ying
    Zha, Lagabaiyila
    ELECTROPHORESIS, 2021, 42 (9-10) : 1143 - 1152
  • [44] Kinship Determination in Archeological Contexts Through DNA Analysis
    Vai, Stefania
    Amorim, Carlos Eduardo G.
    Lari, Martina
    Caramelli, David
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2020, 8
  • [45] Likelihood ratios in kinship analysis: Contrasting kinship classes, not genealogies
    Pinto, Nadia
    Gusmao, Leonor
    Amorim, Antonio
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-GENETICS, 2010, 4 (03) : 218 - 219
  • [46] An X-STRs analysis of the Iraqi Sorani Kurds
    M. Albarzinji, Balnd
    Hadi, Shams
    Ismael, Bahez
    Barqee, Ahmed
    Hadi, Abdullah
    Lazim, Hayder
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (11):
  • [47] An empirical comparison of SNPs and microsatellites for parentage and kinship assignment in a wild sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) population
    Hauser, Lorenz
    Baird, Melissa
    Hilborn, Ray
    Seeb, Lisa W.
    Seeb, James E.
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2011, 11 : 150 - 161
  • [48] Functional analysis of HapMap SNPs
    Liu, Ching-Ti
    Lin, Houwei
    Lin, Honghuang
    GENE, 2012, 511 (02) : 358 - 363
  • [49] Meta-Analysis of SNPs Determining Litter Traits in Pigs
    Sell-Kubiak, Ewa
    Dobrzanski, Jan
    Derks, Martijn F. L.
    Lopes, Marcos S.
    Szwaczkowski, Tomasz
    GENES, 2022, 13 (10)
  • [50] 4040 SNPs for genomic analysis in the rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta)
    Trask, J. Satkoski
    Garnica, W. T.
    Kanthaswamy, S.
    Malhi, R. S.
    Smith, D. G.
    GENOMICS, 2011, 98 (05) : 352 - 358