Acoustic Rhinometry in Nasal Provocation Tests in Children and Adolescents

被引:7
作者
Wandalsen, G. F. [1 ]
Mendes, A. L. [1 ]
Matsumoto, F. [1 ]
Sole, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Sao Paulo UNIFESP, Dept Pediat, Div Allergy & Clin Immunol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Rhinitis; Nasal provocation tests; Histamine; Acoustic rhinometry; Rhinomanometry; Nasal cavity; Airway resistance; ALLERGIC RHINITIS; CHALLENGE; RESISTANCE; PATENCY;
D O I
10.18176/jiaci.0036
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Objectives: To standardize acoustic rhinometry (AR) in nasal provocation tests (NPTs) with histamine in children and adolescents. Patients and Methods: We performed a cross-sectional validation to compare AR with anterior active rhinomanometry (AAR) during histamine NPT in 20 children and adolescents with persistent allergic rhinitis and 20 controls. Changes in total nasal resistance (AAR) were compared with changes in nasal volume in the first 5 cm (V5). Results: Compared with controls, patients with rhinitis had significantly higher mean total nasal resistance (0.34 Pa/cm(3)/s vs 0.21 Pa/cm(3)/s; P=.01) and lower mean V5 values (8.20 cm(3) vs 9.24 cm(3); P=.04) at baseline. The mean histamine concentration necessary to increase total nasal resistance by at least 100% was significantly lower in the rhinitis group than in the control group (0.72 mg/mL vs 2.4 mg/mL; P<.001). At the end of the NPT a mean increase of 126% in total nasal resistance and a mean decrease of 24.3% in V5 were observed in the rhinitis group. When compared with the AAR criteria, the highest sensitivity and specificity values were observed for a cutoff represented by a 19%-21% drop in V5. Conclusions: We found AR to be a feasible and sensitive tool for monitoring nasal response in children and adolescents undergoing histamine NPT. The best AR cutoff for ending the NPT was a 19%-21% drop in V5.
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 160
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [11] Evaluation of acoustic rhinometry in a nasal provocation test with allergic rhinitis
    Kim, Young Hyo
    Yang, Tae Yong
    Lee, Dong Youl
    Ko, Kook Jin
    Shin, Seung Ho
    Jang, Tae Young
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2008, 139 (01) : 120 - 123
  • [12] Nasal provocation testing: a review
    Litvyakova, LI
    Baraniuk, JN
    [J]. ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2001, 86 (04) : 355 - +
  • [13] Malm L, 2000, RHINOLOGY, V38, P1
  • [14] Nasal hyperreactivity to methacholine measured by acoustic rhinometry in asymptomatic allergic and perennial nonallergic rhinitis
    Márquez, F
    Sastre, J
    Hernández, G
    Cenjor, C
    Sanchez-Hernandez, JM
    Sánchez, J
    Gutiérrez, R
    Sanabria, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY, 2000, 14 (04): : 251 - 256
  • [15] Assessment of the allergic reaction in seasonal rhinitis: Acoustic rhinometry is a sensitive and objective method
    Nielsen, LP
    Bjerke, T
    Christensen, MB
    Pedersen, B
    Rasmussen, TR
    Dahl, R
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 1996, 26 (11) : 1268 - 1275
  • [16] Parvez L, 2000, RHINOLOGY, P45
  • [17] The value of acoustic rhinometry in assessing nasal responses to cat exposure
    Phipatanakul, W
    Kesavanathan, J
    Eggleston, PA
    Johnson, EF
    Wood, RA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1998, 102 (06) : 896 - 901
  • [18] Roithmann R, 1997, Ear Nose Throat J, V76, P747
  • [19] Nasal allergen provocation test with multiple aeroallergens detects polysensitization in local allergic rhinitis
    Rondon, Carmen
    Campo, Paloma
    Herrera, Rocio
    Blanca-Lopez, Natalia
    Melendez, Lidia
    Canto, Gabriela
    Torres, Maria J.
    Blanca, Miguel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2011, 128 (06) : 1192 - 1197
  • [20] Scadding Glenis, 2011, Clin Transl Allergy, V1, P2, DOI 10.1186/2045-7022-1-2