Acoustic Rhinometry in Nasal Provocation Tests in Children and Adolescents

被引:7
作者
Wandalsen, G. F. [1 ]
Mendes, A. L. [1 ]
Matsumoto, F. [1 ]
Sole, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Sao Paulo UNIFESP, Dept Pediat, Div Allergy & Clin Immunol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Rhinitis; Nasal provocation tests; Histamine; Acoustic rhinometry; Rhinomanometry; Nasal cavity; Airway resistance; ALLERGIC RHINITIS; CHALLENGE; RESISTANCE; PATENCY;
D O I
10.18176/jiaci.0036
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Objectives: To standardize acoustic rhinometry (AR) in nasal provocation tests (NPTs) with histamine in children and adolescents. Patients and Methods: We performed a cross-sectional validation to compare AR with anterior active rhinomanometry (AAR) during histamine NPT in 20 children and adolescents with persistent allergic rhinitis and 20 controls. Changes in total nasal resistance (AAR) were compared with changes in nasal volume in the first 5 cm (V5). Results: Compared with controls, patients with rhinitis had significantly higher mean total nasal resistance (0.34 Pa/cm(3)/s vs 0.21 Pa/cm(3)/s; P=.01) and lower mean V5 values (8.20 cm(3) vs 9.24 cm(3); P=.04) at baseline. The mean histamine concentration necessary to increase total nasal resistance by at least 100% was significantly lower in the rhinitis group than in the control group (0.72 mg/mL vs 2.4 mg/mL; P<.001). At the end of the NPT a mean increase of 126% in total nasal resistance and a mean decrease of 24.3% in V5 were observed in the rhinitis group. When compared with the AAR criteria, the highest sensitivity and specificity values were observed for a cutoff represented by a 19%-21% drop in V5. Conclusions: We found AR to be a feasible and sensitive tool for monitoring nasal response in children and adolescents undergoing histamine NPT. The best AR cutoff for ending the NPT was a 19%-21% drop in V5.
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 160
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Correlation between acoustic rhinometry and subjective nasal patency during nasal challenge test in subjects with suspected occupational rhinitis; a prospective controlled study
    Castano, R.
    Trudeau, C.
    Ghezzo, H.
    [J]. CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2010, 35 (06) : 462 - 467
  • [2] Clement PAR, 2005, RHINOLOGY, V43, P169
  • [3] Djupesland P, 2000, RHINOLOGY, P52
  • [4] Dordal MT, 2011, J INVEST ALLERG CLIN, V21, P1
  • [5] Evaluation of acoustic rhinometry in a nasal provocation test with allergen
    Ganslmayer, M
    Spertini, F
    Rahm, F
    Terrien, MH
    Mosimann, B
    Leimgruber, A
    [J]. ALLERGY, 1999, 54 (09) : 974 - 979
  • [6] Giannico R, 1996, J INVEST ALLERG CLIN, V6, P110
  • [7] A study of some current methods for assessment of nasal histamine reactivity
    Hellgren, J
    Jarlstedt, J
    Dimberg, L
    Toren, K
    Karlsson, G
    [J]. CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 1997, 22 (06) : 536 - 541
  • [8] Hellings PW, 2012, RHINOLOGY, V50, P339, DOI [10.4193/Rhino11.252, 10.4193/Rhin11.252]
  • [9] ACOUSTIC RHINOMETRY - EVALUATION OF NASAL CAVITY GEOMETRY BY ACOUSTIC REFLECTION
    HILBERG, O
    JACKSON, AC
    SWIFT, DL
    PEDERSEN, OF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1989, 66 (01) : 295 - 303
  • [10] Acoustic rhinometry in nasal provocation test in perennial allergic rhinitis
    Keck, Tilman
    Wiesmiller, Kerstin
    Lindemann, Joerg
    Rozsasi, Ajnacska
    [J]. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2006, 263 (10) : 910 - 916