Complex kinship analysis with a combination of STRs, SNPs, and indels

被引:17
作者
Zhang, Qingzhen [1 ]
Wang, Xueqian [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Peng [1 ]
Yang, Sen [1 ]
Li, Weiguo [2 ]
Zhou, Zhe [1 ]
Wang, Shengqi [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Radiat Med, 27 Taiping Rd, Beijing 100850, Peoples R China
[2] Henan Normal Univ, Coll Life Sci, 46 East Jianshe Rd, Xinxiang 453007, Henan, Peoples R China
关键词
Complex kinship; Short tandem repeats; Single-nucleotide polymorphisms; Insertions-deletions; Likelihood ratio; IDENTIFICATION; ASSAY; REMAINS; MARKERS; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.fsigen.2022.102749
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Complex kinship analysis has been widely applied in disaster victim identification and criminal investigations. A larger number of genetic markers is required to improve the discrimination power of the system in complex kinship analysis compared to that in paternity testing, as distant relatives share fewer genetic segments. Genetic markers, including short tandem repeats (STRs), single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and insertions-deletions (indels), play complementary roles in kinship analysis. Few studies have systematically analyzed the system discrimination power of a new combination of different types of genetic markers before using these markers in practice. Here, we tested the ability of a set of 56 STRs available in commercial panels on complex kinship analysis. We next introduced a combination marker set of STRs, indels, and SNPs and evaluated the system discrimination power of 72 indels + 52 SNPs to improve the weight of 56 STRs. Statistical analysis of complex kinship within third-degree kinship testing was performed to compare 56 STRs or 72 indels + 52 SNPs alone. True samples were assessed, including 99 full siblings, 112 uncle/aunt-nephew/niece, 43 grandfather/ grandmother-grandson/granddaughter, 63 first cousins, and 5931 unrelated pairs. Simulation was also performed using 10,000 pairs of relatives and 10,000 unrelated individuals. The effectiveness of the three marker sets in kinship testing was ranked as follows: 56 STRs + 72 indels + 52 SNPs > 56 STRs > 72 indels + 52 SNPs. All three marker sets were powerful in first-degree kinship testing; 56 STRs and 56 STRs + 72 indels + 52 SNPs could distinguish most second-degree relatives from unrelated pairs. However, only a portion of third-degree relatives was correctly determined from unrelated individuals using 56 STRs + 72 indels + 52 SNPs. In relationship testing, 56 STRs and 56 STRs + 72 indels + 52 SNPs were powerful enough to distinguish first-degree relatives from second-degree or third-degree relatives. Our results provide a strategy and guidance applicable in forensic practice for complex kinship analysis by combining STRs, SNPs, and indels.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Forensic and genetic landscape explorations of Chinese Kyrgyz group based on autosomal SNPs, Y-chromosomal SNPs and STRs
    Fang, Yating
    Mei, Shuyan
    Zhang, Yunying
    Teng, Rui
    Tai, Yunchun
    Zhu, Bofeng
    GENE, 2022, 832
  • [22] How many single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are needed to replace short tandem repeats (STRs) in forensic applications?
    Lee, Hyo-Jung
    Lee, Jae Won
    Jeong, Su Jin
    Park, Mira
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEGAL MEDICINE, 2017, 131 (05) : 1203 - 1210
  • [23] Kinship Analysis with Diallelic SNPs - Experiences with the SNPforID Multiplex in an ISO17025 Accreditated Laboratory
    Borsting, Claus
    Mikkelsen, Martin
    Morling, Niels
    TRANSFUSION MEDICINE AND HEMOTHERAPY, 2012, 39 (03) : 195 - 201
  • [24] How many single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are needed to replace short tandem repeats (STRs) in forensic applications?
    Hyo-Jung Lee
    Jae Won Lee
    Su Jin Jeong
    Mira Park
    International Journal of Legal Medicine, 2017, 131 : 1203 - 1210
  • [25] Pairwise kinship testing with a combination of STR and SNP loci
    Zhang, Qingzhen
    Zhou, Zhe
    Wang, Lei
    Quan, Cheng
    Liu, Qiqi
    Tang, Zhaobing
    Liu, Liyan
    Liu, Yacheng
    Wang, Shengqi
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-GENETICS, 2020, 46
  • [26] Identification of SNPs and InDels associated with berry size in table grapes integrating genetic and transcriptomic approaches
    Munoz-Espinoza, Claudia
    Di Genova, Alex
    Sanchez, Alicia
    Correa, Jose
    Espinoza, Alonso
    Meneses, Claudio
    Maass, Alejandro
    Orellana, Ariel
    Hinrichsen, Patricio
    BMC PLANT BIOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [27] Improving complex kinship analyses with additional STR loci
    Carboni, Ilaria
    Iozzi, Sara
    Nutini, Anna Lucia
    Torricelli, Francesca
    Ricci, Ugo
    ELECTROPHORESIS, 2014, 35 (21-22) : 3145 - 3151
  • [28] PyroHMMvar: a sensitive and accurate method to call short indels and SNPs for Ion Torrent and 454 data
    Zeng, Feng
    Jiang, Rui
    Chen, Ting
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2013, 29 (22) : 2859 - 2868
  • [29] Development and application of InDels and SNPs markers based on whole-genome resequencing in Chinese cabbage
    Liu, Kai-Wen
    Men, Wan-Jie
    Feng, Jin-Xia
    Hussain, Iqbal
    Sheng, Hui
    Zhang, Li-Wei
    Dai, Zhong-Ren
    Hu, Hai-Jiang
    Yang, Jian-Hao
    Lei, Na
    Yu, Xiao-Lin
    HORTICULTURE ENVIRONMENT AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2025,
  • [30] Prediction of Functional Regulatory SNPs in Monogenic and Complex Disease
    Zhao, Yiqiang
    Clark, Wyatt T.
    Mort, Matthew
    Cooper, David N.
    Radivojac, Predrag
    Mooney, Sean D.
    HUMAN MUTATION, 2011, 32 (10) : 1183 - 1190