Complex kinship analysis with a combination of STRs, SNPs, and indels

被引:17
作者
Zhang, Qingzhen [1 ]
Wang, Xueqian [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Peng [1 ]
Yang, Sen [1 ]
Li, Weiguo [2 ]
Zhou, Zhe [1 ]
Wang, Shengqi [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Radiat Med, 27 Taiping Rd, Beijing 100850, Peoples R China
[2] Henan Normal Univ, Coll Life Sci, 46 East Jianshe Rd, Xinxiang 453007, Henan, Peoples R China
关键词
Complex kinship; Short tandem repeats; Single-nucleotide polymorphisms; Insertions-deletions; Likelihood ratio; IDENTIFICATION; ASSAY; REMAINS; MARKERS; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.fsigen.2022.102749
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Complex kinship analysis has been widely applied in disaster victim identification and criminal investigations. A larger number of genetic markers is required to improve the discrimination power of the system in complex kinship analysis compared to that in paternity testing, as distant relatives share fewer genetic segments. Genetic markers, including short tandem repeats (STRs), single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and insertions-deletions (indels), play complementary roles in kinship analysis. Few studies have systematically analyzed the system discrimination power of a new combination of different types of genetic markers before using these markers in practice. Here, we tested the ability of a set of 56 STRs available in commercial panels on complex kinship analysis. We next introduced a combination marker set of STRs, indels, and SNPs and evaluated the system discrimination power of 72 indels + 52 SNPs to improve the weight of 56 STRs. Statistical analysis of complex kinship within third-degree kinship testing was performed to compare 56 STRs or 72 indels + 52 SNPs alone. True samples were assessed, including 99 full siblings, 112 uncle/aunt-nephew/niece, 43 grandfather/ grandmother-grandson/granddaughter, 63 first cousins, and 5931 unrelated pairs. Simulation was also performed using 10,000 pairs of relatives and 10,000 unrelated individuals. The effectiveness of the three marker sets in kinship testing was ranked as follows: 56 STRs + 72 indels + 52 SNPs > 56 STRs > 72 indels + 52 SNPs. All three marker sets were powerful in first-degree kinship testing; 56 STRs and 56 STRs + 72 indels + 52 SNPs could distinguish most second-degree relatives from unrelated pairs. However, only a portion of third-degree relatives was correctly determined from unrelated individuals using 56 STRs + 72 indels + 52 SNPs. In relationship testing, 56 STRs and 56 STRs + 72 indels + 52 SNPs were powerful enough to distinguish first-degree relatives from second-degree or third-degree relatives. Our results provide a strategy and guidance applicable in forensic practice for complex kinship analysis by combining STRs, SNPs, and indels.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Genetic portrait of Jewish populations based on three sets of X-chromosome markers: Indels, Alu insertions and STRs
    Ferragut, J. F.
    Bentayebi, K.
    Pereira, R.
    Castro, J. A.
    Amorim, A.
    Ramon, C.
    Picornell, A.
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-GENETICS, 2017, 31 : E5 - E11
  • [32] Functional annotation of mulberry (Morus spp.) transcriptome, differential expression of genes related to growth and identification of putative genic SSRs, SNPs and InDels
    Rukmangada, M. S.
    Sumathy, R.
    Naik, Vorkady Girish
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTS, 2019, 46 (06) : 6421 - 6434
  • [33] Deep resequencing unveils novel SNPs, InDels, and large structural variants for the clonal fingerprinting of sweet orange [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck]
    Scaglione, Davide
    Ciacciulli, Angelo
    Gattolin, Stefano
    Caruso, Marco
    Marroni, Fabio
    Casas, Giuseppina Las
    Jurman, Irena
    Licciardello, Grazia
    Catara, Antonino Felice
    Rossini, Laura
    Licciardello, Concetta
    Morgante, Michele
    PLANT GENOME, 2025, 18 (01)
  • [34] Forensic application of a novel MPS-based panel (90 STRs and 100 SNPs) in a non-exclusion parentage case with three autosomal STRs incompatibilities
    Wu, Jia-zi
    Wang, Ling-xiang
    Yang, Xing-yi
    Pan, Dong-hua
    Lu, Xiao-yu
    Liu, Chang-hui
    Han, Xiao-long
    Liu, Hong
    Shi, Mei-sen
    Liu, Chao
    Wen, Shao-qing
    LEGAL MEDICINE, 2022, 54
  • [35] Massively parallel sequencing of autosomal STRs and identity-informative SNPs highlights consanguinity in Saudi Arabia
    Khubrani, Yahya M.
    Hallast, Pille
    Jobling, Mark A.
    Wetton, Jon H.
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-GENETICS, 2019, 43
  • [36] Linkage and linkage disequilibrium analysis of X-STRs in Italian families
    Inturri, Serena
    Menegon, Silvia
    Amoroso, Antonio
    Torre, Carlo
    Robino, Carlo
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-GENETICS, 2011, 5 (02) : 152 - 154
  • [37] Handling founder inbreeding in forensic kinship analysis
    Vigeland, Magnus D.
    Egeland, Thore
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL GENETICS SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 2019, 7 (01) : 780 - 781
  • [38] Forensic efficiency evaluation of a novel multiplex panel of InDels and STRs in the Guizhou Han population and its phylogenetic relationships with other reference populations
    Zheng, Yanhua
    Wang, Ting
    He, Kun
    Yang, Yunteng
    You, Jiangtao
    Huang, Xiaolan
    Zhang, Hongling
    Ren, Zheng
    Wang, Qiyan
    Huang, Jiang
    Jin, Xiaoye
    ANNALS OF HUMAN BIOLOGY, 2023, 50 (01) : 42 - 47
  • [39] Potential of 13 linked autosomal short tandem repeat loci in pairwise kinship analysis
    Liu, Qiu-Ling
    Xue, Li
    Wu, Wei-Wei
    He, Xin
    Liu, Kai-Yan
    Zhao, Hu
    Lu, De-Jian
    ELECTROPHORESIS, 2016, 37 (21) : 2800 - 2806
  • [40] Forensic nanopore sequencing of STRs and SNPs using Verogen's ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit and MinION
    Ren, Zi-Lin
    Zhang, Jia-Rong
    Zhang, Xiao-Meng
    Liu, Xu
    Lin, Yan-Feng
    Bai, Hua
    Wang, Meng-Chun
    Cheng, Feng
    Liu, Jin-Ding
    Li, Peng
    Kong, Lei
    Bo, Xiao-Chen
    Wang, Sheng-Qi
    Ni, Ming
    Yan, Jiang-Wei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEGAL MEDICINE, 2021, 135 (05) : 1685 - 1693