Development of a portable grain mass flow sensor test rig

被引:16
作者
Loghavi, M. [2 ]
Ehsani, R. [1 ]
Reeder, R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, IFAS, Dept Agr & Biol Engn, Ctr Citrus Res & Educ, Lake Alfred, FL 33850 USA
[2] Shiraz Univ, Coll Agr, Agr Machinery Dept, Shiraz, Iran
[3] Ohio State Univ, Dept Food Agr & Biol Engn, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
mass flow sensor; yield monitor accuracy; yield monitor error; test rig;
D O I
10.1016/j.compag.2007.11.002
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
A portable grain mass flow sensor test rig was built to measure the accuracy of a mass flow sensor with dual use in the field as well as in the lab. Concurrently, a synchronization method was developed that employs GPS timing data to synchronize the mass flow sensor data with the reference scale data. Two-point calibration was compared to multi-point calibration under steady-state flow. These tests on mass flow rate of corn with no variation in ground slope indicated that a multi-point calibration is preferable to a two-point calibration, confirming the results of previous research. The results indicated that the accuracy of the mass flow sensor is very good (R-2 = 0.99) if it is run about the specific flow rate for which it was calibrated. Errors up to 8.2% occurred at lower flow rates when the system had been calibrated only at zero and the maximum flow rate. The effect of slope on accuracy of the mass flow sensor was investigated by inclining the clean grain elevator in two planes simulating pitch and roll. A roll of S' (sideways) did not alter the mass flow sensor zero-point calibration and showed no significant effect on accuracy of the mass flow sensor. At 10 degrees pitch, the calib. ration was altered and significantly affected the accuracy of the mass flow sensor, especially at lower grain flow rates. Ground slope could have an adverse effect on mass.flow sensor accuracy; however, the mass flow sensor can perform well when calibrated for a given slope. The results with a relatively small test rig verify the concept, and show that a larger rig could accurately simulate field conditions for mass flow sensors on the biggest combines available. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 168
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Al-Mahasneh MA, 2000, T ASAE, V43, P801, DOI 10.13031/2013.2974
[2]  
Arslan S., 1998, Applied Engineering in Agriculture, V14, P369
[3]  
Arslan S, 1999, APPL ENG AGRIC, V15, P189
[4]   An evaluation of the response of yield monitors and combines to varying yields [J].
Arslan S. ;
Colvin T.S. .
Precision Agriculture, 2002, 3 (2) :107-122
[5]   Comparison of sensors and techniques for crop yield mapping [J].
Birrell, SJ ;
Sudduth, KA ;
Borgelt, SC .
COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 1996, 14 (2-3) :215-233
[6]  
Burks TF, 2004, APPL ENG AGRIC, V20, P269
[7]  
Burks TF, 2003, APPL ENG AGRIC, V19, P5
[8]  
COLVIN TS, 2000, P 5 INT C AGR JUL 16
[9]  
Grisso RD, 2002, APPL ENG AGRIC, V18, P147
[10]  
JASA JP, 2000, 001085 ASAE