Factors affecting adenoma detection rate in a national flexible sigmoidoscopy screening programme: a retrospective analysis

被引:14
|
作者
Bevan, Roisin [1 ]
Blanks, Roger G. [2 ]
Nickerson, Claire [3 ]
Saunders, Brian P. [4 ]
Stebbing, John [5 ]
Tighe, Richard [6 ]
Veitch, Andrew M. [7 ]
Garrett, William [8 ]
Rees, Colin J. [9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] North Tees & Hartlepool NHS Fdn Trust, Stockton On Tees T519 8PE, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Canc Epidemiol Unit, Oxford, England
[3] NHS Canc Screening Programmes, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[4] St Marks Hosp, London, England
[5] Royal Surrey Cty Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Guildford, Surrey, England
[6] Norfolk & Norwich Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[7] Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, W Midlands, England
[8] Medway NHS Fdn Trust, Gillingham, England
[9] South Tyneside NHS Fdn Trust, South Shields, England
[10] Newcastle Univ, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
BASE-LINE FINDINGS; COLORECTAL-CANCER; PREPARATION-QUALITY; BOWEL PREPARATION; FUNNEL PLOTS; COLONOSCOPY; IMPACT; VARIABILITY; PERFORMANCE; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30387-X
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background A national colorectal cancer screening programme started in England in 2013, offering one-off flexible sigmoidoscopy to all men and women aged 55 years in addition to the biennial faecal occult blood testing programme offered to all individuals aged 60-74 years. We analysed data from six pilot flexible sigmoidoscopy screening centres to examine factors affecting the adenoma detection rate (ADR). Methods We did a retrospective analysis of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening procedures performed in individuals aged 55 years at six pilot sites in England as part of the National Health Service Bowel Scope Screening programme. ADR (number of procedures in which at least one adenoma was removed or biopsied, divided by total number of procedures) was calculated for each site and each endoscopist. Multiple regression models were used to examine the variation in ADR with withdrawal time and extent of examination, and the effect of other factors including comfort and bowel preparation on extent of examination. Findings The analysis included 8256 procedures done between May 7,2013, and May 6, 2014. The overall ADR was 9.1% (95% CI 8.5-9.8; 755 of 8256 procedures), varying from 7.4% (6.2-8.9) to 11.0% (9.1-13.4) by screening centre. The ADR was 11.5% (95% CI 10.6-12.5; 493 of 4299 procedures) in men and 6.6% (5.9-7.4; 262 of 3957 procedures) in women (p<0.0001). On multivariate analysis, factors associated with adenoma detection were male sex (relative risk 1.69, 95% CI 1.46-1.95; p<0.0001) and a withdrawal time from the splenic flexure of at least 3.25 min in negative procedures (1.22,1.00-1.48; p=0.045). However, increasing the withdrawal time to 4.0 min or more did not increase the likelihood of adenoma detection (1.22,0.99-1.51; p=0.057). Procedures not reaching the splenic flexure were associated with lower chance of adenoma detection (eg, 0.77,0.66-0.91; p=0.0015 for procedures reaching the descending colon), but there was no additional benefit associated with reaching the transverse colon (0.83, 0.67-1.02; p=0.069). Women (0.83, 0.80-0.87; p<0.0001), individuals with adequate (0.79, 0.76-0.83; p<0.0001) or poor (0.58, 0.51-0.67; p<0.0001) bowel preparation (compared with good bowel preparation), and those with mild (0.82, 0.76-0.88; p<0.0001) or moderate or severe (0.58, 0.51-0.66; p<0.0001) discomfort (compared with no discomfort) were less likely to have a procedure reaching the splenic flexure. Interpretation Key performance indicators for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening should be defined, including standards for insertion and withdrawal times, optimal depth, and bowel preparation. ADR could be improved by recommending a withdrawal time from the splenic flexure of at least 3.25 min (ideally 3.5-4.0 min). (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 247
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Factors predicting the colorectal adenoma detection rate in colonoscopic screening of a Chinese population A prospective study
    Wang, Han
    Wang, Pu
    Liu, Xiaogang
    Li, Liangping
    Xiao, Xun
    Liu, Peixi
    Zhang, Di
    Li, Yi
    Xu, Guangre
    Tu, Mengtian
    Song, Yan
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (15)
  • [42] The underestimated preventive effects of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: re-analysis and meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Brenner, Hermann
    Heisser, Thomas
    Cardoso, Rafael
    Hoffmeister, Michael
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 39 (07) : 743 - 751
  • [43] Calculating the adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopies only: Is it necessary? Can it be gamed?
    Rex, Douglas K.
    Ponugoti, Prasanna L.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 49 (11) : 1069 - 1074
  • [44] Factors affecting bowel preparation and adenoma detection: patient or the doctor
    Jain, Deepanshu
    Singhal, Shashideep
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 82 (03) : 583 - 583
  • [45] Split-dose preparation for colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a randomised controlled trial in an organised screening programme
    Radaelli, F.
    Paggi, S.
    Hassan, C.
    Senore, C.
    Fasoli, R.
    Anderloni, A.
    Buffoli, F.
    Savarese, M. F.
    Spinzi, G.
    Rex, D. K.
    Repici, A.
    GUT, 2017, 66 (02) : 270 - 277
  • [46] Morning versus afternoon adenoma detection rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Barakat, Mohamed
    Panchal, Ankur
    Abdelfatah, Mohamed M.
    Elhanafi, Sherif
    Carr-Locke, David L.
    Othman, Mohamed O.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 32 (04) : 467 - 474
  • [47] Impact of differences in adenoma and proximal serrated polyp detection rate on the long-term effectiveness of FIT-based colorectal cancer screening
    Bronzwaer, Maxime E. S.
    Greuter, Marjolein J. E.
    Bleijenberg, Arne G. C.
    IJspeert, Joep E. G.
    Dekker, Evelien
    Coupe, Veerle M. H.
    BMC CANCER, 2018, 18
  • [48] Systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence for flexible sigmoidoscopy as a screening method for the prevention of colorectal cancer
    Littlejohn, C.
    Hilton, S.
    Macfarlane, G. J.
    Phull, P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 99 (11) : 1488 - 1500
  • [49] Reduced incidence and mortality from colorectal cancer with flexible-sigmoidoscopy screening: A meta-analysis
    Shroff, Jennifer
    Thosani, Nirav
    Batra, Sachin
    Singh, Harminder
    Guha, Sushovan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (48) : 18466 - 18476
  • [50] Adenoma Detection Rate in Average-Risk Population: An Observational Consecutive Retrospective Study
    He, Xiaoyan
    Lv, Xiangyin
    Zhang, Binbin
    Ying, Xiaoxuan
    Hu, Chiyu
    Zhou, Xiaoying
    Hu, Jianwen
    CANCER CONTROL, 2023, 30