Pilot Evaluation of a Functional Pain Assessment Scale

被引:14
作者
Halm, Margo [1 ]
Bailey, Christie [2 ]
St Pierre, Jeanne [2 ]
Boutin, Nancy [2 ]
Rojo, Susan [2 ]
Shortt, Melissa [2 ]
Theobald, Lisa [2 ]
Pettycrew, Elena [2 ]
机构
[1] Salem Hlth Hosp & Clin, Nursing Res Profess Practice & Magnet, Salem, OR USA
[2] Salem Hlth Hosp & Clin, Salem, OR USA
关键词
inpatients; pain assessment tools; patient preference; psychometrics; self-report; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; RATING-SCALE; OLDER-ADULTS; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; INTENSITY; DEMENTIA; BEHAVIOR; YOUNGER;
D O I
10.1097/NUR.0000000000000416
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Purpose/Aims: Common pain assessment tools measure intensity, ignoring other dimensions of pain like function. The aim of this study was to test the psychometric properties of a newly developed functional pain assessment scale (FPAS) for use in clinical practice. Design/Methods: In this descriptive correlational study, an FPAS was developed and then evaluated against 2 validated pain tools in 68 hospitalized adult patients experiencing acute and/or chronic pain. These tools included the numeric pain rating scale and a 100-mm visual analog scale. Results: The FPAS was significantly correlated (rho = 0.72-0.87; P < .001) with the numeric pain rating scale and visual analog scale in cognitively intact patients but not the cognitively impaired (rho = 0.22-0.34; P > .05). Test-retest reliability coefficients for the 3 scales were high (rho = 0.82-0.94; P < .001), demonstrating stability of the measures. Overall, patients preferred the FPAS; this preference was significantly greater in patients older than 40 years. Conclusions: This pilot study provided support for the reliability and validity of the FPAS in cognitively intact patients experiencing pain. Although more research is needed, clinicians may consider using the FPAS with cognitively intact adults to assess the functional impact of pain on pain intensity. Clinical nurse specialists play a pivotal role in role modeling and guiding the introduction and testing of new assessment approaches into clinical practice settings across the continuum of care.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 21
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Sample size used to validate a scale: A review of publications on newly-developed patient reported outcomes measures [J].
Anthoine E. ;
Moret L. ;
Regnault A. ;
Sbille V. ;
Hardouin J.-B. .
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12 (1)
[2]  
Beck CT., 2012, Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice, V9th ed, DOI DOI 10.1097/00003465-199201000-00015
[3]   An audit of sample sizes for pilot and feasibility trials being undertaken in the United Kingdom registered in the United Kingdom Clinical Research Network database [J].
Billingham, Sophie A. M. ;
Whitehead, Amy L. ;
Julious, Steven A. .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2013, 13
[4]  
Borson S, 2000, INT J GERIATR PSYCH, V15, P1021, DOI 10.1002/1099-1166(200011)15:11<1021::AID-GPS234>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-6
[6]   A Proactive Response to Prescription Opioid Abuse [J].
Califf, Robert M. ;
Woodcock, Janet ;
Ostroff, Stephen .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 374 (15) :1480-1485
[7]  
Cleeland C. S., 1994, Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore, V23, P129
[8]   The reliability and construct validity of the neck disability index and patient specific functional scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy [J].
Cleland, JA ;
Fritz, JM ;
Whitman, JM ;
Palmer, JA .
SPINE, 2006, 31 (05) :598-602
[9]  
Dart RC, 2015, NEW ENGL J MED, V372, P241, DOI [10.1056/NEJMsa1406143, 10.1056/NEJMc1501822]
[10]   Facing up to the prescription opioid crisis [J].
Dhalla, Irfan A. ;
Persaud, Navindra ;
Juurlink, David N. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 343