The pollution scale weighting model in water quality evaluation based on the improved fuzzy variable theory

被引:14
作者
Zeng, Qin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Luo, Xi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yan, Feng [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Coll Water Conservancy & Hydropower Engn, Nanjing 210098, Peoples R China
[2] Nanchang Univ, Key Lab Poyang Lake Environm & Resource Utilizat, Minist Educ, Nanchang 330031, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[3] Nanchang Univ, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Nanchang 330031, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Entropy weight model; Pollution scale weighting model; Water quality evaluation; Poyang Lake; Fuzzy variable theory; INDEX; RIVER; LAKE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108562
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Entropy weight model (EWM) is the most widely used objective weighting method for evaluating water quality. However, for the pollutant the data of which concentrate on the high polluted grade, EWM often neglects its importance, for its discrimination degree is low. To solve this problem, a pollution scale weighting model (PSWM) is proposed based on the improved fuzzy variable theory. In PSWM, the importance of the indicator is quantified by its relative membership to the vague concept: "pollution". The higher the pollution degree is, the larger its weight is; and vice versa. And then, PSWM is applied into the water quality evaluation of Southeastern Poyang Lake. Results are as follows. (1) The relative memberships of CODMn, NH3-N, and TP to the vague concept "pollution" are 0.39, 0.33, and 0.99, respectively. And according to PSWM, their weights are 0.227, 0.193, and 0.580, respectively. (2) The comprehensive water quality indices of the Nanjishan wetland, lake region, Xin River estuary, and Rao River estuary are 36.2, 28.6, 25.7 and 21.1, respectively, all of which belong to "bad" grade. The environment of Southeastern Poyang Lake suffers serious damage, and the aquatic ecosystem faces a high threat. (3) Compared with EWM, PSWM can highlight the seriously polluted index and emphasize its practical significance in water resources management, thereby effectively improving the accuracy and rationality of water quality evaluation.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Agency C.E.P., 2002, GB38382002 AG CEP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, ENG FUZZY SET THEORY
[3]   A water quality index applied to an international shared river basin: The case of the douro river [J].
Bordalo, Adriano A. ;
Teixeira, Rita ;
Wiebe, William J. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2006, 38 (06) :910-920
[4]   An Integrated Assessment and Factor Analysis of Water Related Environmental Risk to Cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt [J].
Cui, Xiaolin ;
Wu, Jia ;
Li, Zhihui ;
Peng, Lu ;
Shen, Zhan ;
Bi, Jia .
WATER, 2021, 13 (16)
[5]   Hydrochemical dynamics of water quality for irrigation use and introducing a new water quality index incorporating multivariate statistics [J].
Dash, Siddhant ;
Kalamdhad, Ajay S. .
ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2021, 80 (03)
[6]   Uncertainty index based interval assignment by Interval AHP [J].
Entani, Tomoe ;
Sugihara, Kazutomi .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 219 (02) :379-385
[7]   Introducing Biological Indicators into CCME WQI Using Variable Fuzzy Set Method [J].
Feng, Yan ;
Bao, Qian ;
Chenglin, Liu ;
Bowen, Wei ;
Mang, You .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2018, 32 (08) :2901-2915
[8]   A fuzzy multi-objective multiple-pollutant model for rivers using an ant colony algorithm [J].
Ghorbani, Mohammad Kazem ;
Afshar, Abbas ;
Hamidifar, Hossein ;
Reddy, Manne Janga .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-WATER MANAGEMENT, 2022, 175 (04) :190-205
[9]   River water quality management using a fuzzy optimization model and the NSFWQI Index [J].
Ghorbani, Mohammad Kazem ;
Afshar, Abbas ;
Hamidifar, Hossein .
WATER SA, 2021, 47 (01) :45-53
[10]   Groundwater quality ranking for drinking purposes, using the entropy method and the spatial autocorrelation index [J].
Gorgij, Alireza Docheshmeh ;
Kisi, Ozgur ;
Moghaddam, Asghar Asghari ;
Taghipour, Aliakbar .
ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2017, 76 (07)