Re-framing urban green spaces planning for flood protection through socio-ecological resilience in Bandung City, Indonesia

被引:61
作者
Afriyanie, Dian [1 ]
Julian, Miga M. [2 ,3 ]
Riqqi, Akhmad [2 ]
Akbar, Roos [4 ]
Suroso, Djoko S. A. [4 ]
Kustiwan, Iwan [4 ]
机构
[1] Inst Teknol Bandung ITB, Sch Architecture Planning & Policy Dev, Doctoral Program Reg & City Planning, Bandung, Indonesia
[2] Inst Teknol Bandung ITB, Fac Earth Sci & Technol, Bandung, Indonesia
[3] Friedrich Schiller Univ Jena FSU Jena, Geog Informat Sci, Jena, Germany
[4] Inst Teknol Bandung ITB, Sch Architecture Planning & Policy Dev, Dept Reg & City Planning, Jalan Ganesha 10, Bandung, Indonesia
关键词
Urban green spaces; Spatial planning; Socio-ecological resilience; Flood protection; Ecosystem services; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; INFRASTRUCTURE; ECOLOGY; CHALLENGES; FRAMEWORK; RESPONSES; CITIES; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.cities.2020.102710
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
An increasing number of studies use the advantages of the ecosystem services (ES) framework compared to the standard approach for identifying priority locations for urban green spaces. Few of these studies discuss the disparities between supply and demand of ES, which are dependent on spatial relationships and even fewer reveal the impact of land use zoning on disparities in ES. We advance the ES framework by examining the equitable distribution and resilient supply of flood protection of urban green spaces in Bandung City. To illustrate supply, we used land cover-based methods to produce flood protection benefits whereas we used the IPCC Risk Framework to generate flood risk for indicating demand. This study found that the distribution of urban green spaces is not equitably distributed and green space locations do not offer resilient supply of flood protection. Moreover, Bandung's existing zoning regulations will exacerbate these problems in the future. This paper provides insights into the considerations for determining spatial priorities in planning urban green spaces especially for flood protection and co-leverage of flood adaptation and mitigation measures. Furthermore, the paper demonstrates how to re-frame urban green spaces planning through socio-ecological resilience to inform the decision-making process in delivering inclusive urban ES.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Afriyanie D., 2018, IOP C SERIES
[2]  
Alberti Marina., 2008, ADV URBAN ECOLOGY IN
[3]   Cultural ecosystem services as a gateway for improving urban sustainability [J].
Andersson, Erik ;
Tengo, Maria ;
McPhearson, Timon ;
Kremer, Peleg .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2015, 12 :165-168
[4]   The problem of spatial fit in social-ecological systems: detecting mismatches between ecological connectivity and land management in an urban region [J].
Bergsten, Arvid ;
Galafassi, Diego ;
Bodin, Orjan .
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2014, 19 (04)
[5]   Comparison of Frameworks for Analyzing Social-ecological Systems [J].
Binder, Claudia R. ;
Hinkel, Jochen ;
Bots, Pieter W. G. ;
Pahl-Wostl, Claudia .
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (04)
[6]  
Borgström ST, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
[7]   River flood risk in Jakarta under scenarios of future change [J].
Budiyono, Yus ;
Aerts, Jeroen C. J. H. ;
Tollenaar, Daniel ;
Ward, Philip J. .
NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2016, 16 (03) :757-774
[8]   Flood risk assessment for delta mega-cities: a case study of Jakarta [J].
Budiyono, Yus ;
Aerts, Jeroen ;
Brinkman, JanJaap ;
Marfai, Muh Aris ;
Ward, Philip .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2015, 75 (01) :389-413
[9]  
Burkhard B., 2009, Landscape Online
[10]   Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets [J].
Burkhard, Benjamin ;
Kroll, Franziska ;
Nedkov, Stoyan ;
Mueller, Felix .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 21 :17-29