Hazard degree identification of goafs based on scale effect of structure by RS-TOPSIS method

被引:11
作者
Hu Jian-hua [1 ]
Shang Jun-long [1 ,3 ]
Zhou Ke-ping [1 ]
Chen Yi-kai [1 ]
Ning Yu-lin [1 ]
Liu Lang [1 ,2 ]
Aliyu, Mohammed M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Resources & Safety Engn, Changsha 410083, Peoples R China
[2] Xian Univ Sci & Technol, Energy Sch, Xian 710054, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Leeds, Sch Earth & Environm, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
goaf; RS-TOPSIS method; hazard degree; scale effect;
D O I
10.1007/s11771-015-2571-1
中图分类号
TF [冶金工业];
学科分类号
0806 ;
摘要
In order to precisely predict the hazard degree of goaf (HDG), the RS-TOPSIS model was built based on the results of expert investigation. To evaluate the HDG in the underground mine, five structure size factors, i.e. goaf span, exposed area, goaf height, goaf depth, and pillar width, were selected as the evaluation indexes. And based on rough dependability in rough set (RS) theory, the weights of evaluation indexes were identified by calculating rough dependability between evaluation indexes and evaluation results. Fourty goafs in some mines of western China, whose indexes parameters were measured by cavity monitoring system (CMS), were taken as evaluation objects. In addition, the characteristic parameters of five grades' typical goafs were built according to the interval limits value of single index evaluation. Then, using the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), five-category classification of HDG was realized based on closeness degree, and the HDG was also identified. Results show that the five-category identification of mine goafs could be realized by RS-TOPSIS method, based on the structure-scale-effect. The classification results are consistent with those of numerical simulation based on stress and displacement, while the coincidence rate is up to 92.5%. Furthermore, the results are more conservative to safety evaluation than numerical simulation, thus demonstrating that the proposed method is more easier, reasonable and more definite for HDG identification.
引用
收藏
页码:684 / 692
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   A utility-based fuzzy TOPSIS method for energy efficient network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks [J].
Chamodrakas, Ioannis ;
Martakos, Drakoulis .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2011, 11 (04) :3734-3743
[2]  
Chen Q., 2009, STUDY SYNERGISM HIDD
[3]  
[程锦 Cheng Jin], 2011, [机械工程学报, Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering], V47, P27
[4]  
DUAN Yu, 2005, FUZZY SYNTHETIC ASSE
[5]  
FENNER T., 1995, MINING ENG, V47, P280
[6]   A multi-dimensional approach to the assessment of tunnel excavation methods [J].
Golestanifar, Mojtaba ;
Goshtasbi, Kamran ;
Jafarian, Mostafa ;
Adnani, Siamak .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2011, 48 (07) :1077-1085
[7]  
Gong F.-Q., 2010, J MIN SAF ENG, V27, P30
[8]  
GONG Feng-qiang, 2008, CHINESE J ROCK MECH, V27, P321
[9]  
Guan QC, 2003, 7TH WORLD MULTICONFERENCE ON SYSTEMICS, CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS, VOL XIV, PROCEEDINGS, P28
[10]   Advanced techniques in site characterization and mining hazard detection for the underground coal industry [J].
Hanson, DR ;
Vandergrift, TL ;
DeMarco, MJ ;
Hanna, K .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2002, 50 (1-4) :275-301