Limiting global warming to below 1.5 °C from 2 °C: An energy-system-based multi-model analysis for China

被引:31
作者
Zheng, Jiali [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Duan, Hongbo [2 ]
Zhou, Sheng [4 ]
Wang, Shouyang [2 ,3 ]
Gao, Ji [5 ]
Jiang, Kejun [6 ]
Gao, Shuo [5 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Management, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Acad Math & Syst Sci, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[4] Tsinghua Univ, Inst Energy Environm & Econ, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[5] Environm Def Fund, Beijing 100007, Peoples R China
[6] Natl Dev & Reform Commiss, Energy Res Inst, Beijing 100038, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Integrated assessment model; Multi-model comparisons; Paris agreement pledges; Energy restructuring; Mitigation; China; CARBON EMISSIONS; CO2; EMISSIONS; CLIMATE; PATHWAYS; TARGETS; TRANSITION; COSTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105355
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Enhancing the temperature-increase limit to below 1.5 degrees C from 2 degrees C is of great significance for climate change mitigation, and this stricter limit challenges China's role in combating global warming. This study aims to explore how China addresses such challenges in the attainment of this more stringent warming-limit goal through sustainable transition. By using multi-model analysis, the robustness of findings is enhanced, while providing appropriate options based on model comparisons. The 1.5 degrees C limit means further reduction of emissions-up to 22%-and a ten-year earlier peak. From 2 degrees C to 1.5 degrees C, primary energy consumption will decrease by 22% to 28%, while policy costs will further increase by up to 37%. Greater technological progress facilitates larger contributions to CO2 emission reductions, given the shift from 2 degrees C to 1.5 degrees C. With diminishing marginal policy costs, the energy system can be reconstructed by initiating early actions on low-carbon and negative-emission technology development, and in the long term by coordinating state-of-the-art alternative technologies. This study provides reliable assessments of goal-strengthened achievements for China, including emission reductions, technology development, structural improvement, and economic performance for China. Furthermore, this study's multi-model comparisons show underlying implications for sustainable transition, which could also be conducive to the global practice of addressing climate change.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Allen MylesR., 2014, Climate Change 2014. Synthesis Report. Approved Summary for Policymakers
[2]   Carbon capture and storage from fossil fuels and biomass -: Costs and potential role in stabilizing the atmosphere [J].
Azar, Christian ;
Lindgren, Kristian ;
Larson, Eric ;
Moellersten, Kenneth .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2006, 74 (1-3) :47-79
[3]   Harmonization vs. fragmentation: overview of climate policy scenarios in EMF27 [J].
Blanford, Geoffrey J. ;
Kriegler, Elmar ;
Tavoni, Massimo .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2014, 123 (3-4) :383-396
[4]  
Bosetti V, 2006, ENERG J, P13
[5]  
Bouwman AF, 2006, INTEGRATED MODELLING
[6]   The role of Asia in mitigating climate change: Results from the Asia modeling exercise [J].
Calvin, Katherine ;
Clarke, Leon ;
Krey, Volker ;
Blanford, Geoffrey ;
Jiang, Kejun ;
Kainuma, Mikiko ;
Kriegler, Elmar ;
Luderer, Gunnar ;
Shukla, P. R. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2012, 34 :S251-S260
[7]  
Capros P., 2013, GEM-E3 Model Documentation
[8]  
de Coninck H, 2018, Strengthening and implementing the global response
[9]   Characterization Factors for Global Warming in Life Cycle Assessment Based on Damages to Humans and Ecosystems [J].
De Schryver, An M. ;
Brakkee, Karin W. ;
Goedkoop, Mark J. ;
Huijbregts, Mark A. J. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 43 (06) :1689-1695
[10]   Modelling the Evolutionary Paths of Multiple Carbon-Free Energy Technologies with Policy Incentives [J].
Duan, Hong-Bo ;
Zhu, Lei ;
Fan, Ying .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING & ASSESSMENT, 2015, 20 (01) :55-69