Factors affecting adenoma detection rate in a national flexible sigmoidoscopy screening programme: a retrospective analysis

被引:14
|
作者
Bevan, Roisin [1 ]
Blanks, Roger G. [2 ]
Nickerson, Claire [3 ]
Saunders, Brian P. [4 ]
Stebbing, John [5 ]
Tighe, Richard [6 ]
Veitch, Andrew M. [7 ]
Garrett, William [8 ]
Rees, Colin J. [9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] North Tees & Hartlepool NHS Fdn Trust, Stockton On Tees T519 8PE, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Canc Epidemiol Unit, Oxford, England
[3] NHS Canc Screening Programmes, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[4] St Marks Hosp, London, England
[5] Royal Surrey Cty Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Guildford, Surrey, England
[6] Norfolk & Norwich Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[7] Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, W Midlands, England
[8] Medway NHS Fdn Trust, Gillingham, England
[9] South Tyneside NHS Fdn Trust, South Shields, England
[10] Newcastle Univ, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
BASE-LINE FINDINGS; COLORECTAL-CANCER; PREPARATION-QUALITY; BOWEL PREPARATION; FUNNEL PLOTS; COLONOSCOPY; IMPACT; VARIABILITY; PERFORMANCE; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30387-X
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background A national colorectal cancer screening programme started in England in 2013, offering one-off flexible sigmoidoscopy to all men and women aged 55 years in addition to the biennial faecal occult blood testing programme offered to all individuals aged 60-74 years. We analysed data from six pilot flexible sigmoidoscopy screening centres to examine factors affecting the adenoma detection rate (ADR). Methods We did a retrospective analysis of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening procedures performed in individuals aged 55 years at six pilot sites in England as part of the National Health Service Bowel Scope Screening programme. ADR (number of procedures in which at least one adenoma was removed or biopsied, divided by total number of procedures) was calculated for each site and each endoscopist. Multiple regression models were used to examine the variation in ADR with withdrawal time and extent of examination, and the effect of other factors including comfort and bowel preparation on extent of examination. Findings The analysis included 8256 procedures done between May 7,2013, and May 6, 2014. The overall ADR was 9.1% (95% CI 8.5-9.8; 755 of 8256 procedures), varying from 7.4% (6.2-8.9) to 11.0% (9.1-13.4) by screening centre. The ADR was 11.5% (95% CI 10.6-12.5; 493 of 4299 procedures) in men and 6.6% (5.9-7.4; 262 of 3957 procedures) in women (p<0.0001). On multivariate analysis, factors associated with adenoma detection were male sex (relative risk 1.69, 95% CI 1.46-1.95; p<0.0001) and a withdrawal time from the splenic flexure of at least 3.25 min in negative procedures (1.22,1.00-1.48; p=0.045). However, increasing the withdrawal time to 4.0 min or more did not increase the likelihood of adenoma detection (1.22,0.99-1.51; p=0.057). Procedures not reaching the splenic flexure were associated with lower chance of adenoma detection (eg, 0.77,0.66-0.91; p=0.0015 for procedures reaching the descending colon), but there was no additional benefit associated with reaching the transverse colon (0.83, 0.67-1.02; p=0.069). Women (0.83, 0.80-0.87; p<0.0001), individuals with adequate (0.79, 0.76-0.83; p<0.0001) or poor (0.58, 0.51-0.67; p<0.0001) bowel preparation (compared with good bowel preparation), and those with mild (0.82, 0.76-0.88; p<0.0001) or moderate or severe (0.58, 0.51-0.66; p<0.0001) discomfort (compared with no discomfort) were less likely to have a procedure reaching the splenic flexure. Interpretation Key performance indicators for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening should be defined, including standards for insertion and withdrawal times, optimal depth, and bowel preparation. ADR could be improved by recommending a withdrawal time from the splenic flexure of at least 3.25 min (ideally 3.5-4.0 min). (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 247
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Adenoma Detection Rate on Colonoscopy: an Argument for Focused Screening?
    N. Brant
    D. Apple
    M. Downs
    R. Stadler
    D. Rohan Jeyarajah
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2022, 26 : 1954 - 1956
  • [32] Polyp detection rate may predict adenoma detection rate: a meta-analysis
    Niv, Yaron
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 30 (03) : 247 - 251
  • [33] EVIDENCE FACTORS IN A CASE-CONTROL STUDY WITH APPLICATION TO THE EFFECT OF FLEXIBLE SIGMOIDOSCOPY SCREENING ON COLORECTAL CANCER
    Karmakar, Bikram
    Doubeni, Chyke A.
    Small, Dylan S.
    ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2020, 14 (02) : 829 - 849
  • [34] Adenoma Detection Rate on Colonoscopy: an Argument for Focused Screening?
    Brant, N.
    Apple, D.
    Downs, M.
    Stadler, R.
    Jeyarajah, D. Rohan
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2022, 26 (09) : 1954 - 1956
  • [35] Flexible Sigmoidoscopy and CT Colonography Screening: Patients' Experience with and Factors for Undergoing Screening-Insight from the Proteus Colon Trial
    Senore, Carlo
    Correale, Loredana
    Regge, Daniele
    Hassan, Cesare
    Iussich, Gabriella
    Silvani, Marco
    Arrigoni, Arrigo
    Morra, Lia
    Segnan, Nereo
    RADIOLOGY, 2018, 286 (03) : 885 - 895
  • [36] Impact of feedback on adenoma detection rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Boregowda, Umesha
    Desai, Madhav
    Nutalapati, Venkat
    Paleti, Swathi
    Olyaee, Mojtaba
    Rastogi, Amit
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 34 (02): : 214 - +
  • [37] Time to benefit for colorectal cancer screening: survival meta-analysis of flexible sigmoidoscopy trials
    Tang, Victoria
    Boscardin, W. John
    Stijacic-Cenzer, Irena
    Lee, Sei J.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 350
  • [38] Comparison of adenoma detection rate in Hispanics and whites undergoing first screening colonoscopy: a retrospective chart review
    Thoma, Matthew N.
    Cantisano, Brenda G. Jimenez
    Hernandez, Adrian V.
    Perez, Alejandro
    Castro, Fernando
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2013, 77 (03) : 430 - 435
  • [39] PATIENT AND COLONOSCOPY FACTORS INFLUENCING ADENOMA DETECTION IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING COLONOSCOPY IN THE NHS BOWEL CANCER SCREENING PROGRAMME
    Lee, T. J. W.
    Rees, C. J.
    Blanks, R. G.
    Moss, S. M.
    Nickerson, C.
    Wright, K. C.
    James, P. W.
    McNally, R. J. Q.
    Patnick, J.
    Rutter, M. D.
    GUT, 2011, 60 : A68 - A68
  • [40] Segmental Withdrawal During Screening Colonoscopy Does Not Increase Adenoma Detection Rate
    Avalos, Danny J.
    Jia, Yi
    Zuckerman, Marc J.
    Michael, Majd
    Gonzalez-Martinez, Jose
    Mendoza-Ladd, Antonio
    Garcia, Cesar J.
    Sunny, Joseph
    Delgado, Veronica C.
    Hernandez, Berenice
    Dwivedi, Alok K.
    Mallawaarachchi, Indika V.
    Dodoo, Christopher
    Othman, Mohamed O.
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 113 (09) : 438 - 446