A Novel Scoring Instrument to Assess Donor Site Morbidity After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With a Patellar Tendon Autograft at 2-Year Follow-up Using Contemporary Graft-Harvesting Techniques

被引:17
作者
Hacken, Brittney A. [1 ,2 ]
Keyt, Lucas K. [1 ,2 ]
Leland, Devin P. [1 ,2 ]
LaPrade, Matthew D. [1 ,2 ]
Camp, Christopher L. [1 ,2 ]
Levy, Bruce A. [1 ,2 ]
Stuart, Michael J. [1 ,2 ]
Krych, Aaron J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Orthoped Surg, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
ACL; patellar tendon; donor site morbidity; autograft harvest; outcome score; HAMSTRING TENDON; KNEE; SEMITENDINOSUS; LEVEL; ACL; COMPLICATIONS; SYMPTOMS; REGISTRY;
D O I
10.1177/2325967120925482
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Donor site morbidity after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autograft is clinically significant, but evidence with contemporary techniques is lacking. Purpose: To (1) evaluate donor site morbidity at a single institution using modern techniques of BTB autograft harvest at 2-year follow-up, (2) develop a 10-question donor site morbidity instrument, and (3) compare this instrument against traditional outcome tools. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: We analyzed the 2-year follow-up outcomes of 200 consecutive patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with a BTB autograft performed by 2 surgeons at a single institution. The surgical technique utilized modern and consistent BTB autograft harvest, including graft sizing, patellar tendon and peritenon closure, and patellar and tibial donor site bone grafting. There were 187 patients included, with 13 patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction excluded. An original 10-question scoring instrument evaluating donor site morbidity was administered to each patient (score, 0-100) and compared against each patient's International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores. Results: Overall, 13.9% of patients were noted to have anterior knee pain with activity at 2-year follow-up. Moreover, 3.7% of patients reported an inability to kneel on hard surfaces but had no problems on soft surfaces; 5.9% of patients reported mild discomfort but were able to kneel on all surfaces. Additionally, 75.4% of patients had a perfect (100/100) donor site morbidity score. The mean donor site morbidity score at 2-year follow-up was 98.3 +/- 3.4. There was a very strong correlation between the IKDC and Lysholm scores but only a strong and moderate correlation when the donor site morbidity score was compared with the IKDC and Lysholm scores, respectively. Conclusion: Donor site morbidity after ACL reconstruction with a BTB autograft was less frequent than reported in the existing literature. Some patients developed anterior knee pain; therefore, an informed discussion is advised. IKDC and Lysholm scores may not capture donor site symptoms after surgery. The 10-question donor site morbidity instrument may provide a more accurate assessment.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Bone-patellar tendon-bone compared with double semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts - A prospective, randomized clinical trial [J].
Aglietti, P ;
Giron, F ;
Buzzi, R ;
Biddau, F ;
Sasso, F .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2004, 86A (10) :2143-2155
[2]   Outcome measures in clinical ACL studies: an analysis of highly cited level I trials [J].
Ahmad, Sufian S. ;
Meyer, Johannes C. ;
Krismer, Anna M. ;
Ahmad, Suhaib S. ;
Evangelopoulos, Dimitrios S. ;
Hoppe, Sven ;
Kohl, Sandro .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2017, 25 (05) :1517-1527
[3]   Anterior cruciate ligament replacement: Comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts with two-strand hamstring grafts - A prospective, randomized study [J].
Beynnon, BD ;
Johnson, RJ ;
Fleming, BC ;
Kannus, P ;
Kaplan, M ;
Samani, J ;
Renstrom, P .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2002, 84A (09) :1503-1513
[4]  
Bonatus T J, 1991, Orthop Rev, V20, P770
[5]   Patellar tendon or semitendinosus tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?: A prospective randomized study with a two-year follow-up [J].
Ejerhed, L ;
Kartus, J ;
Sernert, N ;
Köhler, K ;
Karlsson, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2003, 31 (01) :19-25
[6]   Closure of Patellar Tendon Defect in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials [J].
Frank, Rachel M. ;
Mascarenhas, Randy ;
Haro, Marc ;
Verma, Nikhil N. ;
Cole, Brian J. ;
Bush-Joseph, Charles A. ;
Bach, Bernard R., Jr. .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2015, 31 (02) :329-338
[7]   Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A metaanalysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts [J].
Freedman, KB ;
D'Amato, MJ ;
Nedeff, DD ;
Kaz, A ;
Bach, BR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2003, 31 (01) :2-11
[8]   Lower Risk of Revision With Patellar Tendon Autografts Compared With Hamstring Autografts A Registry Study Based on 45,998 Primary ACL Reconstructions in Scandinavia [J].
Gifstad, Tone ;
Foss, Olav A. ;
Engebretsen, Lars ;
Lind, Martin ;
Forssblad, Magnus ;
Albrektsen, Grethe ;
Drogset, Jon Olav .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (10) :2319-2328
[9]   IKDC or KOOS Which One Captures Symptoms and Disabilities Most Important to Patients Who Have Undergone Initial Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? [J].
Hambly, Karen ;
Griva, Konstandina .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (07) :1395-1404
[10]   Complications following harvesting of patellar tendon or hamstring tendon grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Systematic review of literature [J].
Hardy, A. ;
Casabianca, L. ;
Andrieu, K. ;
Baverel, L. ;
Noailles, T. .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2017, 103 (08) :S245-S248