Sustainability, foresight and contested futures: exploring visions and pathways in the transition to a hydrogen economy

被引:34
作者
Eames, Malcolm [1 ]
McDowall, William [2 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Welsh Sch Architecture, Low Carbon Res Inst, Cardiff, Wales
[2] UCL, UCL Energy Inst, London WC1E 6BT, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
scenario planning; technology and innovation studies; energy industry; foresight; MULTICRITERIA EVALUATION; INSTITUTIONS; EXPECTATIONS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1080/09537325.2010.497255
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper reports an innovative foresighting study which constructed a set of hydrogen futures and pathways to them, in order to inform the transition to a sustainable hydrogen economy. Combining backcasting and multi-criteria appraisal the authors developed a participatory expert stakeholder-led methodology to build and appraise a set of visions, which sought to acknowledge the diversity of possible hydrogen futures and contested claims as to their sustainability. A set of transition scenarios were then developed exploring the dynamics and governance of the large-scale socio-technical changes that would be required for the emergence of the different visions. While aspects of this project have been reported elsewhere, this paper seeks to: (1) locate the work with respect to broader developments in the fields of foresight, expectations and socio-technical transitions to sustainability; (2) provide a description of the UKSHEC sustainable futures methodology; and (3) reflect on key insights for research and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 692
页数:22
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, SYSTEM INNOVATION TR
[2]   Learning for sustainability transition through bounded socio-technical experiments in personal mobility [J].
Brown, HS ;
Vergragt, P ;
Green, K ;
Berchicci, L .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2003, 15 (03) :291-315
[3]  
Dierkes M., 1996, Visions of technology: Social institutional factors shaping the development of new technologies
[4]  
*DTI, 2003, OUR COMM FUT CREAT L
[5]  
EAMES M, 2005, 10 POL STUD I
[6]  
Eames M., 2006, 19 UKSHEC POL STUD I
[7]   Negotiating contested visions and place-specific expectations of the hydrogen economy [J].
Eames, Malcolm ;
McDowall, William ;
Hodson, Mike ;
Marvin, Simon .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2006, 18 (3-4) :361-374
[8]  
Elzen B., 2004, System innovation and the transition to sustainability. Theory, P251, DOI 10.4337/9781845423421.00024
[9]   THE WORTH OF A SONGBIRD - ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS AS A POST-NORMAL SCIENCE [J].
FUNTOWICZ, SO ;
RAVETZ, JR .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1994, 10 (03) :197-207
[10]   Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study [J].
Geels, FW .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2002, 31 (8-9) :1257-1274