A fuzzy group analytical hierarchy process approach for software quality assurance management: Fuzzy logarithmic least squares method

被引:32
作者
Yuen, Kevin Kam Fung [1 ]
Lau, Henry C. W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Zirve Univ, Dept Business Adm, TR-27260 Gaziantep, Turkey
[2] Univ Western Sydney, Sch Management, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Fuzzy group analytical hierarchy process (AHP); Decision analysis; Software quality assurance; Software engineering; Software project evaluation; EXTENT ANALYSIS METHOD; DECISION; AHP;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.057
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper proposes a Fuzzy Group Analytical Hierarchy Process approach for assessing the quality of software, with judgments by a group of experts at different levels. The international standard of software quality attributes, ISO/IEC9126-1:2001 which comprises of 6 criteria with 27 subcriteria, is applied as the attributes of software quality. Regarding the prioritization method, the modified fuzzy Logarithmic Least Squares Method (LLSM) is applied to derive the importance weight vectors. The Fuzzy Prioritization Programming for Direct Rating Scales (FPP-DRS) on the basis of the modified fuzzy LLSM and the rescaling functions is proposed to design the direct rating scales in fuzzy number. The Fuzzy Synthesis Programming for Absolute Measurement (FSPAM) including Integrated Fuzzy Scores of Individual Expert (IFSIE) and Group Integrated Fuzzy Score (GIFS) is proposed to aggregate the criteria values from various experts. The proposed approach can help a group of various experts including developers, testers and purchasers, to measure the level of the software quality of the in-house development or the third party development. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:10292 / 10302
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 91262 ISOIEC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, ISO/IEC 9126-1:2001
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, 91263 ISOIEC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1991, 9126 ISOIEC
[5]   Measuring the usability of software components [J].
Bertoa, MF ;
Troya, JM ;
Vallecillo, A .
JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2006, 79 (03) :427-439
[6]   Quality in use: Meeting user needs for quality [J].
Bevan, N .
JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 1999, 49 (01) :89-96
[7]   MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS WITH FUZZY PAIRWISE COMPARISONS [J].
BOENDER, CGE ;
DEGRAAN, JG ;
LOOTSMA, FA .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1989, 29 (02) :133-143
[8]   A fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach for software development strategy selection [J].
Büyüközkan, G ;
Kahraman, C ;
Ruan, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL SYSTEMS, 2004, 33 (2-3) :259-280
[9]   Integrating fuzzy theory and hierarchy concepts to evaluate software quality [J].
Chang, Che-Wei ;
Wu, Cheng-Ru ;
Lin, Hung-Lung .
SOFTWARE QUALITY JOURNAL, 2008, 16 (02) :263-276
[10]   Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP [J].
Chang, DY .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 95 (03) :649-655