Comparison study of artificial intelligence method for short term groundwater level prediction in the northeast Gachsaran unconfined aquifer

被引:37
作者
Khedri, Akbar [1 ]
Kalantari, Nasrollah [1 ]
Vadiati, Meysam [2 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Chamran Univ Ahwaz, Fac Earth Sci, Golestan Blvd, Ahvaz, Khuzestan, Iran
[2] Kharazmi Univ, Dept Appl Geol, Fac Geosci, Tehran, Iran
关键词
data-driven methods; fuzzy logic; groundwater level prediction; group method of data handling; support vector machine; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; NEURAL-NETWORK; PRECIPITATION; HYDROLOGY; MODELS;
D O I
10.2166/ws.2020.015
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Accurate and reliable groundwater level prediction is an important issue in groundwater resource management. The objective of this research is to compare groundwater level prediction of several data-driven models for different prediction periods. Five different data-driven methods are compared to evaluate their performances to predict groundwater levels with 1-, 2- and 3-month lead times. The four quantitative standard statistical performance evaluation measures showed that while all models could provide acceptable predictions of groundwater level, the least square support vector machine (LSSVM) model was the most accurate. We developed a set of input combinations based on different levels of groundwater, total precipitation, average temperature and total evapotranspiration at monthly intervals. For each model, the antecedent inputs that included Ht-1, Ht-2, Ht-3, T-t, ETt, P-t,P- Pt-1 produced the best-fit model for 1-month lead time. The coefficient of determination (R-2) and the root mean square error (RMSE) were calculated as 0.99%, 1.05 meters for the train data set, and 95%, 2.3 meters for the test data set, respectively. It was also demonstrated that many combinations the above-mentioned approaches could model groundwater levels for 1 and 2 months ahead appropriately, but for 3 months ahead the performance of the models was not satisfactory.
引用
收藏
页码:909 / 921
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], FUZZY LOGIC TOOLBOX
[2]  
[Anonymous], WATER RESOURCES RES
[3]  
[Anonymous], SUPPORT VECTOR LEARN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, INT C COMP INT
[5]  
[Anonymous], INT C ART NEUR NETW
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Acm T. Intel. Syst. Tec., DOI DOI 10.1145/1961189.1961199
[7]  
Basak D., 2007, Neural Information Processing - Letters and Reviews, V11, P203
[8]   Artificial neural network modeling of water table depth fluctuations [J].
Coulibaly, P ;
Anctil, F ;
Aravena, R ;
Bobée, B .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2001, 37 (04) :885-896
[9]   Groundwater level forecasting using artificial neural networks [J].
Daliakopoulos, IN ;
Coulibaly, P ;
Tsanis, IK .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2005, 309 (1-4) :229-240
[10]   Prediction the Groundwater Level of Bastam Plain (Iran) by Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) [J].
Emamgholizadeh, Samad ;
Moslemi, Khadije ;
Karami, Gholamhosein .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2014, 28 (15) :5433-5446