Outcomes for Single-Level Lumbar Fusion The Role of Bone Morphogenetic Protein

被引:37
|
作者
Cahill, Kevin S. [1 ]
Chi, John H. [1 ]
Groff, Michael W. [3 ]
McGuire, Kevin [4 ]
Afendulis, Christopher C. [5 ]
Claus, Elizabeth B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[3] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Neurosurg, Boston, MA USA
[4] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped Surg, Boston, MA USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Care Policy, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
bone morphogenetic protein; spinal fusion; reoperation; revision fusion; lumbar spine; degenerative disease; costs; SPINE FUSION; POSTEROLATERAL FUSION; GRAFT; COST; SURGERY; COMPLICATIONS; STENOSIS; ICD-9-CM; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; INSTRUMENTATION;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820bc9e5
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Retrospective analysis of a population-based insurance claims data set. Objective. To determine the risk of repeat fusion and total costs associated with bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) use in single-level lumbar fusion for degenerative spinal disease. Summary of Background Data. The use of BMP has been proposed to reduce overall costs of spinal fusion through prevention of repeat fusion procedures. Although radiographic fusion rates associated with BMP use have been examined in clinical trials, few data exist regarding outcomes associated with BMP use in the general population. Methods. Using the MarketScan claims data set, 15,862 patients that underwent single-level lumbar fusion from 2003 to 2007 for degenerative disease were identified. Propensity scores were used to match 2372 patients who underwent fusion with BMP to patients who underwent fusion without BMP. Logistic regression models, Kaplan-Meier estimates, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine risk of repeat fusion, length of stay, and 30-day readmission by BMP use. Cost comparisons were evaluated with linear regression models using logarithmic transformed data. Results. At 1 year from surgery, BMP was associated with a 1.1% absolute decrease in the risk of repeat fusion (2.3% with BMP vs. 3.4% without BMP, P = 0.03) and an odds ratio for repeat fusion of 0.66 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.47-0.94) after multivariate adjustment. BMP was also associated with a decreased hazard ratio for long-term repeat fusion (adjusted hazards ratio = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.58-0.93). Cost analysis indicated that BMP was associated with initial increased costs for the surgical procedure (13.9% adjusted increase, 95% CI = 9.9%-17.9%) as well as total 1-year costs (10.1% adjusted increase, 95% CI = 6.2%-14.0%). Conclusion. At 1 year, BMP use was associated with a decreased risk of repeat fusion but also increased health care costs.
引用
收藏
页码:2354 / 2362
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Complications associated with single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Rihn, Jeffrey A.
    Patel, Ravi
    Makda, Junaid
    Hong, Joseph
    Anderson, David G.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Hilibrand, Alan S.
    Albert, Todd J.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (08) : 623 - 629
  • [2] Overlapping single-level lumbar fusion and adverse short-term outcomes
    Farooqi, Ali S.
    Detchou, Donald K. E.
    Glauser, Gregory
    Strouz, Krista
    McClintock, Scott D.
    Malhotra, Neil R.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2021, 35 (05) : 571 - 582
  • [3] Ten-Year Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Kwon, Ji-Won
    Park, Yung
    Lee, Byung Ho
    Yoon, So Ra
    Ha, Joong-Won
    Kim, Hyunkyo
    Suk, Kyung-Soo
    Moon, Seong-Hwan
    Kim, Hak-Sun
    Lee, Hwan-Mo
    SPINE, 2022, 47 (11) : 773 - 780
  • [4] Outcomes of patients undergoing single-level arthroplasty versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Khalid, Syed I.
    Deysher, Daniel
    Thompson, Kyle
    Ostrov, Philip B.
    Hossa, Jessica
    Mirpuri, Pranav
    Adogwa, Owoicho
    Mehta, Ankit I.
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2023, 165 (07) : 1915 - 1921
  • [5] Different Fusion Approaches for Single-level Lumbar Spondylolysis Have Similar Perioperative Outcomes
    Gala, Raj J.
    Bovonratwet, Patawut
    Webb, Matthew L.
    Varthi, Arya G.
    Daubs, Michael D.
    Grauer, Jonathan N.
    SPINE, 2018, 43 (02) : E111 - E117
  • [6] Patients undergoing overlapping posterior single-level lumbar fusion are not at greater risk for adverse 90-day outcomes
    Farooqi, Ali S.
    Detchou, Donald K.
    Glauser, Gregory
    Strouz, Krista
    McClintock, Scott D.
    Malhotra, Neil R.
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 203
  • [7] In Single-Level, Open, Posterior Lumbar Fusion, Does Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion or Posterolateral Fusion Lead to Better Outcomes?
    Chanbour, Hani
    Steinle, Anthony M.
    Tang, Alan R.
    Gardocki, Raymond J.
    Abtahi, Amir M.
    Stephens, Byron F.
    Zuckerman, Scott L.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 92 (01) : 110 - 117
  • [8] Physical Therapy Utilization After Single-level Posterior Lumbar Fusion
    Gouzoulis, Michael J.
    Moran, Jay
    Jeong, Seongho
    Galivanche, Anoop R.
    Kammien, Alexander J.
    Jabbouri, Sahir S.
    Grauer, Jonathan N.
    SPINE, 2024, 49 (17) : E272 - E278
  • [9] The Effect of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 in Single-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Arthrodesis
    Michielsen, J.
    Sys, J.
    Rigaux, A.
    Bertrand, C.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2013, 95A (10) : 873 - 880
  • [10] Allogeneic morphogenetic protein vs. recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in lumbar interbody fusion procedures: a radiographic and economic analysis
    Roh, Jeffrey S.
    Yeung, Christopher A.
    Field, Justin S.
    McClellan, R. Trigg
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2013, 8