Factors affecting adenoma detection rate in a national flexible sigmoidoscopy screening programme: a retrospective analysis

被引:14
|
作者
Bevan, Roisin [1 ]
Blanks, Roger G. [2 ]
Nickerson, Claire [3 ]
Saunders, Brian P. [4 ]
Stebbing, John [5 ]
Tighe, Richard [6 ]
Veitch, Andrew M. [7 ]
Garrett, William [8 ]
Rees, Colin J. [9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] North Tees & Hartlepool NHS Fdn Trust, Stockton On Tees T519 8PE, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Canc Epidemiol Unit, Oxford, England
[3] NHS Canc Screening Programmes, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[4] St Marks Hosp, London, England
[5] Royal Surrey Cty Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Guildford, Surrey, England
[6] Norfolk & Norwich Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[7] Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, W Midlands, England
[8] Medway NHS Fdn Trust, Gillingham, England
[9] South Tyneside NHS Fdn Trust, South Shields, England
[10] Newcastle Univ, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
BASE-LINE FINDINGS; COLORECTAL-CANCER; PREPARATION-QUALITY; BOWEL PREPARATION; FUNNEL PLOTS; COLONOSCOPY; IMPACT; VARIABILITY; PERFORMANCE; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30387-X
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background A national colorectal cancer screening programme started in England in 2013, offering one-off flexible sigmoidoscopy to all men and women aged 55 years in addition to the biennial faecal occult blood testing programme offered to all individuals aged 60-74 years. We analysed data from six pilot flexible sigmoidoscopy screening centres to examine factors affecting the adenoma detection rate (ADR). Methods We did a retrospective analysis of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening procedures performed in individuals aged 55 years at six pilot sites in England as part of the National Health Service Bowel Scope Screening programme. ADR (number of procedures in which at least one adenoma was removed or biopsied, divided by total number of procedures) was calculated for each site and each endoscopist. Multiple regression models were used to examine the variation in ADR with withdrawal time and extent of examination, and the effect of other factors including comfort and bowel preparation on extent of examination. Findings The analysis included 8256 procedures done between May 7,2013, and May 6, 2014. The overall ADR was 9.1% (95% CI 8.5-9.8; 755 of 8256 procedures), varying from 7.4% (6.2-8.9) to 11.0% (9.1-13.4) by screening centre. The ADR was 11.5% (95% CI 10.6-12.5; 493 of 4299 procedures) in men and 6.6% (5.9-7.4; 262 of 3957 procedures) in women (p<0.0001). On multivariate analysis, factors associated with adenoma detection were male sex (relative risk 1.69, 95% CI 1.46-1.95; p<0.0001) and a withdrawal time from the splenic flexure of at least 3.25 min in negative procedures (1.22,1.00-1.48; p=0.045). However, increasing the withdrawal time to 4.0 min or more did not increase the likelihood of adenoma detection (1.22,0.99-1.51; p=0.057). Procedures not reaching the splenic flexure were associated with lower chance of adenoma detection (eg, 0.77,0.66-0.91; p=0.0015 for procedures reaching the descending colon), but there was no additional benefit associated with reaching the transverse colon (0.83, 0.67-1.02; p=0.069). Women (0.83, 0.80-0.87; p<0.0001), individuals with adequate (0.79, 0.76-0.83; p<0.0001) or poor (0.58, 0.51-0.67; p<0.0001) bowel preparation (compared with good bowel preparation), and those with mild (0.82, 0.76-0.88; p<0.0001) or moderate or severe (0.58, 0.51-0.66; p<0.0001) discomfort (compared with no discomfort) were less likely to have a procedure reaching the splenic flexure. Interpretation Key performance indicators for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening should be defined, including standards for insertion and withdrawal times, optimal depth, and bowel preparation. ADR could be improved by recommending a withdrawal time from the splenic flexure of at least 3.25 min (ideally 3.5-4.0 min). (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 247
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy according to the adenoma detection rate
    Hassan, Cesare
    Rex, Douglas K.
