Factors affecting adenoma detection rate in a national flexible sigmoidoscopy screening programme: a retrospective analysis

被引:14
|
作者
Bevan, Roisin [1 ]
Blanks, Roger G. [2 ]
Nickerson, Claire [3 ]
Saunders, Brian P. [4 ]
Stebbing, John [5 ]
Tighe, Richard [6 ]
Veitch, Andrew M. [7 ]
Garrett, William [8 ]
Rees, Colin J. [9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] North Tees & Hartlepool NHS Fdn Trust, Stockton On Tees T519 8PE, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Canc Epidemiol Unit, Oxford, England
[3] NHS Canc Screening Programmes, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[4] St Marks Hosp, London, England
[5] Royal Surrey Cty Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Guildford, Surrey, England
[6] Norfolk & Norwich Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[7] Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, W Midlands, England
[8] Medway NHS Fdn Trust, Gillingham, England
[9] South Tyneside NHS Fdn Trust, South Shields, England
[10] Newcastle Univ, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
BASE-LINE FINDINGS; COLORECTAL-CANCER; PREPARATION-QUALITY; BOWEL PREPARATION; FUNNEL PLOTS; COLONOSCOPY; IMPACT; VARIABILITY; PERFORMANCE; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30387-X
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background A national colorectal cancer screening programme started in England in 2013, offering one-off flexible sigmoidoscopy to all men and women aged 55 years in addition to the biennial faecal occult blood testing programme offered to all individuals aged 60-74 years. We analysed data from six pilot flexible sigmoidoscopy screening centres to examine factors affecting the adenoma detection rate (ADR). Methods We did a retrospective analysis of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening procedures performed in individuals aged 55 years at six pilot sites in England as part of the National Health Service Bowel Scope Screening programme. ADR (number of procedures in which at least one adenoma was removed or biopsied, divided by total number of procedures) was calculated for each site and each endoscopist. Multiple regression models were used to examine the variation in ADR with withdrawal time and extent of examination, and the effect of other factors including comfort and bowel preparation on extent of examination. Findings The analysis included 8256 procedures done between May 7,2013, and May 6, 2014. The overall ADR was 9.1% (95% CI 8.5-9.8; 755 of 8256 procedures), varying from 7.4% (6.2-8.9) to 11.0% (9.1-13.4) by screening centre. The ADR was 11.5% (95% CI 10.6-12.5; 493 of 4299 procedures) in men and 6.6% (5.9-7.4; 262 of 3957 procedures) in women (p<0.0001). On multivariate analysis, factors associated with adenoma detection were male sex (relative risk 1.69, 95% CI 1.46-1.95; p<0.0001) and a withdrawal time from the splenic flexure of at least 3.25 min in negative procedures (1.22,1.00-1.48; p=0.045). However, increasing the withdrawal time to 4.0 min or more did not increase the likelihood of adenoma detection (1.22,0.99-1.51; p=0.057). Procedures not reaching the splenic flexure were associated with lower chance of adenoma detection (eg, 0.77,0.66-0.91; p=0.0015 for procedures reaching the descending colon), but there was no additional benefit associated with reaching the transverse colon (0.83, 0.67-1.02; p=0.069). Women (0.83, 0.80-0.87; p<0.0001), individuals with adequate (0.79, 0.76-0.83; p<0.0001) or poor (0.58, 0.51-0.67; p<0.0001) bowel preparation (compared with good bowel preparation), and those with mild (0.82, 0.76-0.88; p<0.0001) or moderate or severe (0.58, 0.51-0.66; p<0.0001) discomfort (compared with no discomfort) were less likely to have a procedure reaching the splenic flexure. Interpretation Key performance indicators for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening should be defined, including standards for insertion and withdrawal times, optimal depth, and bowel preparation. ADR could be improved by recommending a withdrawal time from the splenic flexure of at least 3.25 min (ideally 3.5-4.0 min). (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 247
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Uptake of faecal immunochemical test screening among nonparticipants in a flexible sigmoidoscopy screening programme
    Hol, Lieke
    Kuipers, Ernst J.
    van Ballegooijen, Marjolein
    van Vuuren, Anneke J.
    Reijerink, Jaqueline C. I. Y.
    Habbema, Dik J. F.
    van Leerdam, Monique E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 130 (09) : 2096 - 2102
  • [2] Assessment of the multiple components of the variability in the adenoma detection rate in sigmoidoscopy screening, and lessons for training
    Fracchia, M.
    Senore, C.
    Armaroli, P.
    Ferraris, R.
    DiPlacido, R.
    Musso, A.
    Turco, D.
    Bellisario, C.
    Baldi, I.
    Segnan, N.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 42 (06) : 448 - 455
  • [3] The analysis of multilevel factors affecting adenoma detection rates for colonoscopies: a large-scale retrospective study
    Huang, Liang
    Hu, Yue
    Liu, Shan
    Jin, Bo
    Lu, Bin
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [4] Factors associated with inadequate colorectal cancer screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy
    Laiyemo, Adeyinka O.
    Doubeni, Chyke
    Pinsky, Paul F.
    Doria-Rose, V. Paul
    Sanderson, Andrew K., II
    Bresalier, Robert
    Weissfeld, Joel
    Schoen, Robert E.
    Marcus, Pamela M.
    Prorok, Philip C.
    Berg, Christine D.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 36 (04) : 395 - 399
  • [5] Difficult or incomplete flexible sigmoidoscopy: Implications for a screening programme
    Stewart, BT
    Keck, JO
    Duncan, AV
    Santamaria, NM
    Allen, P
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 69 (01): : 19 - 21
  • [6] Implementing a national flexible sigmoidoscopy screening program: results of the English early pilot
    Bevan, Roisin
    Rubin, Greg
    Sofianopoulou, Eleni
    Patnick, Julietta
    Rees, Colin J.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 47 (03) : 225 - 231
  • [7] Uptake of Bowel Scope (Flexible Sigmoidoscopy) Screening in the English National Programme: the first 14 months
    McGregor, Lesley M.
    Bonello, Bernardette
    Kerrison, Robert S.
    Nickerson, Claire
    Baio, Gianluca
    Berkman, Lindy
    Rees, Colin J.
    Atkin, Wendy
    Wardle, Jane
    von Wagner, Christian
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2016, 23 (02) : 77 - 82
  • [8] Retrospective analysis of pre- and peri-operative imaging in confirmed proximal colonic cancers - possible implications for screening flexible sigmoidoscopy
    Peravali, R.
    Kandiah, K.
    Surah, A.
    Murria, P.
    Taniere, P.
    Radley, S.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2009, 11 (02) : 146 - 149
  • [9] The analysis of multilevel factors affecting adenoma detection rates for colonoscopies: a large-scale retrospective study
    Liang Huang
    Yue Hu
    Shan Liu
    Bo Jin
    Bin Lu
    BMC Gastroenterology, 21
  • [10] Improving uptake of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: a randomized trial of nonparticipant reminders in the English Screening Programme
    Kerrison, Robert S.
    McGregor, LesleyM.
    Marshall, Sarah
    Isitt, John
    Counsell, Nicholas
    Rees, Colin J.
    von Wagner, Christian
    ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 49 (01) : 35 - 43