Analysis of Elevation Changes Detected from Multi-Temporal LiDAR Surveys in Forested Landslide Terrain in Western Oregon

被引:48
作者
Burns, William J. [1 ]
Coe, Jeffrey A. [2 ]
Kaya, Basak Sener [3 ]
Ma, Lina [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Dept Geol & Mineral Ind, Portland, OR 97232 USA
[2] US Geol Survey, Denver Fed Ctr, Denver, CO 80225 USA
[3] Colorado Sch Mines, Div Engn, Golden, CO 80401 USA
关键词
Multi-Temporal; LiDAR; Landslide; Debris Flow; Accuracy; Oregon; Forested; Differential; Volume; Elevation; Leaf On; Leaf Off; Point Density; AIRBORNE LIDAR; NORTH-CAROLINA; DEBRIS FLOW; RESOLUTION; SEATTLE; USA; WASHINGTON; MORPHOLOGY; MODEL; DEMS;
D O I
10.2113/gseegeosci.16.4.315
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We examined elevation changes detected from two successive sets of Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data in the northern Coast Range of Oregon. The first set of LiDAR data was acquired during leaf-on conditions and the second set during leaf-off conditions. We were able to successfully identify and map active landslides using a differential digital elevation model (DEM) created from the two LiDAR data sets, but this required the use of thresholds (0.50 and 0.75 m) to remove noise from the differential elevation data, visual pattern recognition of landslide-induced elevation changes, and supplemental QuickBird satellite imagery. After mapping, we field-verified 88 percent of the landslides that we had mapped with high confidence, but we could not detect active landslides with elevation changes of less than 0.50 m. Volumetric calculations showed that a total of about 18,100 m 3 of material was missing from landslide areas, probably as a result of systematic negative elevation errors in the differential DEM and as a result of removal of material by erosion and transport. We also examined the accuracies of 285 leaf-off LiDAR elevations at four landslide sites using Global Positioning System and total station surveys. A comparison of LiDAR and survey data indicated an overall root mean square error of 0.50 m, a maximum error of 2.21 m, and a systematic error of 0.09 m. LiDAR ground-point densities were lowest in areas with young conifer forests and deciduous vegetation, which resulted in extensive interpolations of elevations in the leaf-on, bare-earth DEM. For optimal use of multi-temporal LiDAR data in forested areas, we recommend that all data sets be flown during leaf-off seasons.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 341
页数:27
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Evaluation of lidar and medium scale photogrammetry for detecting soft-cliff coastal change [J].
Adams, JC ;
Chandler, JH .
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC RECORD, 2002, 17 (99) :405-418
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, US GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
[3]   Identification and mapping of recent rainfall-induced landslides using elevation data collected by airborne Lidar [J].
Ardizzone, F. ;
Cardinali, M. ;
Galli, M. ;
Guzzetti, F. ;
Reichenbach, P. .
NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2007, 7 (06) :637-650
[4]   Airborne laser scanning: basic relations and formulas [J].
Baltsavias, EP .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 1999, 54 (2-3) :199-214
[5]   Regional landslide-hazard assessment for Seattle, Washington, USA [J].
Baum, RL ;
Coe, JA ;
Godt, JW ;
Harp, EL ;
Reid, ME ;
Savage, WZ ;
Schulz, WH ;
Brien, DL ;
Chleborad, AF ;
McKenna, JP ;
Michael, JA .
LANDSLIDES, 2005, 2 (04) :266-279
[6]   Evaluation of light detection and ranging (LIDAR) for measuring river corridor topography [J].
Bowen, ZH ;
Waltermire, RG .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2002, 38 (01) :33-41
[7]  
*BUR LAND MAN, 2005, FOR COV OP INV PUBL
[8]  
*BUR LAND MAN, 1997, NO COAST RANG AD MAN
[9]  
Burns W.J., 2009, PROTOCOL INVENTORY M
[10]  
BURNS WJ, 2007, ASS ENV ENG GEOLOGIS, V23, P335