A non-dominated sorting based evolutionary algorithm for many-objective optimization problems

被引:1
作者
Mane, S. U. [1 ]
Rao, M. R. Narasinga [1 ]
机构
[1] Deemed Univ, Koneru Lakshmaiah Educ Fdn, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Vaddeswaram, AP, India
关键词
Many-objective hybrid differential evolution algorithm; Non-dominated sorting; Decomposition-based approach; Differential evolution algorithm; Particle swarm optimization algorithm; Many-objective optimization problems; PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION; DIFFERENTIAL EVOLUTION; GA; HYBRIDIZATION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.24200/sci.2021.53026.3017
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The optimization problems with more than three objectives are Many-objective Optimization Problems (MaOPs) that exist in various scientific and engineering domains. The existing multi-objective evolutionary algorithms are not found effective in addressing the MaOPs. Its limitations initiated the need to develop an algorithm that efficiently solves MaOPs. The proposed work presents the design of the Many-Objective Hybrid Differential Evolution (MaOHDE) algorithm to address MaOPs. Initially, two multi-objective evolutionary algorithms viz. Non-dominated Sorting based Multi-Objective Differential Evolution (NS-MODE) and Non-dominated Sorting based Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization (NS-MOPSO) algorithms were designed. These algorithms were developed by incorporating the non-dominated sorting approach from Non-dominated Sorting-based Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), the ranking approach, weight vector, and reference points. Tchebycheff-a decomposition-based approach, was applied to decompose the MaOPs. The MaOHDE algorithm was developed by hybridizing the NS-MODE with the NS-MOPSO algorithm. The strength of the presented approach was determined using 20 instances of DTLZ functions, and its effectiveness and efficiency were verified upon its comparison with the recently developed state of algorithms existing in the literature. From the results, it is observed that the MaOHDE responds better than its competitors or is competitive for most of the test instances and the convergence rate is also good. (C) 2021 Sharif University of Technology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3293 / 3314
页数:22
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   An Algorithm for Many-Objective Optimization with Reduced Objective Computations: A Study in Differential Evolution [J].
Bandyopadhyay, Sanghamitra ;
Mukherjee, Arpan .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2015, 19 (03) :400-413
[2]   A review of particle swarm optimization. Part I: Background and development [J].
Banks A. ;
Vincent J. ;
Anyakoha C. .
Natural Computing, 2007, 6 (4) :467-484
[3]   A review of particle swarm optimization. Part II: hybridisation, combinatorial, multicriteria and constrained optimization, and indicative applications [J].
Alec Banks ;
Jonathan Vincent ;
Chukwudi Anyakoha .
Natural Computing, 2008, 7 (1) :109-124
[4]  
Batista LS, 2011, IEEE C EVOL COMPUTAT, P2359
[5]   Defining a standard for particle swarm optimization [J].
Bratton, Daniel ;
Kennedy, James .
2007 IEEE SWARM INTELLIGENCE SYMPOSIUM, 2007, :120-+
[6]   Reference-Point Based Multi-Swarm Algorithm for Many-Objective Problems [J].
Britto, Andre ;
Pozo, Aurora .
2015 BRAZILIAN CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (BRACIS 2015), 2015, :252-257
[7]   Solving Many-Objective Optimization Problems via Multistage Evolutionary Search [J].
Chen, Huangke ;
Cheng, Ran ;
Pedrycz, Witold ;
Jin, Yaochu .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2021, 51 (06) :3552-3564
[8]   A Reference Vector Guided Evolutionary Algorithm for Many-Objective Optimization [J].
Cheng, Ran ;
Jin, Yaochu ;
Olhofer, Markus ;
Sendhoff, Bernhard .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2016, 20 (05) :773-791
[9]  
Dai S., 2016, P 2015 11 INT C COMP, P286
[10]   Recent advances in differential evolution - An updated survey [J].
Das, Swagatam ;
Mullick, Sankha Subhra ;
Suganthan, P. N. .
SWARM AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2016, 27 :1-30