Japan, South Korea and the rise of a networked security architecture in East Asia

被引:6
作者
Dian, Matteo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dipartimento Sci Polit & Sociali, Str Maggiore 45, I-40125 Bologna, BO, Italy
关键词
Japan; South Korea; Regional order; Hegemony; Primary institutions; Alliances; CHINA; INTERESTS; DIPLOMACY; IDENTITY; POLITICS; POLICY; ORDER;
D O I
10.1057/s41311-019-00194-8
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
This article explains Japan's and South Korea's role in the transition from the hub-and-spokes alliance system to a networked security architecture in East Asia. It is argued that China's contestation of the rules-based international order in East Asia has been confronted by East Asian states through a mixture of resistance and accommodation. From a Japanese point of view, Beijing's ascendency is considered particularly disruptive for the regional order. Consequently, Japan has become a central hub in the development of the networked security architecture enacting two complementary strategies: the consolidation of the alliance with the United States and the creation of new and less binding forms of bilateral, minilateral and multilateral security partnerships with Asian allies. By contrast, since Seoul considers China as an essential partner for the stabilisation of the Korean Peninsula, it has played a more peripheral role in the development of this regional networking dynamic.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 207
页数:23
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
Abe S, 2012, ASIAS SECURITY DIAMO
[2]  
Abe S, 2016, PARADOXES GREY ZONE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Economic Times
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Pak Tribune
[5]  
[Anonymous], IMPLICATIONS GEN SEC
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ASIA PACIFIC J JAPAN
[7]  
Blue House, 2009, GLOB KOR NAT SEC STR
[8]  
Bull Hedley., 1977, ANARCHICAL SOC STUDY
[9]   The English School: A neglected approach to International Security Studies [J].
Buzan, Barry .
SECURITY DIALOGUE, 2015, 46 (02) :126-143
[10]   Abandonment, entrapment, and neoclassical realism in Asia: The United States, Japan, and Korea [J].
Cha, VD .
INTERNATIONAL STUDIES QUARTERLY, 2000, 44 (02) :261-291