Regional differences in impact investment: a theory of impact investing ecosystems

被引:33
作者
Roundy, Philip T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Entrepreneurship, Chattanooga, TN 37996 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Chattanooga, TN 37996 USA
关键词
Impact investing; Entrepreneurial ecosystems; Social entrepreneurship; Social impact; Socially responsible investing; ENTREPRENEURIAL ECOSYSTEMS; SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP; INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS; MUTUAL FUNDS; ORGANIZATIONS; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1108/SRJ-11-2018-0302
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose Impact investing, a type of values-based investing that combines financial investment with philanthropic goals, is receiving heightened scholarly and practitioner attention. The geography of impact investing, however, is largely unexamined, and it is not clear why some regional impact-investing communities are more vibrant than other communities. Regional differences in entrepreneurial activities are increasingly explained by differences in the vitality of entrepreneurial ecosystems, the set of interconnected forces that promote and sustain regional entrepreneurship. The purpose of this paper is to leverage insights from entrepreneurial ecosystems studies to understand the dynamics of communities that encourage and support impact investing. Design/methodology/approach To explain inter-regional differences in the prevalence and intensity of impact investing, this conceptual paper draws from research on entrepreneurial ecosystems and impact investment to theorize about the ecosystem attributes and components that drive vibrant impact investing communities. Findings It is theorized that vibrant impact investing ecosystems have three system-level attributes - diversity, cohesion and coordination - that are influenced by the core components of the ecosystems, including the characteristics of investors, the presence of social impact support organizations and cultural values that promote blending logics. Originality/value The theoretical model contributes to research on impact investing and hybrid organizing, produces concrete implications for ecosystem builders and sets an agenda for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 485
页数:19
相关论文
共 103 条
  • [1] The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach
    Acs, Zoltan J.
    Stam, Erik
    Audretsch, David B.
    O'Connor, Allan
    [J]. SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2017, 49 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [2] Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters
    Adger, WN
    Hughes, TP
    Folke, C
    Carpenter, SR
    Rockström, J
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2005, 309 (5737) : 1036 - 1039
  • [3] Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy
    Adner, Ron
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2017, 43 (01) : 39 - 58
  • [4] Coping with impact investing antagonistic objectives: A multistakeholder approach
    Alijani, Sharam
    Karyotis, Catherine
    [J]. RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2019, 47 : 10 - 17
  • [5] [Anonymous], ADM SCI Q
  • [6] [Anonymous], THESIS
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2016, UNDERSTANDING SOCIAL
  • [8] [Anonymous], IMP INV
  • [9] [Anonymous], IMPACT INVESTING EME
  • [10] [Anonymous], 39 INT C INF SYST SA