Estimation of Q from surface seismic reflection data

被引:180
作者
Dasgupta, R [1 ]
Clark, RA
机构
[1] Oil India Ltd, GDAP Dept, Duliajan 786602, Assam, India
[2] Univ Leeds, Sch Earth Sci, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
D O I
10.1190/1.1444505
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Reliable estimates of the anelastic attenuation factor, Q, are desirable for improved resolution through inverse Q deconvolution and to facilitate amplitude analysis. Q is a useful petrophysical parameter itself, yet Q is rarely measured. Estimates must currently be made from borehole seismology. This paper presents a simple technique for determining Q from conventional surface seismic common midpoint (CMP) gathers. It is essentially the classic spectral ratio method applied on a trace-by-trace basis to a designatured and NMO stretch-corrected CMP gather. The variation of apparent Q versus offset (QVO) is extrapolated to give a zero-offset Q estimate. Studies on synthetics suggest that, for reasonable data quality (S/N ratios better than 3:1, shallow (<5 degrees) dips, and stacking velocity accuracy <5%), source-to-reflector average Q is recoverable to within some 3% and a for a specific interval (depending on its two-way time thickness and depth) is recoverable to 15-20%. Three case studies are reported. First, Q versus offset and vertical seismic profiling (VSP) a estimates for a southern North Sea line were in close agreement, validating the method. For Chalk, Mushelkalk-Keuper, and Bunter-Zechstein, Q was estimated as 130 +/- 15, 47 +/- 8, and 156 +/- 18, respectively. Next, two alternative lithological interpretations of a structure seen in a frontier area were discriminated between when Q estimates of 680 to 820 were obtained (compared to some 130-170 in the overlying units), favoring a metamorphic/crystalline lithology rather than (prospective) sediments. This was later confirmed by drilling. Third, a profile of Q estimates along a 200-ms-thick interval, known to include a gas reservoir, showed a clear and systematic reduction in Q to a low of 50 +/- 11, coincident with the maximum reservoir thickness, from some 90-105 outside the reservoir. Q for the reservoir interval itself was estimated at 17 +/- 7.
引用
收藏
页码:2120 / 2128
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1991, LEAD EDGE, DOI DOI 10.1190/1.1436820
[2]   ANOTHER LOOK AT NMO STRETCH [J].
BARNES, AE .
GEOPHYSICS, 1992, 57 (05) :749-751
[3]  
DASGUPTA R, 1994, THESIS U LEEDS
[4]   EFFECT OF NORMAL MOVEOUT ON A SEISMIC PULSE [J].
DUNKIN, JW ;
LEVIN, FK .
GEOPHYSICS, 1973, 38 (04) :635-642
[5]   EFFECT OF PARTIAL GAS-BRINE SATURATION ON ULTRASONIC-ABSORPTION IN SANDSTONE [J].
FRISILLO, AL ;
STEWART, TJ .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1980, 85 (NB10) :5209-5211
[6]   DISPERSIVE BODY WAVES [J].
FUTTERMAN, WI .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1962, 67 (13) :5279-&
[7]   MEASUREMENT OF ABSORPTION AND DISPERSION FROM CHECK SHOT SURVEYS [J].
GANLEY, DC ;
KANASEWICH, ER .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1980, 85 (NB10) :5219-5226
[8]  
Gao S, 1997, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V87, P961
[9]   COMPRESSIONAL-WAVE ATTENUATION IN MARINE SEDIMENTS [J].
HAMILTON, EL .
GEOPHYSICS, 1972, 37 (04) :620-+
[10]   COMPARISON OF METHODS TO DETERMINE Q IN SHALLOW MARINE-SEDIMENTS FROM VERTICAL REFLECTION SEISMOGRAMS [J].
JANNSEN, D ;
VOSS, J ;
THEILEN, F .
GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 1985, 33 (04) :479-497