The Value of Patch Testing With Shoe Material Samples in Patients Suspected of Shoe Allergic Contact Dermatitis

被引:1
作者
Boonchai, Waranya [1 ]
Wongdama, Supisara [1 ]
Kumpangsin, Titinun [1 ]
Bunyavaree, Monthathip [1 ]
Pruksaeakanan, Chutipon [1 ]
Chaiyabutr, Chayada [1 ]
机构
[1] Mahidol Univ, Siriraj Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Dermatol, 2 Wanglang Rd, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
关键词
FOOT DERMATITIS; SERIES; EXPERIENCE; CHROMIUM;
D O I
10.1097/DER.0000000000000790
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background Patch testing is the standard diagnostic tool for shoe allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). As shoe materials change over time, utilizing commercial allergen series might be ineffective. However, because testing with patients' shoe samples is laborious, its value is questioned. Objective The aim of this study was to ascertain the benefits of patch testing with patients' shoes by comparing the frequencies of patch-test positivity of shoes and shoe-related allergens in baseline series for suspected shoe ACD patients. Methods A retrospective study was conducted of patients with clinically suspected shoe ACD who underwent patch testing with baseline series and shoe samples 2000 to 2019. Results Almost half of the cohort (77 of 178; 43.3%) was diagnosed with shoe ACD. Of those 77, 48 (62.3%) were positive to shoe-related allergens from the baseline series, whereas 53 (68.8%) were positive to their shoe materials. The prevalence of tests positive to shoe material but negative to shoe-related allergens was 29 of 77 (37.7%). The most common shoe-related allergens were potassium dichromate (7.9%), carba mix (6.8%), and mercapto mix (6.7%). Conclusions Patch testing with shoe materials increased the diagnostic yield by 37.7 percent. To diagnose shoe ACD, testing of shoe materials may compensate for unknown, scarce, or novel allergens not in the baseline series.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 121
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Isobornyl Acrylate
    Aerts, Olivier
    Herman, Anne
    Mowitz, Martin
    Bruze, Magnus
    Goossens, An
    [J]. DERMATITIS, 2020, 31 (01) : 4 - 12
  • [2] Contact allergy caused by isothiazolinone derivatives: an overview of non-cosmetic and unusual cosmetic sources
    Aerts, Olivier
    Goossens, An
    Lambert, Julien
    Lepoittevin, Jean-Pierre
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2017, 27 (02) : 115 - 122
  • [3] Aithal V, 2019, Clin Dermatol Rev., V3, P62
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2020, CHEMOTECHNIQUE DIAGN
  • [5] Suitability of patch test allergens for standard series in Thai patients: Ten-year retrospective review of patch test results
    Boonchai, Waranya
    Kasemsarn, Pranee
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2013, 40 (01) : 65 - 67
  • [6] Allergic contact dermatitis to Crocs™
    Castanedo-Tardan, Mari Paz
    Gelpi, Carmen
    Jacob, Sharon E.
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2008, 58 (04) : 248 - U13
  • [7] Epidemio-allergological study in 155 cases of footwear dermatitis
    Chowdhuri, Sanjib
    Ghosh, Sanjay
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY VENEREOLOGY & LEPROLOGY, 2007, 73 (05) : 319 - 322
  • [8] Allergic Contact Dermatitis Due to Paraphenylenediamine: An Update
    Encabo Duran, B.
    Romero-Perez, D.
    Silvestre Salvador, J. F.
    [J]. ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS, 2018, 109 (07): : 602 - 609
  • [9] Contact allergy in Indonesian patients with foot eczema attributed to shoes
    Febriana, S. A.
    Soebono, H.
    Coenraads, P. J.
    Schuttelaar, M. L. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2015, 29 (08) : 1582 - 1589
  • [10] Garg Taru, 2017, Indian Dermatol Online J, V8, P323, DOI 10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_254_16