Differences between hatchery-raised and wild blue crabs: Implications for stock enhancement potential

被引:53
作者
Davis, JLD
Young-Williams, AC
Aguilar, R
Carswell, BL
Goodison, MR
Hines, AH
Kramer, MA
Zohar, Y
Zmora, O
机构
[1] Smithsonian Environm Res Ctr, Edgewater, MD 20137 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Inst Biotechnol, Ctr Marine Biotechnol, Baltimore, MD 21202 USA
基金
美国海洋和大气管理局;
关键词
D O I
10.1577/T03-004
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Stock enhancement of severely exploited, recruitment-limited fisheries has been controversial for several reasons, one of which is the lack of information about competency, competitiveness, and survivorship of hatchery-reared individuals released into the field. Because enhancement efforts have focused on finfish, even less information is available with which to assess enhancement potential of crustaceans. The Chesapeake Bay stock of blue crabs Callinectes sapidus has declined by more than 80% over the past 12 years and has exhibited recruitment limitation, leading to recent efforts to study the potential of enhancing populations with hatchery-reared juveniles. To assess how hatchery-raised juvenile blue crabs may fare after release into the Chesapeake Bay, we compared several aspects of hatchery and wild crabs. Hatchery crabs readily fed on natural prey, moved in the field similarly to wild crabs, and grew at rates similar to those of wild crabs; however, the two crab groups differed in other factors important to field survival. Prerelease and laboratory-held hatchery crabs had different carapace morphology (smaller spines) than wild crabs, though spine lengths increased to normal proportions by several weeks after release. Hatchery crabs did not initially bury in sediment as often as wild crabs, suggesting inexperience with an important predator escape response. Hatchery crabs were also,preyed upon at higher rates in the field than wild crabs. Conditioning experiments suggest that inexperience with sediment and low burial rates were not the main cause of higher predation. By identifying areas in which hatchery individuals may be relatively weak and deficits that can potentially be mitigated, studies such as this can lead to improving the success of hatchery-raised individuals in the held. On a broader scale, such studies also contribute to determining whether stock enhancement is possible in the case of the Chesapeake blue crab.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
Appeldoorn R.S., 1983, Proceedings of the Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute, V35, P89
[2]  
Ariyama H., 2000, B OSAKA PREFECTURAL, V12, P1
[3]   Bivalve enhancement and restoration strategies in Florida, USA [J].
Arnold, WS .
HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2001, 465 (1-3) :7-19
[4]  
Bannister RCA, 1998, B MAR SCI, V62, P369
[5]  
Barber BJ, 1998, J SHELLFISH RES, V17, P1171
[6]   Interactive effects of initial size, stocking density, and type of predator deterrent netting on survival and growth of cultured juveniles of the soft-shell clam, Mya arenaria L., in eastern Maine [J].
Beal, BF ;
Kraus, MG .
AQUACULTURE, 2002, 208 (1-2) :81-111
[7]   New species for coastal aquaculture in the tropical Pacific - constraints, prospects and considerations [J].
Bell, JD ;
Gervis, M .
AQUACULTURE INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 7 (04) :207-223
[8]   The effects of hatchery and wild ancestry and experience on the relative ability of steelhead trout fry (Oncorhynchus mykiss) to avoid a benthic predator [J].
Berejikian, BA .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 1995, 52 (11) :2476-2482
[9]   Effects of hatchery and wild ancestry and rearing environments on the development of agonistic behavior in steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fry [J].
Berejikian, BA ;
Mathews, SB ;
Quinn, TP .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 1996, 53 (09) :2004-2014
[10]  
Bjornsson Bjorn, 1999, Rit Fiskideildar, V16, P271