Information and knowledge about Down syndrome among women and partners after first trimester combined testing

被引:19
作者
Ternby, Ellen [1 ]
Ingvoldstad, Charlotta [1 ,2 ]
Anneren, Goran [3 ]
Lindgren, Peter [1 ]
Axelsson, Ove [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Uppsala Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Caring Sci, Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Uppsala Univ, Dept Immunol Genet & Pathol, Uppsala, Sweden
[4] Uppsala Univ, Ctr Clin Res Sormland, Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
Prenatal screening; Down syndrome; combined ultrasound and biochemistry test; informed decision; antenatal care and diagnosis; education; INFORMED-CONSENT; PREGNANT-WOMEN;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.12560
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
We assessed reasons among women and partners for choosing combined ultrasound-biochemistry testing, information and knowledge about Down syndrome and decisions concerning invasive procedures and termination of pregnancy in a prospective cohort study in Uppsala County. In all 105 pregnant women and 104 partners coming for a combined ultrasound-biochemistry test answered a questionnaire. The most common reason for a combined ultrasound-biochemistry test was to perform all tests possible to make sure the baby is healthy. Internet and midwives were the most common sources of information. Seventy-two percent had not received information on what it means to live with a child with Down syndrome. Many expectant parents perceived information as insufficient. Both women and partners had varying or low levels of knowledge about medical, cognitive and social consequences of Down syndrome. Twenty-five percent had not decided on an invasive test if indicated and only 42% would consider termination of pregnancy with a Down syndrome diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 332
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Do pregnant women and their partners make an informed choice about first trimester risk assessment for Down syndrome, and are they satisfied with the choice?
    Bangsgaard, Louise
    Tabor, Ann
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2013, 33 (02) : 146 - 152
  • [2] Chilaka VN, 2001, PRENATAL DIAG, V21, P159, DOI 10.1002/1097-0223(200103)21:3<159::AID-PD20>3.0.CO
  • [3] 2-V
  • [4] Informed consent: providing information about prenatal examinations
    Dahl, Katja
    Kesmodel, Ulrik
    Hvidman, Lone
    Olesen, Frede
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2006, 85 (12) : 1420 - 1425
  • [5] Parental duties and prenatal screening: Does an offer of prenatal screening lead women to believe that they are morally compelled to test?
    Garcia, Elisa
    Timmermans, DanielleR. M.
    van Leeuwen, Evert
    [J]. MIDWIFERY, 2012, 28 (06) : E837 - E843
  • [6] Gekas J, 1999, PRENATAL DIAG, V19, P1, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199901)19:1<1::AID-PD456>3.0.CO
  • [7] 2-S
  • [8] 'This is just what you do when you are pregnant': a qualitative study of prospective parents in Iceland who accept nuchal translucency screening
    Gottfredsdottir, Helga
    Sandall, Jane
    Bjoernsdottir, Kristin
    [J]. MIDWIFERY, 2009, 25 (06) : 711 - 720
  • [9] Implementation of combined ultrasound and biochemistry for risk evaluation of chromosomal abnormalities during the first trimester in Sweden
    Ingvoldstad, Charlotta
    Ohman, Susanne Georgsson
    Lindgren, Peter
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2014, 93 (09) : 868 - 873
  • [10] Santalahti P, 1998, PRENATAL DIAG, V18, P153, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199802)18:2<153::AID-PD240>3.3.CO