    Zullo, Angelo
    Kaminski, Michal F.
    UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL, 2015, 3 (02) : 200 - 207
  • [22] Colonoscopic factors associated with adenoma detection in a national colorectal cancer screening program
    Lee, Thomas J. W.
    Rees, Colin J.
    Blanks, Roger G.
    Moss, Sue M.
    Nickerson, Claire
    Wright, Karen C.
    James, Peter W.
    McNally, Richard J. Q.
    Patnick, Julietta
    Rutter, Matthew D.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 46 (03) : 203 - 211
  • [23] Adenoma miss rate determined by very shortly repeated colonoscopy Retrospective analysis of data from a single tertiary medical center in China
    Wang, Cheng-Long
    Huang, Zhi-Ping
    Chen, Kai
    Yan, Fei-Hu
    Zhu, Lang-Lang
    Shan, Yong-Qi
    Gao, Yong-Jun-Yi
    Li, Bai-Rong
    Wang, Hao
    Yu, En-Da
    Zhao, Zi-Ye
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (38)
  • [24] Endocuff Vision improves adenoma detection rate in a large screening-related cohort
    Forbes, Nauzer
    Hilsden, Robert J.
    Ruan, Yibing
    Poirier, Abbey E.
    O'Sullivan, Dylan E.
    Craig, Kyla M.
    Kerrison, Diana
    Brenner, Darren R.
    Heitman, Steven J.
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2021, 09 (11) : E1583 - E1592
  • [25] Difference in Physician- and Patient-Dependent Factors Contributing to Adenoma Detection Rate and Serrated Polyp Detection Rate
    Cavicchi, Maryan
    Tharsis, Gaelle
    Burtin, Pascal
    Cattan, Philippe
    Venezia, Franck
    Tordjman, Gilles
    Gillet, Agnes
    Samama, Joelle
    Nahon-Uzan, Karine
    Karsenti, David
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2019, 64 (12) : 3579 - 3588
  • [26] Association between endoscopist adenoma detection rate and serrated polyp detection: Retrospective analysis of over 200,000 screening colonoscopies
    Penz, Daniela
    Pammer, Daniel
    Waldmann, Elisabeth
    Asaturi, Arno
    Szymanska, Aleksrandra
    Trauner, Michael
    Ferlitsch, Monika
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2024, 12 (04) : E488 - E497
  • [27] Association of Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenoma Characteristics With Colorectal Cancer Mortality After Screening Colonoscopy
    Waldmann, Elisabeth
    Kammerlander, Andreas A.
    Gessl, Irina
    Penz, Daniela
    Majcher, Barbara
    Hinterberger, Anna
    Bretthauer, Michael
    Trauner, Michael H.
    Ferlitsch, Monika
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 19 (09) : 1890 - 1898
  • [28] MEASURING THE QUALITY OF SCREENING COLONOSCOPY: MOVING ON FROM ADENOMA DETECTION RATE
    Lee, T. J. W.
    Nickerson, C.
    Rees, C. J.
    Rutter, M. D.
    GUT, 2011, 60 : A46 - A46
  • [29] Interval cancer after colonoscopy in the Austrian National Screening Programme: influence of physician and patient factors
    Waldmann, Elisabeth
    Penz, Daniela
    Sinkovec, Hana
    Heinze, Georg
    Rinner, Christoph
    Jiricka, Lena
    Majcher, Barbara
    Hinterberger, Anna
    Trauner, Michael
    Ferlitsch, Monika
    GUT, 2021, 70 (07) : 1309 - 1317
  • [30] Analysis of adenoma detection rate of colonoscopy among trainees
    Song, Young Min
    Han, Kyung Su
    Kim, Byung Chang
    Hong, Chang Won
    Kim, Bun
    Kim, Min Chul
    Jin, Myeong Jae
    Sohn, Dae Kyung
    ANNALS OF COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2024, 40 (06) : 548 - 554