Quo vadis, paradox? Centripetal and centrifugal forces in theory development

被引:81
作者
Schad, Jonathan [1 ,2 ]
Lewis, Marianne W. [1 ]
Smith, Wendy K. [3 ]
机构
[1] City Univ London, Cass Business Sch, 106 Bunhill Row, London EC1Y 8TZ, England
[2] Univ Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Univ Delaware, Alfred Lerner Coll Business, 203 Alfred Lerner Hall, Newark, DE 19716 USA
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
centrifugal forces; centripetal forces; paradox theory; strategy research; theory development; CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY; MANAGERIAL SENSEMAKING; MANAGEMENT; CONTRADICTIONS; EXPLOITATION; EXPLORATION; INNOVATION; BUSINESS; MODEL; ORGANIZATIONS;
D O I
10.1177/1476127018786218
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Organizations increasingly face contradictory goals, multiple stakeholder expectations, and pluralistic missions that surface and intensify competing demands. Paradox theory offers a lens to understand and engage these tensions. Yet as research adopting a paradox lens continues to grow, scholars warn that its success could advance a dominant logic, which will ultimately hinder conceptual development and result in its downfall. We suggest that scholars can avoid this denigration by embracing theory development's driving forces-centripetal forces that define and buffer a conceptual core and centrifugal forces aimed at challenging the core and extending its boundaries. Although these forces' directions diverge, we depict these dual forces as paradoxical-contradictory and fundamentally interdependent. That is, we explore paradoxical forces of theory development to understand the development of paradox theory. We offer means to use, balance, and leverage these insights to help surface the black boxes in paradox research.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 119
页数:13
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation [J].
Andriopoulos, Constantine ;
Lewis, Marianne W. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (04) :696-717
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, ROUTLEDGE COMPANION
[3]  
[Anonymous], J MANAGEMENT STUDIES
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Oxford Handbook of Organisational Paradox
[5]  
[Anonymous], J MANAGEMENT STUDIES
[6]  
[Anonymous], OXFORD HDB ORG PARAD
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2017, OXFORD HDB ORG PARAD
[8]   Ambivalence in Organizations: A Multilevel Approach [J].
Ashforth, Blake E. ;
Rogers, Kristie M. ;
Pratt, Michael G. ;
Pradies, Camille .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2014, 25 (05) :1453-1478
[9]   Functions of Dysfunction: Managing the Dynamics of an Organizational Duality in a Natural Food Cooperative [J].
Ashforth, Blake E. ;
Reingen, Peter H. .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2014, 59 (03) :474-516
[10]  
Aust I., 2017, Oxford Handbook of Organizational Paradox, P413