Complex kinship analysis with a combination of STRs, SNPs, and indels

被引:17
作者
Zhang, Qingzhen [1 ]
Wang, Xueqian [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Peng [1 ]
Yang, Sen [1 ]
Li, Weiguo [2 ]
Zhou, Zhe [1 ]
Wang, Shengqi [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Radiat Med, 27 Taiping Rd, Beijing 100850, Peoples R China
[2] Henan Normal Univ, Coll Life Sci, 46 East Jianshe Rd, Xinxiang 453007, Henan, Peoples R China
关键词
Complex kinship; Short tandem repeats; Single-nucleotide polymorphisms; Insertions-deletions; Likelihood ratio; IDENTIFICATION; ASSAY; REMAINS; MARKERS; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.fsigen.2022.102749
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Complex kinship analysis has been widely applied in disaster victim identification and criminal investigations. A larger number of genetic markers is required to improve the discrimination power of the system in complex kinship analysis compared to that in paternity testing, as distant relatives share fewer genetic segments. Genetic markers, including short tandem repeats (STRs), single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and insertions-deletions (indels), play complementary roles in kinship analysis. Few studies have systematically analyzed the system discrimination power of a new combination of different types of genetic markers before using these markers in practice. Here, we tested the ability of a set of 56 STRs available in commercial panels on complex kinship analysis. We next introduced a combination marker set of STRs, indels, and SNPs and evaluated the system discrimination power of 72 indels + 52 SNPs to improve the weight of 56 STRs. Statistical analysis of complex kinship within third-degree kinship testing was performed to compare 56 STRs or 72 indels + 52 SNPs alone. True samples were assessed, including 99 full siblings, 112 uncle/aunt-nephew/niece, 43 grandfather/ grandmother-grandson/granddaughter, 63 first cousins, and 5931 unrelated pairs. Simulation was also performed using 10,000 pairs of relatives and 10,000 unrelated individuals. The effectiveness of the three marker sets in kinship testing was ranked as follows: 56 STRs + 72 indels + 52 SNPs > 56 STRs > 72 indels + 52 SNPs. All three marker sets were powerful in first-degree kinship testing; 56 STRs and 56 STRs + 72 indels + 52 SNPs could distinguish most second-degree relatives from unrelated pairs. However, only a portion of third-degree relatives was correctly determined from unrelated individuals using 56 STRs + 72 indels + 52 SNPs. In relationship testing, 56 STRs and 56 STRs + 72 indels + 52 SNPs were powerful enough to distinguish first-degree relatives from second-degree or third-degree relatives. Our results provide a strategy and guidance applicable in forensic practice for complex kinship analysis by combining STRs, SNPs, and indels.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative evaluation of alternative batteries of genetic markers to complement autosomal STRs in kinship investigations: autosomal indels vs. X-chromosome STRs
    Gomes, Claudia
    Magalhaes, Marta
    Alves, Cintia
    Amorim, Antonio
    Pinto, Nadia
    Gusmao, Leonor
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEGAL MEDICINE, 2012, 126 (06) : 917 - 921
  • [2] Comparative evaluation of alternative batteries of genetic markers to complement autosomal STRs in kinship investigations: autosomal indels vs. X-chromosome STRs
    Cláudia Gomes
    Marta Magalhães
    Cíntia Alves
    António Amorim
    Nádia Pinto
    Leonor Gusmão
    International Journal of Legal Medicine, 2012, 126 : 917 - 921
  • [3] Exploring nanopore direct sequencing performance of forensic STRs, SNPs, InDels, and DNA methylation markers in a single assay
    de Bruin, Desiree D. S. H.
    Haagmans, Martin A.
    van der Gaag, Kristiaan J.
    Hoogenboom, Jerry
    Weiler, Natalie E. C.
    Tesi, Niccolo
    Salazar, Alex
    Zhang, Yaran
    Holstege, Henne
    Reinders, Marcel
    M'charek, Amade Aouatef
    Sijen, Titia
    Henneman, Peter
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-GENETICS, 2025, 74
  • [4] X-chromosomal STRs in aDNA kinship analysis
    Bretschneider, Anna
    Mazanec, Janine
    Wittmeier, Patrick
    Flux, Anna Lena
    Schmidt, Diane
    Hummel, Susanne
    ANTHROPOLOGISCHER ANZEIGER, 2024, 81 (02) : 131 - 138
  • [5] Kinship Testing Based on SNPs Using Microarray System
    Cho, Sohee
    Seo, Hee Jin
    Lee, Jihyun
    Yu, Hyung Jin
    Lee, Soong Deok
    TRANSFUSION MEDICINE AND HEMOTHERAPY, 2016, 43 (06) : 429 - 432
  • [6] Comparison of next generation sequencing (NGS) - (SNPs) and capillary electrophoresis (CE) - (STRs) in the genetic analysis of human remains
    Kokotas, Stavros
    Budowle, Bruce
    Papatheodorou, Athanasios
    Bolanaki, Eugenia
    Kondili, Aikaterini
    Metheniti, Aristea
    Vouropoulou, Maria
    Koukouvinos, Georgios
    Palaigeorgiou, Emmanouil
    Makras, Polyzois
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-GENETICS, 2025, 74
  • [7] Comparative Values of SSRs, SNPs and InDels for Citrus Genetic Diversity Analysis
    Ollitrault, Patrick
    Garcia-Lor, Andres
    Terol, Javier
    Curk, Franck
    Ollitrault, Frederique
    Talon, Manuel
    Navarro, Luis
    XII INTERNATIONAL CITRUS CONGRESS - INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF CITRICULTURE, 2015, 1065 : 457 - 466
  • [8] STRs, mini STRs and SNPs - A comparative study for typing degraded DNA
    Senge, Tim
    Madea, Burkhard
    Junge, Anke
    Rothschild, Markus A.
    Schneider, Peter M.
    LEGAL MEDICINE, 2011, 13 (02) : 68 - 74
  • [9] Analysis of artificially degraded DNA using STRs and SNPs - results of a collaborative European (EDNAP) exercise
    Dixon, L. A.
    Dobbins, A. E.
    Pulker, H. K.
    Butler, J. M.
    Vallone, P. M.
    Coble, M. D.
    Parson, W.
    Berger, B.
    Grubwieser, P.
    Mogensen, H. S.
    Morling, N.
    Nielsen, K.
    Sanchez, J. J.
    Petkovski, E.
    Carracedo, A.
    Sanchez-Diz, P.
    Ramos-Luis, E.
    Brion, M.
    Irwin, J. A.
    Just, R. S.
    Loreille, O.
    Parsons, T. J.
    Syndercombe-Court, D.
    Schmitter, H.
    Stradmann-Bellinghausen, B.
    Bender, K.
    Gill, P.
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 164 (01) : 33 - 44
  • [10] Complex kinship testing using the MGIEasy Pa-SNPs genotyping kit
    Zhang, Qingzhen
    Dong, Tingting
    Wang, Xueqian
    Zhang, Xiaochang
    Yang, Sen
    Cheng, Peng
    Zhou, Zhe
    Wang, Shengqi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEGAL MEDICINE, 2024, : 1005 - 1017